Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Fast 102 intake vs stock lS3 on a near stock engine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-13-2014, 03:52 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
bjankuski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Fast 102 intake vs stock lS3 on a near stock engine

I have a near stock 6.2 LS3 (219/235 comp cam and headers) in a 2000 Z-28 and was wondering if it was worth it to switch the stock intake to a fast 102 or ?

Any opinions?
Old 05-13-2014, 05:22 PM
  #2  
11 Second Club
 
BODUKE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 545
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Keep the Ls3 intake it flows very well. I did the same swap and I am happy with it. Imop the Fast 102 is overhyped, overpriced and doesn't really flow any better than a stock Ls3 intake.
Old 05-13-2014, 05:29 PM
  #3  
TECH Regular
 
Dyno Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Do you have a dyno sheet with both manifolds?
Old 05-13-2014, 06:29 PM
  #4  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (88)
 
Burken01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Anaheim, Ca
Posts: 2,923
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Dyno Junkie
Do you have a dyno sheet with both manifolds?
I've been searching this as well, seems that the fast 102 isn't as big of an upgrade on the ls3 engine as it is on a ls2 engine for instance..

many things to be taken into consideration, so I'm still reading up on it too!



Quick Reply: Fast 102 intake vs stock lS3 on a near stock engine



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:55 AM.