GMHTP LS2 Head Shootout - Now in easy-to-compare graph form courtesy of PianoProdigy
#1
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Tampa Bay Area, FL
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
GMHTP LS2 Head Shootout - Now in easy-to-compare graph form courtesy of PianoProdigy
I was looking at this article and found it pretty much worthless since they didn't take the time to overlay the dyno charts. During my 8 hours of TV watching on Sunday (football, football, 24), I decided to throw the results into my dyno comparison spreadsheet.
Enjoy!
Data taken from this page and the ones following: http://www.gmhightechperformance.com...ads/index.html
Enjoy!
Data taken from this page and the ones following: http://www.gmhightechperformance.com...ads/index.html
Trending Topics
#13
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
iTrader: (19)
I also thought that the low end torque was missing. But look at the size of the headers used, 1 7/8 compared to what most people use of 1 3/4. Also, I've seen that most of the people that make good power down low and overall with the AFR's have had them milled an run a thinner head gasket (0.040") to get the dcr up to better levels.
Thanks for putting this together. Once again it shows that a h/c package is more than just slapping together some parts. It really is a combination of all the parts being matched correctly.
Thanks for putting this together. Once again it shows that a h/c package is more than just slapping together some parts. It really is a combination of all the parts being matched correctly.
#16
TECH Addict
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Somewhere I Belong
Posts: 2,906
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nice job Alan & AFR proven Heads though and Tony M clarified the extra low end torque point > https://ls1tech.com/forums/showpost....5&postcount=71
peace
peace