Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Ls2 403 with L92 heads looking for improvement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-31-2016, 02:31 AM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Justin93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Canfield,Oh
Posts: 269
Received 18 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Well, I finally got my 403 build done and tuned back in May. After driving it for a few months I'm fairly happy with it but I came far short of my goal of at least 500whp. I've attached the Dyno sheet below. Car made 467 434 on a know to be stingy mustang Dyno. The car just doesn't feel very torquey to me and seems to run out of steam faster than I'd like. I spoke with btr where I bought my cam and they are insisting 1 7/8 headers will really open this setup up, but I'm a little skeptical of this. I kind of feel maybe the cam is leaving some on the table. With all the voodoo floating around out there on cam selection for rectangle port heads I'm not sure now if I made the right choice. Looking for suggestions as to what I could do to improve this setup and gain some hp and torque. Looking to keep it n/a. My current setup is listed below. Car is tuned on speed density. Thanks for the help

2006 GTO 6speed manual Ls2 block -Full Manley 403 rotating assembly with -4cc flat tops with reliefs -Rings gapped for N/a - Johnson 2110 lifters @ .035 preload -stock rockers with trunion upgrade -Stock L92 heads with btr .660 springs -Stock LS3 .051 thick head gaskets -static compression 10.9:1 -Btr N/a stroker cam Cam specs are 239/254 .624"/.595" 114+3. -Fast 102 lsxr manifold with NW102 throttle body -Pacesetter 1 3/4 headers with catless mids to custom 3in exhaust -stock ls3 injectors currently at 92% duty cycle. New 70Lb injectors and dw265 fuel pump waiting to go in. Ls2 403 with L92 heads looking for improvement-image-1477982946.jpg
Old 08-31-2016, 05:15 AM
  #2  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,848
Received 307 Likes on 207 Posts

Default

The torque seems low for a 400ci engine with almost 11:1, even for a mustang dyno I would check to make sure there isn't something wrong, like a dead cylinder or the cam installed on the wrong centerlines.

The cam doesn't really seem like it's way out in left field or anything. You could advance it and see if that picks up any low end torque. You could mill the the heads some more to get the compression ratio up as well.
Old 08-31-2016, 05:32 AM
  #3  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Justin93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Canfield,Oh
Posts: 269
Received 18 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by KCS
The torque seems low for a 400ci engine with almost 11:1, even for a mustang dyno I would check to make sure there isn't something wrong, like a dead cylinder or the cam installed on the wrong centerlines. The cam doesn't really seem like it's way out in left field or anything. You could advance it and see if that picks up any low end torque. You could mill the the heads some more to get the compression ratio up as well.
Funny that you mention, dead cylinder, I'm having a drivability issue with bucking between 1500-2000rpm under steady throttle. The tuner has attempted several revisions and it hasn't gotten better. I'll run a compression check tonight.

As far as cam timing I'm 900% sure it went in straight up. Verified it with a degree wheel 3 times so I could calm my ocd lol
Old 08-31-2016, 02:34 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,584
Received 1,431 Likes on 991 Posts

Default

It's a long shot but I would confirm the TB blade is opening all the way as part of the trouble shooting.
Old 08-31-2016, 04:22 PM
  #5  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Justin93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Canfield,Oh
Posts: 269
Received 18 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 99 Black Bird T/A
It's a long shot but I would confirm the TB blade is opening all the way as part of the trouble shooting.
I thought only the first run of nick Williams 102's had this issue?
Old 09-01-2016, 05:15 AM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,584
Received 1,431 Likes on 991 Posts

Default

I'm sure that's that probably the case but my experience has been it's best to check or have some one check rather than assume an item is set up correctly. That's based on getting a set of cylinder heads that were "ready to bolt on" that had metal shavings in the intake ports, a new carb that had part of the link installed backwards that would lock the secondaries open at wide open throttle, a couple of new but defective Accel ignition modules, buying a new crate motor that had a half dozen issues that should have been caught by the builder and so on. Just a few lessons I learned about trusting parts to be correct.
Old 09-01-2016, 07:15 AM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
 
MuhThugga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wilmington, De
Posts: 1,671
Received 228 Likes on 153 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Justin93
Funny that you mention, dead cylinder, I'm having a drivability issue with bucking between 1500-2000rpm under steady throttle. The tuner has attempted several revisions and it hasn't gotten better. I'll run a compression check tonight.
That's due to the cam's 19* of overlap. No amount of tuning is going to fix that issue. The larger LS3/L92 intake valve just doesn't play well with a lot of overlap and intake reversion starts to occur in that RPM range. The only way to fix it is to install a camshaft with less overlap.

Trust me. Been there. Done that. I went from 20* of overlap to 5*. I lost 10 peak HP, gained 50 ft lbs on the bottom end, and the car drives so much nicer.


What intake and MAF are you using?

Last edited by MuhThugga; 09-01-2016 at 07:28 AM.
Old 09-01-2016, 07:19 AM
  #8  
TECH Veteran
 
Tuskyz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 4,742
Received 534 Likes on 382 Posts
Default

The Ls3 head is VERY picky on cam choice due to the big *** valves in those heads.... hard to tune also from what I hear espically with the a/c on.
Old 09-01-2016, 04:29 PM
  #9  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
KW Baraka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: S.A., TX
Posts: 2,180
Received 130 Likes on 99 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MuhThugga
That's due to the cam's 19* of overlap. No amount of tuning is going to fix that issue........

.......Trust me. Been there. Done that. I went from 20* of overlap to 5*. I lost 10 peak HP, gained 50 ft lbs on the bottom end, and the car drives so much nicer......
Agreed. I have 18* of overlap and I'm gonna swap my cam as well. My car does a good bit of bucking and surging....my new cam will have right about 7* overlap.

