Help me pick a cam & make a parts list
#242
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Well I didn't break 400 but I would have if I had a UD pulley or didn't have a K&N which I wasn't aware that it lost power, or if I would have farted in the intake, or put more air in the back tires, etc. Its a great cam though I'm going to make a thread tommorow night when I get my dyno sheet scanned. I got a dyno video but its so loud in there its just really distorted. Its in my videos on youtube.
#244
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Well I didn't break 400 but I would have if I had a UD pulley or didn't have a K&N which I wasn't aware that it lost power, or if I would have farted in the intake, or put more air in the back tires, etc. Its a great cam though I'm going to make a thread tommorow night when I get my dyno sheet scanned. I got a dyno video but its so loud in there its just really distorted. Its in my videos on youtube.
#246
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (24)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Well I didn't break 400 but I would have if I had a UD pulley or didn't have a K&N which I wasn't aware that it lost power, or if I would have farted in the intake, or put more air in the back tires, etc. Its a great cam though I'm going to make a thread tommorow night when I get my dyno sheet scanned. I got a dyno video but its so loud in there its just really distorted. Its in my videos on youtube.
#248
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA (Pittsburg)
Posts: 4,240
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Icon Lol](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_lol.gif)
Well I didn't break 400 but I would have if I had a UD pulley or didn't have a K&N which I wasn't aware that it lost power, or if I would have farted in the intake, or put more air in the back tires, etc. Its a great cam though I'm going to make a thread tommorow night when I get my dyno sheet scanned. I got a dyno video but its so loud in there its just really distorted. Its in my videos on youtube.
My cam is a 230/232 .612/.595 111+3 (i can't remember the exact advance but i think its +3)
#250
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA (Pittsburg)
Posts: 4,240
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
As soon as he spec'd this cam for me i knew it was the one. It was right in the range i wanted. Remember you don't want to spin the motor to high. If you DD the car it won't feel powerful because you'll always be out of powerband.
#253
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It was a dynojet.
I ended up making 397 whp and 377 trq. It makes 350 + ft lbs from 3500 to 6000 but what surprised me is how it holds power after peak. I don't see why you would need a bigger cam unless your trying to rev past 6750. The only reason I'm disapointed is because I wanted to break 400 but I understand why I didn't, I could put a UD pulley and a paper filter on it and probably make up in the 410-420 range. But it pulls great from bottom to top its not peaky at all. I'll post a thread up tonight in the dyno section and you guys can see what I'm talking about and give your thoughts.
I ended up making 397 whp and 377 trq. It makes 350 + ft lbs from 3500 to 6000 but what surprised me is how it holds power after peak. I don't see why you would need a bigger cam unless your trying to rev past 6750. The only reason I'm disapointed is because I wanted to break 400 but I understand why I didn't, I could put a UD pulley and a paper filter on it and probably make up in the 410-420 range. But it pulls great from bottom to top its not peaky at all. I'll post a thread up tonight in the dyno section and you guys can see what I'm talking about and give your thoughts.
#255
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by pat g
If you want something that makes even more power and driveability is not a concern, this would be even nastier:
236/236 .615/.607 110LSA +4 using Comp XFI lobes.
236/236 .615/.607 110LSA +4 using Comp XFI lobes.