224/232 .585/590 opinion
#1
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: St. Augustine FL
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
224/232 .585/590 opinion
Engine is an lq9 with ported and milled l92 heads milled .030 with ported Ls3 intake and longtubes looking at this cam 224 / 232 .585 on a 114 LSA Let me know what you think
Last edited by Quick99TransAm; 01-10-2011 at 10:57 AM.
#4
TECH Enthusiast
Not bad.... I take it XER lobes?
Should be around 0 overlap
The ported part is the only thing I see that could be an issue.....
The port quality is subjective to the porter and how maticulous they are with the porting...... If you have not ported them yet, I would not and I did not, especially for a 6.0.....
Just mill em....
Pick your camshaft timing events based on intent, street,strip,drag,weekend warrior,low end, mid range, top end, max effort, etc....... I would not pick based on a max effort for a dyno.....
Too many dyno cams going around........lol
Another thing I find guys leave out to make their cars quicker, they forget about gears and converter.....
Hell if you took a stock motor and changed out the rear gears and converter, it will 9 times out of 10 run like a completely different car and be much faster ie going from stock to a 3000 stall and 3.23/3.42 to 3.73-3.90......
just a side note.....
Bozz
Should be around 0 overlap
The ported part is the only thing I see that could be an issue.....
The port quality is subjective to the porter and how maticulous they are with the porting...... If you have not ported them yet, I would not and I did not, especially for a 6.0.....
Just mill em....
Pick your camshaft timing events based on intent, street,strip,drag,weekend warrior,low end, mid range, top end, max effort, etc....... I would not pick based on a max effort for a dyno.....
Too many dyno cams going around........lol
Another thing I find guys leave out to make their cars quicker, they forget about gears and converter.....
Hell if you took a stock motor and changed out the rear gears and converter, it will 9 times out of 10 run like a completely different car and be much faster ie going from stock to a 3000 stall and 3.23/3.42 to 3.73-3.90......
just a side note.....
Bozz
#5
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
That's fairly close to what I'm sticking in my vette. 226/234 115 112
I'm expecting a 40 - 50 HP bump and hopefully close to stock driving manners when tuned.
A 3000+ stall converter would definitely help you. If you have no plans to get a higher stall, you'll want to advance that cam to get power down low.
I'm expecting a 40 - 50 HP bump and hopefully close to stock driving manners when tuned.
A 3000+ stall converter would definitely help you. If you have no plans to get a higher stall, you'll want to advance that cam to get power down low.
#6
TECH Regular
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Your GF's pants
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you're willing to take the time and money to swap yourself in a 2900ish + converter, that frees up lots and lots of GREAT cam choices that are slightly more rowdy but still have a few table manners.
Trending Topics
#8
Launching!
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: northern indiana
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
too big for a stock converter.i would go with something smaller,but that's just my .02.i had a 220 cam,114lsa(347ci LS1) with the stock TQ in there for a few days before i had a 3000 stall installed,and it was soggy out of the hole.ask one of the sponsors to spec you something out for your needs,you will be a lot happier.
#9
Launching!
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: northern indiana
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Another thing I find guys leave out to make their cars quicker, they forget about gears and converter.....
Hell if you took a stock motor and changed out the rear gears and converter, it will 9 times out of 10 run like a completely different car and be much faster ie going from stock to a 3000 stall and 3.23/3.42 to 3.73-3.90......
just a side note.....
Bozz