Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Previous MAC owners ... MAC's to LT's ... please come in.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-05-2007, 05:13 AM
  #1  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (32)
 
JEB99TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,712
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default Previous MAC owners ... MAC's to LT's ... please come in.

Three questions I need your help with. I have to decide this weekend ... car's already in the shop waiting.

1. How much more power did you make going from MAC's to long tubes ?

2. Are your LT's 1 3/4" or 1 7/8" primaries?

3. On a scale of 1-5 ... how would you rate your level of satisfaction by stepping up to LT's?


Right now I have well ported MAC 3/4 mid-length headers with 1 5/8" primaries and a MAC ORY with a Flowmaster junction.

I'm thinking Kooks headers with Kooks ORY with 1 7/8" primaries will push my power band up higher where I need it most. With my A4 and 3600 stall, there's too much unusable power down low.
Old 04-05-2007, 07:21 AM
  #2  
8 Sec Tuner
iTrader: (2)
 
Mike TexaSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Wish I was in a boat fishing...
Posts: 4,641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Kooks is worth at least 10 rwhp over the MAC's.
Old 04-05-2007, 08:54 AM
  #3  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
dub.ya.es.SICK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

not werth it IMO buy somthing more beneficial
Old 04-05-2007, 09:17 AM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (40)
 
marv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Scottsboro, AL
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I just switched from Macs to Kooks LTs...no new numbers yet though.

I'm hoping to see anywhere from 5-10 more hp from the LTs as well as more torque.

I went with the 1 3/4" X 3" SS race headers and 3" SS ORY...very impressed with the Kooks quality and fitment.
Old 04-05-2007, 02:00 PM
  #5  
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Studytime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BTR, La
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It seems that there are still people who can't wrap their brains around header primary tube theory. A LT header will not dyno with higher peak numbers than a set of MAC midlength headers. The smaller y-pipe might hold back numbers slightly, but just the header tube difference in length is NOT going to affect peak rwhp numbers.

There have been numerous people swap and pickup ZERO gains in peak rwhp.

Ben T.
Old 04-05-2007, 02:03 PM
  #6  
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Studytime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BTR, La
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JEB99TA
Right now I have... MAC headers... with 1 5/8" primaries and a MAC ORY with a Flowmaster junction.

I'm thinking Kooks headers with Kooks ORY with 1 7/8" primaries will push my power band up higher where I need it most. With my A4 and 3600 stall, there's too much unusable power down low.
Since when does MAC make a 1 5/8" header?

You want your power band pushed up higher? Go with SHORTER header tubes. They'll up the rpm range of the motor. A longer header tube will INCREASE LOW END performance- not top end pull.

Ben T.
Old 04-05-2007, 02:45 PM
  #7  
Staging Lane
 
lt1_fool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Not another LT vs shorty thread again...
Old 04-05-2007, 07:53 PM
  #8  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
 
gillbot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: East Palestine, OH - USA
Posts: 2,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lt1_fool
Not another LT vs shorty thread again...
looks that way, besides macs are a mid length header not a shorty.
Old 04-05-2007, 08:52 PM
  #9  
On The Tree
iTrader: (15)
 
streetlegalls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Studytime
It seems that there are still people who can't wrap their brains around header primary tube theory. A LT header will not dyno with higher peak numbers than a set of MAC midlength headers. The smaller y-pipe might hold back numbers slightly, but just the header tube difference in length is NOT going to affect peak rwhp numbers.

There have been numerous people swap and pickup ZERO gains in peak rwhp.

Ben T.
Old 04-05-2007, 08:56 PM
  #10  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (32)
 
JEB99TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,712
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Studytime
Since when does MAC make a 1 5/8" header?

Ben T.
... you get the point, I'm sure. Inside diameter is 1 5/8" ... so that's what I call 'em.



Looks like I'm not seeing the worth of paying $1,500 to change up ... except for the fact I'd have nice stainless Kooks 1 7/8 headers. Guess I'll hold off until the nitrous kit goes on this summer and just do it all at once because I'll then need them.
Old 04-05-2007, 09:13 PM
  #11  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
SSNISTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The sound of LT's are worth it alone IMO.
Old 04-05-2007, 10:23 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (147)
 
Ego Killer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Tullahoma,Tn
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I went from macs with a cutout to pacesetters with TDs with 1chambers and it was a waste of money ran no better..it did however sound better
Old 04-06-2007, 12:05 AM
  #13  
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Studytime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BTR, La
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JEB99TA
... you get the point, I'm sure. Inside diameter is 1 5/8" ... so that's what I call 'em.
No dude, I have MACs on my car currently and I'm trying to tell you they are 1 3/4" tubes. They really are not that bad.

Ben T.
Old 04-06-2007, 05:19 AM
  #14  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (32)
 
JEB99TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,712
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Studytime
No dude, I have MACs on my car currently and I'm trying to tell you they are 1 3/4" tubes. They really are not that bad.

Ben T.
Yeah, I've loved my MACS a lot and for a very long time. The sound of my exhaust is exactly what I strived for through 5 different exhaust changes from Borla adjustable to cutouts to true Duals to what I currently have now. Previously, I had Random tech bullet cats welded in my old MAC Y to eliminate the rasp ... TWO DIFFERENT TIMES!

It's pretty loud and I have no cats ... ZERO rasp whatsoever ... just MAC's, MAC ORY with Flowmaster junction, and Magnaflow single-chamber muffler Catback. Frequently, I get comments form the Cobra folks becuase they can't believe how good it sounds.

I was just thinking of more power, but, doesn't appear up where I need it ... the 90/90/90 setup put me about where I need to be ... was thinking better air intake would further complete that goal. Not the tube length, necessarily.

Well, the debate will ALWAYS go on, I guess. Just started this thread hoping to hear from somebody who has stepped up from MAC's to the 1 7/8 LT world. Haven't heard anything that's very convincing .... seen some dynographs, but, the weather/temps and days were different and the differences weren't enough to really say the comparisons were accurate.

This all being said, I still love my MAC's, as cheap as they are. After 4 years on the car, I would say they are in far better shape than any non-stainless headers I've ever seen which are that old.

Thanks for the for responding and I guess I'll be keeping the MAC's ... at least until summer when the nitrous goes on.
Old 04-06-2007, 07:55 AM
  #15  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (10)
 
WS6Drop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I think for the money could be better spent on something else possibly.
Old 04-06-2007, 08:26 AM
  #16  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (8)
 
jaguar5822's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What about if the car is lowered? Then is it better just to compromise by getting some mids? I'm thinking about getting some headers, and other than wanting the car to have emissions in tact in case I ever sell it . I live in Ohio where the majority of the state currently has no emissions testing . I have an electric cutout as well if that affects anything.
Old 04-06-2007, 08:54 AM
  #17  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
GregWS6&z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Portsmouth, VA
Posts: 2,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

the MACS dont affect ground clearance




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:32 AM.