Also.....are your pistons in of out of the cylinders at TDC? A .051" head gasket is kinda thick and not optimal for good quench if the piston is in the hole.

KW
Old 09-01-2016, 05:11 PM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
 
NAVYBLUE210's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Coast of San Mateo County Between Pacifica & HMB
Posts: 1,815
Received 215 Likes on 128 Posts

Default

My .02
Smaller Cam something like ~ 231*/243* 114*+3* same lifts.
(12* E split good for stock LS3 heads up to ~ 6500 rpm NA)
1 7/8" LTs Definetely!
.030 Head Gaskets, up to 11.5:1 Comp.
Since you have the fast 102 already get the mid length runners
Easy enough to swap out. Should pump 12-15+ @ Peak +300-500 RPM
and carry 300-500 beyond peak with little fall off compared to
Stock runners, might be 30-45+ HP @ 7000 compared to now.
No expert, worth what you paid for it LOL.
Old 09-01-2016, 05:37 PM
  #11  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Sales2@Texas-speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas!
Posts: 5,053
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I'm betting there's an easy 10-15rwhp in those headers, going to a 1 7/8
__________________


Largest Stocking Distributor of LS-x Engines / CHECK OUT OUR NEW WEBSITE!

COMP - FAST - PACESETTER - DIAMOND RACING - EAGLE SPECIALTY PRODUCTS - CALLIES - COMETIC GASKETS
RAM CLUTCHES - MOSER ENGINEERING - KOOK'S HEADERS - ARP - GM BOLTS AND GASKETS - MSD - NGK
POWERBOND - ASP - AND MORE!
Old 09-01-2016, 08:34 PM
  #12  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Justin93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Canfield,Oh
Posts: 269
Received 18 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MuhThugga
That's due to the cam's 19* of overlap. No amount of tuning is going to fix that issue. The larger LS3/L92 intake valve just doesn't play well with a lot of overlap and intake reversion starts to occur in that RPM range. The only way to fix it is to install a camshaft with less overlap. Trust me. Been there. Done that. I went from 20* of overlap to 5*. I lost 10 peak HP, gained 50 ft lbs on the bottom end, and the car drives so much nicer. What intake and MAF are you using?
I'm speed density tuned with an over the rad style intake.
Old 09-01-2016, 08:38 PM
  #13  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Justin93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Canfield,Oh
Posts: 269
Received 18 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by KW Baraka
Agreed. I have 18* of overlap and I'm gonna swap my cam as well. My car does a good bit of bucking and surging....my new cam will have right about 7* overlap. Also.....are your pistons in of out of the cylinders at TDC? A .051" head gasket is kinda thick and not optimal for good quench if the piston is in the hole. KW
My Pistons were in the hole. Forget by how much. I agree. I'm thinking quench is a big part of this
Old 09-02-2016, 06:53 AM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
 
MuhThugga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wilmington, De
Posts: 1,671
Received 228 Likes on 153 Posts

Default

If your pistons are in the hole, then you are looking at .051" + below deck for a quench. So, you probably have somewhere around .060" of quench. That's huge. Try getting the quench between .035" and .045", and you should see significant gains with timing adjustments.
Old 09-07-2016, 02:42 PM
  #15  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Justin93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Canfield,Oh
Posts: 269
Received 18 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Well did the compression check. All cylinders at between 195 and 200. I did find two plugs with the porcelain cracked as well as one not threaded in all the way. Guess I should have supervised better when my buddies were helping me finish it up.

Any way I'm probably going to pop the heads off when I'm home again and switch to a .030 compressed thickness gasket to get the quench back down. I've been looking at cometic's site as well as Google trying to find a LS 4.085 bore head gasket with .030 compressed thickness but have had no luck. Would the 4.060 bore gaskets work ok on an l92 head?
Old 09-07-2016, 03:34 PM
  #16  
"I MAID THEESE"
iTrader: (3)
 
Mavn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,744
Received 675 Likes on 425 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Justin93
Well did the compression check. All cylinders at between 195 and 200. I did find two plugs with the porcelain cracked as well as one not threaded in all the way. Guess I should have supervised better when my buddies were helping me finish it up.

Any way I'm probably going to pop the heads off when I'm home again and switch to a .030 compressed thickness gasket to get the quench back down. I've been looking at cometic's site as well as Google trying to find a LS 4.085 bore head gasket with .030 compressed thickness but have had no luck. Would the 4.060 bore gaskets work ok on an l92 head?
Yes they will work just fine. Your actually cylinders are less than 4.060 bore
Old 09-07-2016, 04:07 PM
  #17  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Justin93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Canfield,Oh
Posts: 269
Received 18 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mavn
Yes they will work just fine. Your actually cylinders are less than 4.060 bore
i always thought you were supposed to base your gasket bore off the head chamber bore
Old 09-07-2016, 05:36 PM
  #18  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,848
Received 307 Likes on 207 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Justin93
i always thought you were supposed to base your gasket bore off the head chamber bore
Well it needs to be bigger than your cylinder bore or your pistons could hit.
Old 09-08-2016, 02:38 PM
  #19  
TECH Fanatic
 
MuhThugga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wilmington, De
Posts: 1,671
Received 228 Likes on 153 Posts

Default

Piston bore or head chamber bore; whichever is bigger.
Old 09-08-2016, 02:41 PM
  #20  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Justin93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Canfield,Oh
Posts: 269
Received 18 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Definitely the head chamber in my case.


Quick Reply: Ls2 403 with L92 heads looking for improvement



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:50 PM.