Dragula Update: Something must not be right
My new dyno #'s are 452rwhp/531tq unlocked...
I make 450rwhp at 4500rpms, and the hp is flat from there to 6500.. and the peak is at 5500rwhp, </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">This is the problem. With a big cam you should gain more than 2 HP going from 4500 to 5500 rpm. Also 5500 rpm seems low for peak HP. Don't worry about weight or what is going on down low, this is where you have to look for your HP.
you took off about 300lbs and added about 140?
so 3240 plus you...what 180 or so? 3420? maybe 3440.
now lets ghetto it up...
drop the sfc's...15#
drop the mufflers...12-18" work, right?...15#
no need for airbags...thats about 25# w/ steering wheel
drop the big ol' tach and gay A/F gauge...2#
battery....25-30#
k-member you keep talking about....30-40#?
thats 100# easy.
I came in at 3490-3500 raceweight need to account for gas.
I have some more weight reduction in mind, I got one of those small batteries and plan to install new prototype VFN 4" ram air hood.
-----
Ragtop, what do you think is happening? Usually big tq and small hp = rich a/f to me. But i faxed u the dynosheets.
if you replace the O2's and go tune AGAIN and dont see 500rw locked and/or 10.xx. sent it back for a Wade-approved aluminum 422. mikey's car is FAST.
Ryan
Mikey = 436ci and SR. No idea on compression. But yeah he's moving good.
Roy how much surging at idle from a bad MAF? I get a fair amount of surging.
either way. lets analyze the difference. john, hyd. 422, iron, 3450-3500lbs., 4l60, right verter, 11.0. Mikey, solid 422, aluminum, 3400lbs, th350, wrong verter, 10.1!!!. .9 for 100-150lbs and a solid cam? surely the difference isnt the trans and cam only. what about terry running the same trans and gear but hitting 10.9 with 80 less cid and -300lbs? does that not add up to anyone else?
You can't just take a guess and then make a change unless you plan on doing this for the next 25 years to find the problem.
Look, you first rule out a mechanical problem.
Then you rule out a electronic problem.
Then tweak the motor and then tweak the chassis to take advantage of the power you have.
No exuse not to do this as it's simple routine testing.
Pulling more weight is fine if you think it's running perfect and you just need to eek out a little more from the combo.But it sure does not sound like that is your concern.
Steve
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Here is what I think you should do:
Throw in a stock descreened MAF
Throw on new stock plugwires
Throw in New NGK plugs (or whatever plugs you are running at whatever gap you usually run)
Put in that 3 inch Ypipe with DUAL 3 inch cutouts about 20 inches back from the primaries and run a regular 3 inch intermediate pipe and decent quiet muffler like the 2OTL (Just from our conversations about you not liking the noise level of the car)
Then I would throw in STOCK 98 Injectors and reflash the computer to a stock 98 A4 program and hit the dyno to retune everything.
Before strapping the car on the dyno do a compression test (though I doubt the short is hurt but you did run it with 15:! AF <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="gr_eek2.gif" /> )
Then dyno tune it with a mixture of 93 octane and 100 octane (like you would run it at the track) and put a FUEL pressure gauge on the car and ATAP the dyno as well.
Check out IAC, TPS, O2 switching etc etc.
Good luck man you'll get it figured out <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
Cheers,
Chris
<small>[ October 01, 2002, 02:57 PM: Message edited by: Chris ARE 360 ]</small>
DON'T make all those changes at once! Does history not teach us anything?
Chris, you should know better.
Is this a soap opera PSJ or are you serious about figuring out what's going on with you car?
<img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="gr_eek2.gif" />
Not all at once and run like a madman to the dyno LOL!
Cheers,
Chris
I can tell you pretty confidently Steve that I have no shortblock problems but hey I'll do a compression test, remember the heads were off like a few weeks ago and the pistons looked fine and the engine consumes no fluids.
Yeah there is a huge gap 'tween me and Mikey for sure don't look at the ET since I don't have a transbrake and a S/E converter just look at the mph that's the problem.
It's possible that whatever the problem is shows up under the true load I have at the track on the 28" slicks vs on a dynojet.
PSJ has the "lead" top option. Looks like a gutted lightweight Formula, but has hidden lead in the body....and under the hood? <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
I still want to get both of our cars on the same scale. My car has to weigh 3800 lbs based on his scale and level of "drag pimping" hehe.
WANTED: PSJ's missing horsepower!
Try a bigger header. I picked up huge power going from the TTS to the 1 7/8 Dynatech. See my dyno graphs below to see the comparison. I can't guarantee results but its worth a try with your setup. BTW as far as the 9" sucking up power is concerned... I lost 21RWHP going from the stock 10 bolt to the 9" with 4.57's. Thats 4%...
Shane
I'll replace my wires once a year from now on. Your wires are getting old, just replace 'em.
<small>[ October 01, 2002, 06:18 PM: Message edited by: MelloYellow ]</small>
Either change the tires or the gear.
Go from there.
Your drive line might be sucking HP.
513 RWTQ is awesome.
Didn't I see a thread with a guy with an ARE 422 pretty much the same combo
as you running 11.3x's?or am I confused?
or-spray a 200 shot.
Or wait for a cool,dry day for 10.8x's @124-125.



