1sick_eg

Hey guys,

Just finished up my FRH ported ls3 heads and Cam Motion Low Lash Solid with Jesel rockers. I'll be doing a detailed thread in a few days, but I thought some of you may want to hear the music.

Edit:

Dyno results are in 542whp/484wtq

Edit:551whp 504wtq

This car on this same dyno on the previous hydraulic cam with stock heads made 475whp/436wtq

Mods:

Cam Motion Low Lash Solid roller 236/246 114lsa
FRH stage 1 cnc ls3 heads
Jesel Sportsman roller rockers
BTR 660 spring kit
ADM intake
Kooks 1 7/8" headers
No cats
3" Corsa
ATI 10%

Stock ls3 intake and throttle body.
Stock compression/bore/stroke

Jontall

Sounds great.

Lawhead

iTrader: (14)

I want to see the numbers on this!!! Wish I could watch videos

1sick_eg

Thanks guys. Sorry, I fixed the link. I posted on my phone so I didn't realize I didn't embed the video.

BOLO

iTrader: (40)

Nice!Sounds like popcorn popping!

hiltsy855

iTrader: (35)

This thread is worthless without cam specs LOL!!!!!!!! Sounds great!

S10xGN

iTrader: (11)

In for it! I've got one of Kip's LLSR's going together later this year. Cathedral-headed L92 416" stroker with a 244°/249°, 0.649"/0.624" on a 112° LSA with T&D rockers. Something tells me yours is "talkin' louder" than mine will...

1sick_eg

Lol sorry guys. Cam specs if I remember correctly off the top of my head are 236/246 .63x/.62x 114lsa. I know it was around 12.8 degrees of overlap.

1sick_eg

I'll be sure to post numbers as soon. As I know. I can't find dyno time anywhere. Starting to frustrate me.

SHovV

iTrader: (1)

Sounds nice. Hearing yours makes me more anxious to get mine lit. 250/266 .720/.680 114+4. It's going in a 440 w/ FRH LS7 heads.

Lawhead

iTrader: (14)

Seems like my cam is bigger than a lot of these that I see at

251/271 .700/.680 113 going in my 370

S10xGN

iTrader: (11)

Depends on what you're looking for. I told Kip I wanted a good torquey all-street engine with a 6500 RPM red line that would be fun (and easy) to drive with a 4 speed and 3.25 gear...

BOLO

iTrader: (40)

Absolutely correct^ it all depends on what you're trying to do. POWER is mostly dependent on the HEADS.

carbuff

iTrader: (8)

Would someone educate me on what it means to have a Low Lash solid roller? I've had an old-school solid roller before where I set hot lash on the rockers. Is the procedure the same with a 'low lash' setup? And if so, I presume that means that adjustable rockers are required?

Seems a simple question, but I'm curious if there is any difference vs. what I'm familiar with on the regular solid rollers...

1sick_eg

Exactly. I was pretty happy with my previous hydraulic cam 232/238 .621/.603 113 lsa +3 Made 484/444 on a load bearing dyno(wasn't mustang) and felt great on the street. I wanted something slightly bigger, but didn't want to give up too much low end because this is still a street car/ road course car.
Same deal really. Just tighter tolerances. On my aluminum block/aluminum heads, I have the lash set at .000 cold. It's around .007 once warm.

Edit: Did I mention it's insanely quiet? It puts hydraulic rollers to shame.

CAMSTER

iTrader: (10)

Sound of choice music Sick, love that tune lol what compression, mufflers and roller lifters did you go with.

speedtigger

iTrader: (16)

The Cam Motion LLR is one of the best purchases I have made since getting into LS engines. Quiet valve train and more power. Win.

high impact

iTrader: (5)

I am another low lash solid roller lover. LOL I will start a new thread soon also. I just got off the dyno with a new turbo build and made 871 rwhp on a conservative tune and a boost controller that wasn't cooperating. You will not regret buying Kip's LLSR

CAMSTER

iTrader: (10)

Is that the same as the PGLL lobe,

carbuff

iTrader: (8)

Thanx. Are there any reasonably priced options for adjustable rockers which are preferred for these setups?

The second comment is interesting. Quiet? Not sure I would have expected that. Makes me almost wish I had read this about a month ago when selecting my cam. Almost...