What is the better bang for buck.
03-26-2006, 09:34 AM
#1
Launching!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South East, WI
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What is the better bang for buck. Im wondering if its cheaper/better (for more power) to do a cam and stroker kit or just go for a cam/heads install? Im guessing they are going to cost somewhere around the same but which is going to give the better bang for buck. Also if it matters the car will be sprayed every once and a while?
03-26-2006, 10:50 AM
#2
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (52)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Kingsland, GA
Posts: 1,354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would probably do heads and cam first (cheaper anyway). Plus its a lot easier to do! Stock bottom end is pretty strong...and there a guys putting down some BIG numbers with heads and cam on stock bottom end.
03-26-2006, 12:42 PM
#5
Launching!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South East, WI
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by freakynipples69
Another vote for a heads and cam setup. If you go big on the cam and get a nice set of heads, your looking at the 450rwhp range.
The only reasoned i asked was because arent heads like $1200ish?
03-26-2006, 01:08 PM
#6
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you can easily make 450rwhp with a big h/c setup AND if you have EVERY bolt on(whats in my sig). If you went with a FAST 90/90 setup you could probably hit 460.
Yes, heads range from $900-2500, depending on the company and how much they are ported.
Yes, heads range from $900-2500, depending on the company and how much they are ported.
