Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

So I want to build an engine to optimize gas mileage....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-30-2013, 08:00 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
fasteddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: So Cal
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default So I want to build an engine to optimize gas mileage....

Its a Z28 with a 5.7....gets around 15 city and 26 hwy...Auto trans...not tuned and not bad.....v6's get a little more, not much more either.

Its my son's car but it has a bad lifter @110K miles.....

I want to build an engine that optimizes gas mileage. (cuz I pay the bill)

Should I stay with the 5.7 or drop down to a 5.3. My tahoe with an iron 5.3gets 15/20 avg and it weighs 5200lbs.

I'd like to see it I can get to 20/30 which is about a 30%/10% improvement.
I know thats a stretch type goal, but any thoughts would help.


The strategy would be to increase compression, increase airflow, and decrease the fuel.

So I was thinking a 5.3 with 243 heads and what manifold? should I use the LS6 or the truck one?

Any thoughts would be helpful.....NO TURBOs....
Even tuning thoughts.....like set the limiter at 5K.
Any cam thoughts?
Use narrow tires...pulls less tread...less friction.
Use taller gears...it has 273s now....
Old 09-30-2013, 08:19 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
lil john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Studewood/Acres-Homes TX.
Posts: 1,137
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Is the car a stock ls1 engine if so work with it 1st....take what is written and apply it.....if not.........5.3 with stock cam/Call to see if they can make a more efficient custom cam, free flowing exhaust= duals, 4speed trans look at the 4th gear ratios 4l80 has the worst as far as 4th but it is the *best 4 speed in terms of power handling. 3.23-3.08 rear gear 3.43 would be best ..not making power/ going up a hill and a 3.08 rear. Compression should be in the under 10.0 range or right at it. Maybe hand port the heads/chamber work for a little Extra Hp and it helps promote better fuel atomization.Intake, a good hand porting to get better air flow....but 26mpg is really good but this would help....Also a good tuner can help more than u think
Old 09-30-2013, 09:05 PM
  #3  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
fasteddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: So Cal
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

26 mpg at 70mph on level freeway.
15.5 in city driving.
Measured with the ultra gauge.....trip/usage is approx the avg.


OK...I can live with that strategy.....
Leave bottom end alone for right now....

Port the heads....
Port the intake....
What about the throttle body? will porting it make a diff?
How much compression can I run and still use 87 octane?

Find an efficient "good gas mileage" cam ...... ? I've never even heard of that.

Then tune it.
Old 09-30-2013, 09:53 PM
  #4  
Banned
 
lil john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Studewood/Acres-Homes TX.
Posts: 1,137
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Well on the cam U could talk to some 1 like Tick to see if it's possible to do a cam that is more EFF. than a stock 1.
now on Compression...I no whats recommended for ole SBC...but with computer and EFI.....Vengence,LME,TSP would be a good start to find out how much true comp can be run but I'm thinking around 10 if not the old 9.5 compression ratio...although EFI helps this a lot. You want the engine to flow as smooth as water running...going in & coming out... get rid of all dead weight except for dummy tire and jack
Old 09-30-2013, 11:11 PM
  #5  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
allan808's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Youl be spending more money on gas with all those parts!
Old 09-30-2013, 11:34 PM
  #6  
Banned
 
lil john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Studewood/Acres-Homes TX.
Posts: 1,137
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

True but he asked....better exhaust and a good tune with a 3.42 gear should get him there but he asked so.....I gave him the bucket list of things that could help Fuel economy, in Houston TX gas is 3.02-.10 a gallon reg. and some places as low as 2.95. And trust me, my cousin & I know MPG try driving from Houston to Key Port, NJ then to NY followed by Canton Ohio and return home to Houston in a GM 2500 trk. with a 5.7 TBI 4l80 trans and a 4.10 gear....I really like the trans and gear the truck uses.....Thinking my Malibu will love it also with 3.90 gear and less weight....Also more HP..got the trans in the garage and rear-end gear is in the car.

Last edited by lil john; 09-30-2013 at 11:47 PM.
Old 10-01-2013, 06:27 AM
  #7  
Teching In
 
drillbabydrill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Abilene, Texas
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

As long as you have that V8 in there you're not gonna get great gas mileage. You can build whatever you want but when he gets behind the wheel and in town and you aren't there....it's still a Z28 with a V8!!!
Old 10-01-2013, 07:46 AM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
 
Exidous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Under a rock
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Close to stock cam with AFR 205 heads. Higher port velocity with a slightly taller gear should get you a couple MPG. Once you go over 210cc on the heads (stock size) and a bigger than stock cam you WILL lose MPG but gain HP.

