Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Cam and emissions compliance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-20-2006, 06:25 PM
  #1  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
LS1Zedder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Cam and emissions compliance

Hey guys. I have done a lot of searching and reading lately. I think it may be time for me to do a cam soon. Car is a 98 Z28 M6, pacesetters, TSP catted Y and LM 1. The car is raced seldom and basically is a city cruiser. I need a cam that will: 1) give me a nice SOTP, down low, crusing around town power increase 2) A nice Rumpity, Rump sound and 3) Pass the sniffer etest. My friend has HP tuners and a wideband set up so we can tune after the cam. I've read that a -7 overlap is what I need for the smog test. Do other things also affect the abiltiy to pass? Like lobe profile (XE vs XE-R) and lift. For example a TR224 VS a TSP224R, same overlap. Would both pass equally? How about LSA? Like a TR224 114 VS a TR220 112. Both -4, would both of these pass equally?

I know the 224 cams are borderline for passing. I want to able to tune myself for etesting and daily driving. I also want lots of leeway for etesting (dont want to pay a professional to tune a "borderline cam")

The cams I am condidering are: TR224 or a TSP224R. If these are "iffy" for passing smog then TR220, TSP220 or Speed Inc's Comp 222/222. All on a 114.

Im not concerned with spring life as the car only sees about 3000 KM a year or less.

Can you guys offer any sugestions? Sorry for the long post.
Old 02-20-2006, 07:17 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Phil'sC5vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tampa
Posts: 1,074
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Tr224
Old 02-20-2006, 07:23 PM
  #3  
ЯєŧąяĐ Єl¡m¡иąŧøя ™
iTrader: (18)
 
orangeapeel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Justin, TX
Posts: 16,083
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I was under the impression that most cams under 230 were smog friendly for the most part...depending on other variables.
Old 02-21-2006, 07:32 AM
  #4  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
LS1Zedder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

to the top
Old 02-21-2006, 09:23 AM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
 
4mula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: cyberspace
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

comp 224/ 581 with a 114 lsa.
Old 02-21-2006, 10:37 AM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Ragtop 99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

1) give me a nice SOTP, down low, crusing around town power increase 2) A nice Rumpity, Rump sound and 3) Pass the sniffer etest
The TR 220 on a 112 LSA best meets that criteria. Same overlap as the 224 cam on a 114 so tuning will be very similar but the response in the 2000 - 3000 rpm range will be stronger than the 224 cam.
Old 02-21-2006, 02:11 PM
  #7  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
LS1Zedder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Thanks Ragtop
Old 02-21-2006, 02:50 PM
  #8  
Mat
Launching!
 
Mat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Good stuff Rich.

I'm hoping that something with 0.5 degrees of overlap can be made to pass an e-test up here as well or else I'll be doing a cam swap once every 2.5 years.

To further Rich's question, will a cam with -7 degrees overlap require no tuning at all to pass an e-test and a cam with say -4 degree's just a few minor touches? Are most of you guys running a "sniffer" tune and then another tune maximized for WOT power?

So far I'm planning on running my cam and tuning it first for max power using the wideband and HPTuners. After getting it dialed in that way I figured I'd work on a sniffer tune and do a few tricks here and there with timing, idle speed, fuel additive etc. and then test it on an e-test dyno to see if it's able to pass both with the power tune, and next with the sniffer tune. I'm curious to see the differences between both.

What kinds of cams are you Cali guys getting to pass your tests if any? Or do you do the big swap every time the test comes about?
Old 02-21-2006, 04:25 PM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Ragtop 99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I know that a number of people have made the 224/224 114 pass the sniffer without a special tune or additives. Bumping the idle to 950 rpm for the test helps. Others have made bigger cams pass playing with timing etc and using 1000+ rpm idle speeds.
Old 02-21-2006, 07:26 PM
  #10  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
spazzyfry123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Atlanta / Florida
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ragtop 99
The TR 220 on a 112 LSA best meets that criteria. Same overlap as the 224 cam on a 114 so tuning will be very similar but the response in the 2000 - 3000 rpm range will be stronger than the 224 cam.
How does this sound? I am sort of in the same boat as LS1Zedder. I do not currently have emission-testing where I live, but I'm sure it'll eventually catch up to me

Originally Posted by Ragtop 99
I know that a number of people have made the 224/224 114 pass the sniffer without a special tune or additives. Bumping the idle to 950 rpm for the test helps. Others have made bigger cams pass playing with timing etc and using 1000+ rpm idle speeds.
Forgive me if I stray off of topic here...Can you define "bigger cams"? Or better yet, can you give an example of what a bigger cam is to you? I am really wanting a great sounding car at idle, but to acheive this I would need a car with more duration, correct? The only thing that is keeping me away from a larger cam is the loss of low-end power. But can this low-end power be "recovered" by going with higher ratio rear-end gears and possibly advancing the timing? My ears are very keen to the T-Rex cam, but I would be afraid of its drivability on a M6 car (daily driver).
Old 02-21-2006, 07:54 PM
  #11  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Redneck Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Citrus Heights, CA
Posts: 2,305
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Ragtop 99
I know that a number of people have made the 224/224 114 pass the sniffer without a special tune or additives. Bumping the idle to 950 rpm for the test helps. Others have made bigger cams pass playing with timing etc and using 1000+ rpm idle speeds.

