Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Which ARP rob bolt kit? 08 LH6 5.3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-24-2017, 08:38 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Grip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Santa Rosa, Ca
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Which ARP rob bolt kit? 08 LH6 5.3

I see two kit numbers. Both are described as cracked cap rod design.

134-6006 or 234-6301?

Last edited by Grip; 05-24-2017 at 08:39 PM. Reason: Rod, not rob
Old 05-25-2017, 03:01 AM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
07NBSChevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

The Pro Series (234-6301) is a stronger alloy, that is the main difference. In my opinion I would go with those. Just remember to have the rods resized with a line bore to prevent uneven clamping force which can lead to a spun bearing or worse.
Old 05-25-2017, 09:59 AM
  #3  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,848
Received 307 Likes on 207 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Grip
I see two kit numbers. Both are described as cracked cap rod design.

134-6006 or 234-6301?
As mentioned, the 234 kit is the ARP 2000 alloy which is stronger than the 8740 alloy used in the 134 kit. The ARP 2000 alloy has a higher recommended torque value so there's a better chance that the big end bore will distort more.

I've used the ARP 2000 kit in a set with of LS3 rods and it did distort the bore, but it wasn't out of spec. I just used a "race" style bearing and set the clearances accordingly. It ran fine like that, but I'll have the engine out and apart soon due to a broken valve spring, so I can see what it looks like.
Old 05-25-2017, 10:23 AM
  #4  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Grip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Santa Rosa, Ca
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 07NBSChevy
The Pro Series (234-6301) is a stronger alloy, that is the main difference. In my opinion I would go with those. Just remember to have the rods resized with a line bore to prevent uneven clamping force which can lead to a spun bearing or worse.
thank you!
Old 05-25-2017, 04:11 PM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
07NBSChevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KCS
As mentioned, the 234 kit is the ARP 2000 alloy which is stronger than the 8740 alloy used in the 134 kit. The ARP 2000 alloy has a higher recommended torque value so there's a better chance that the big end bore will distort more.

I've used the ARP 2000 kit in a set with of LS3 rods and it did distort the bore, but it wasn't out of spec. I just used a "race" style bearing and set the clearances accordingly. It ran fine like that, but I'll have the engine out and apart soon due to a broken valve spring, so I can see what it looks like.
Keep us updated, I am interested in how everything turned out after teardown.
Old 06-05-2017, 10:53 AM
  #6  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,848
Received 307 Likes on 207 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 07NBSChevy
Keep us updated, I am interested in how everything turned out after teardown.
They don't look as great as I had hoped. Almost all of the upper rod bearings had some wear to them, but it wasn't much. Usually that would indicate detonation or too much timing advance.

These were coated ACL Race bearings:
Name:  753D2ADA-BAB8-43F5-ABCE-C6E4BEA0F611_zpsgh4zjozn.jpg
Views: 215
Size:  133.5 KB

No sign of detonation on the pistons:
Name:  6D3B3EAC-29D6-462C-9C8C-46083EC7ED78_zpsjb1ndqbw.jpg
Views: 206
Size:  125.3 KB
Old 06-06-2017, 12:44 AM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
07NBSChevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

You don't think any of that wear on the bearings is from using ARP bolts without truing the bore?
Old 06-06-2017, 07:02 AM
  #8  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,848
Received 307 Likes on 207 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 07NBSChevy
You don't think any of that wear on the bearings is from using ARP bolts without truing the bore?
I don't see how it could be. The wear is at 12 o'clock which is where I measured for clearance. The ID of the bearing is supposed to be elliptical with the tightest clearance at 12 and 6 o'clock and larger clearance as you measure nearer to the parting lines.

Even with the bore slightly out of round, 12 and 6 o'clock was still the tightest clearance like it's supposed to be.
Old 06-06-2017, 07:40 AM
  #9  
Restricted User
 
JoeNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,194
Received 104 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

I noticed that nobody here tried to save him any money by telling him that ARP rod bolts in gen 4 rods is pointless.
Old 06-06-2017, 06:09 PM
  #10  
TECH Resident
 
cookseyb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 926
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

I just had my machine shop install ARP bolts and check the rod ends, one was so distorted I had to get a new rod. I had always thought this was BS but I guess is really is a issue.I also had my mains checked and it only took a touch-up hone job but the crank is in and torqued and it spins easily by hand and the thrust checks out...



Quick Reply: Which ARP rob bolt kit? 08 LH6 5.3



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:03 PM.