Many report increased MPG at cruise and HP at fat foot with the AFR 205's. A couple MPG at best though. Probably not enough to justify even the used $1500+ price.
Old 10-01-2013, 09:14 AM
  #9  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (5)
 
redtan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Belmont, MA
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Get a 4.8 with milled heads. Toss a set of tiny turbos on it.

Hello 35+ mpg.
Old 10-01-2013, 10:20 AM
  #10  
Teching In
 
drillbabydrill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Abilene, Texas
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

^^^ agree. I had the base 4.8 in my 2006 silverado and was seeing 25 mpg. I don't see you getting much better than that!
Old 10-01-2013, 12:32 PM
  #11  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
SSCamaro99_3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ballwin, MO
Posts: 2,551
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

The nice part of me says:

How many miles does your son drive per week? We can run some numbers and see if this even makes financial sense.

The not so nce part says:

What is the point of downbuilding a Z28 to pick up a small amount of gas mileage? Go buy something else.


In all honesty:

Right now you are at 15/26. To make the math easy assume a 50/50 split = 20.5mpg average. 20/30 will get you a 25 mpg avg. If you sone drives 10,000 miles per year he will use:

10000/20.5 = 487.8 gallons @ 3.25 = $1585.35 in fuel
10000/25 = 400 gallns @ 3.25 = 1300.00 in fuel

If you are fortunate enough to hit your goal, which out doubt especially the 20 in the city, you are going to save $285.35 in fuel per year. Is it really worth it to sacrifice a ton of performance to meet this goal.
Old 10-01-2013, 02:37 PM
  #12  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (11)
 
87silverbullet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Slidell,LA
Posts: 4,873
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Smaller motors are not always the best idea. When you have a smaller motor trying to lug around the weight of what a bigger motor was doing, you will find the smaller motor burning just as much or more than the bigger motor.
Old 10-01-2013, 04:02 PM
  #13  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (5)
 
redtan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Belmont, MA
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Smaller motors are not always the best idea. When you have a smaller motor trying to lug around the weight of what a bigger motor was doing, you will find the smaller motor burning just as much or more than the bigger motor.
That's why you add turbos
Old 10-01-2013, 04:22 PM
  #14  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (11)
 
87silverbullet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Slidell,LA
Posts: 4,873
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by redtan
That's why you add turbos
Yes I agree, but my rate of return just went in the dumpster with that notion.
Old 10-01-2013, 04:55 PM
  #15  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
thunderstruck507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest AR
Posts: 8,357
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

put in new lifters (stock or mild cam too if its junked), maybe mill the heads while they're off, get a good tune and leave the rest alone...
Old 10-01-2013, 05:06 PM
  #16  
Teching In
 
drillbabydrill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Abilene, Texas
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

By the time you do everything these guys are talking about you've spent a years worth of gas money.
Old 10-01-2013, 09:45 PM
  #17  
Banned
 
lil john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Studewood/Acres-Homes TX.
Posts: 1,137
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

.better exhaust and a good tune with a 3.42 gear should get him there
Old 10-02-2013, 01:17 AM
  #18  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
fasteddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: So Cal
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I agree.....payback on the money spent is probably 5+ years out which by then the car will most have moved on.....and he only drives to school and BBall games.....so he uses a tank about every 2-3 weeks.

It's just an engineering project.....instead of maximizing TQ/HP....thought it would be fun to max gas mileage. I don't live in TX where gas is $2.95/gallon....I live in Socal and its $4 if you're lucky.....2.95? sheesh.

.......and "nice" V6 4th gens are very hard to find....they are either destroyed or people won't give em up....trust me I've looked....came to the conclusion that the diff in gas mileage isn't worth looking forever and the diff in performance.

Thanks for the thought.....I'll post an update when the lifter gets fixed and tune for milegage goes in.
Old 10-02-2013, 06:12 AM
  #19  
Launching!
 
Busted Knuckles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Short stroke, big bore is the most efficient engine, partly because of lower parasitic drag losses. Smaller ports = higher velocity, better cylinder fill.

Best way to improve mileage is to bolt a 2x4 on the floor under the gas pedal.
Old 10-02-2013, 10:23 AM
  #20  
Teching In
 
drillbabydrill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Abilene, Texas
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

$4 a gallon!? That's insane!!! Ill stay in Texas ha!


Quick Reply: So I want to build an engine to optimize gas mileage....



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:07 PM.