Why does bumping the idle to 950 help to pass a smog test?
Old 02-21-2006, 09:15 PM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Ragtop 99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by spazzyfry123
Forgive me if I stray off of topic here...Can you define "bigger cams"? Or better yet, can you give an example of what a bigger cam is to you?
By bigger cams I was referring to cams around 230* duration rather than 224*.

I am really wanting a great sounding car at idle, but to acheive this I would need a car with more duration, correct?
False. Idle speed is the key to getting the lopey sound. The 220/220 112 at 750 rpm will sound just as aggressive as a 230/230 112 with an 875 rpm idle

The only thing that is keeping me away from a larger cam is the loss of low-end power. But can this low-end power be "recovered" by going with higher ratio rear-end gears and possibly advancing the timing? My ears are very keen to the T-Rex cam, but I would be afraid of its drivability on a M6 car (daily driver).
Gears do improve the SOTP response and also get you into powerband sooner. Timing isn't a solution per se because the smaller cam should be optimally tuned just as you would tune the larger cam. You need to decide what you really want from a cam and where your combination of mods is going.


Why does bumping the idle to 950 help to pass a smog test?
Generally, the "bigger" the cam, the less efficent it is at very low rpms. Because of the extra overlap of a bigger cam, it is going to run rich and generally have less complete combustion. Good, patient tuning can deal with this, but a higher idle speed helps move the cam to a little more efficent point and makes it easier to tune.
Old 02-21-2006, 10:32 PM
  #13  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
spazzyfry123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Atlanta / Florida
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ragtop 99
By bigger cams I was referring to cams around 230* duration rather than 224*.

False. Idle speed is the key to getting the lopey sound. The 220/220 112 at 750 rpm will sound just as aggressive as a 230/230 112 with an 875 rpm idle

Gears do improve the SOTP response and also get you into powerband sooner. Timing isn't a solution per se because the smaller cam should be optimally tuned just as you would tune the larger cam. You need to decide what you really want from a cam and where your combination of mods is going.



Generally, the "bigger" the cam, the less efficent it is at very low rpms. Because of the extra overlap of a bigger cam, it is going to run rich and generally have less complete combustion. Good, patient tuning can deal with this, but a higher idle speed helps move the cam to a little more efficent point and makes it easier to tune.
Great info! Thanks a lot! I want to have mid-range to top end performance from the cam (Maybe starting around 2500? Does that sound right?). Simply hearing "False. Idle speed is the key to getting the lopey sound. The 220/220 112 at 750 rpm will sound just as aggressive as a 230/230 112 with an 875 rpm idle" has changed my outlook on the search for the right camshaft dramatically. I mean, sure, I want to add power doing this, but you can't beat that great loping sound at the red light!
Old 02-24-2006, 12:56 PM
  #14  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
LS1Zedder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

So the lower LSA moves the power down in the RPM range? I always thought the opposite was true. Thanks for the info. One more question though. What are the benifits if any of a split cam? Is it benificial for guys that run cats to have a little bit more duration on the exhaust side? Thanks again.
Old 02-24-2006, 03:07 PM
  #15  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Ragtop 99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I hate to generalize on LSA, but wider LSAs tend to make a flatter power curve while tighter LSAs tend to make the cam peakier and you notice the on cam / off cam feeling more. The combination of a smaller duration and tighter LSA makes it easier to move the power down.

Extra exhaust duration does help exhaust flow when you have restrictions such as cats or poorly designed manifolds (e.g. stock).
Old 02-24-2006, 06:34 PM
  #16  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
LS1Zedder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Thanks again Ragtop.
Old 02-24-2006, 08:00 PM
  #17  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (63)
 
BitViper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sandy Ego, Ca.
Posts: 2,343
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Im assuming that SOTP = Stomp On The Peddle
Old 02-26-2006, 11:37 AM
  #18  
Mat
Launching!
 
Mat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

SOTP = Seat Of The Pants.

Hmm.. the cam I'm looking at has about 0.5 degree's of overlap. I'm wondering if I'll get into any issues with passing the sniffer. I can tune my vehicle with HPTuners and I have a wideband. I've been tuning for about a year now and did a complete overhaul of my VE tables, PE, and recalibrated my MAF sensor. What a difference that made. I guess I'll get to try my hand at cam tuning come mid-summer! Rich, you up for guinnea pig if my bumpstick doesn't go in my car until mid-summer and yours is in come spring?

Thanks for the well educated responses guys!
Old 02-26-2006, 02:01 PM
  #19  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
LS1Zedder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I'll be a guinnea pig! My plan right now is to test it with just the headers and catted Y. Then I have 2 years to play. We'll hook up with Gary and run it off the grid till we get it right. Then right click and save as!
Old 02-26-2006, 03:14 PM
  #20  
Mat
Launching!
 
Mat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

That's the shizat! If we can tune yours to pass then we can tune mine. The TSP 224R on a 116 looks appealing.. what's the overlap on that one? Gotta be decent.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:08 AM.