Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

4.165 bore stroker

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-18-2017, 02:19 PM
  #21  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (1)
 
pantera_efi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Santa Ana, CA. USA
Posts: 2,157
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default Crank Pin Hole & Oil Hole

Hi All, my cranks do NOT like an "offset" grind.

The forging was designed (same forging as Callies, Scat) with BALANCE Holes in the "pin" area.
Then you need to RESPECT the Oil Hole as it could "move" depending on what side the metal was removed.

I use Marine Crankshaft for the ALM crankshaft AND David is within ONE mile of my shop.

Lance
Old 08-18-2017, 03:49 PM
  #22  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
64post's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Sonoma Co. Ca.
Posts: 1,686
Received 226 Likes on 179 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tech@WS6store
Also the "honda" 6.125 rods that are sometimes used, though not as often as you seem to think, are a 1.88" They arent avail in an 1.85".
You are obviously thinking about merely turning a journal down not offset grinding.
Im sure we know that you dont like kcs from previous posts, but when you try to "throw shade" at him and even his crank grinder without knowing what offset grinding means, it really doesnt help.
Sending me a nasty pm on top for pointing it out shows even less class.

The other part....still not doable esp on a stock crank or non sj crank. The oil holes move ALOT And it does indeed weaken the crank. Depending on the pin geometry it could take quite a bit more off the inside and very little off the outside. It depends on what offset you are looking for. Without extra welding its a recipe for disaster and after all that extra work and cost where are you?

4.8 stroke cranks have std large pins and are commonly used as "short stroke cranks" and are hardly ever turned into a small journal even let alone a Honda journal. 3.622 cranks same way.
I said nothing about a Honda rod journal, I mentioned1.850" which is the most common sized NASCAR journal, Lentz, Carrillo and Pankl all offer 1.850".

Last edited by KCS; 08-18-2017 at 03:59 PM. Reason: Removed Insults
Old 08-18-2017, 03:55 PM
  #23  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
64post's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Sonoma Co. Ca.
Posts: 1,686
Received 226 Likes on 179 Posts

Default

Was only using 1.850 as an example of small journal, not a size that a journal should be reduced to. In an effort to gain stroke.

Last edited by KCS; 08-18-2017 at 03:59 PM. Reason: Removed Insults
Old 08-18-2017, 04:06 PM
  #24  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
tech@WS6store's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,659
Received 238 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 64post
Was only using 1.850 as an example of small journal, not a size that a journal should be reduced to. In an effort to gain stroke. You come into most threads trying to pedal your wares and it comes off as both desperate and sleepy.
KCS is right. You DO know everything. Except the difference between turning a journal down and offset grinding and that honda rods are whats normally used for very small journal "high rpm" builds.
Do not pretend to know whatmwe do and do not sell either or work with. You making an assumption....well im sure you know the rest.
BROOKS KEITH BLACK TRICK TITANIUM SONNY BRYANT...i can name drop also. You wanna buy any of those ill sell em to ya also along with the rest of our wares.
Old 08-18-2017, 08:48 PM
  #25  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
64post's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Sonoma Co. Ca.
Posts: 1,686
Received 226 Likes on 179 Posts

Default

I don't know whamwe, you 're right about that.
Old 08-18-2017, 08:50 PM
  #26  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
64post's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Sonoma Co. Ca.
Posts: 1,686
Received 226 Likes on 179 Posts

Default

1.850" is the new 1.88" , not a name drop just letting know.
Old 08-18-2017, 08:51 PM
  #27  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
64post's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Sonoma Co. Ca.
Posts: 1,686
Received 226 Likes on 179 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 64post
I don't know whamwe, you 're right about that.
Never heard that word before.
Old 08-18-2017, 08:59 PM
  #28  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 20,875
Received 3,021 Likes on 2,352 Posts
Default

It's "whatmwe"; "What we" with an "m" put in the middle when you miss the space bar and hit "m" instead. "Do not pretend to know what we do and do not sell....."
Plus it took you almost 5 hours to come up with such a nugget of wisdom. Nobody thinks what you say is cute OR funny. So quit being such an ***.
Old 08-18-2017, 11:37 PM
  #29  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
tech@WS6store's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,659
Received 238 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

Im sure its not. Esp for use on a stock crank. You are talking about race builds that are beyond what 99% of this whole forum does. As far as using rods for LS its sbc, sj sbc, honda. You dont know that it appears, so why are you on an LS forum arguing any of this? Throwing insults at everyone. It clearly doesnt help your cause.

I do make grammatical errors mostly because i use my phone. Big. Deal.
Old 08-18-2017, 11:54 PM
  #30  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 20,875
Received 3,021 Likes on 2,352 Posts
Default

Just another bozo with an agenda....
Old 08-20-2017, 11:15 AM
  #31  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Last 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 232
Received 84 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

so if i use a 3.625 crank and 6.350 rod with a 1.050 piston. i will be about -.030 in the hole?









who make a thin head gasket ?
Old 08-20-2017, 12:12 PM
  #32  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
tech@WS6store's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,659
Received 238 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

Stocl cranks are 3.622. 3.625 are usually aftermarket forged. You can assume that but usually even aftermarket setups will stick out of the hole. That is why i said assemble and measure first, then cut the deck. At zero deck youd want .040 min for head gasket to account for thermal expansion and any stretch at the higher rpms.
We have cometic in a 4.185 bore that will fit reg 4 bolt ls or 6 bolt lsx block ans what you are looking for. we have em in .035 .040 and .045 and above of course.
Old 08-20-2017, 12:29 PM
  #33  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (1)
 
pantera_efi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Santa Ana, CA. USA
Posts: 2,157
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default Deck Height = 9.2125 for "0"

Hi Last1, your math 1.8125 + 6.350 + 1.050 = 9.2125 for a "0" deck.

My method would be to "deck" your block AND use a 19170419.

I have had problems with those "thin" gaskets. ( NOT LS BUT Cometic .018" with a Subaru 4.00" bore EJ-27)

This problem is caused by the "lack" of metal distance (.01???) and the use of Studs that do not stretch at the AL head's expansion rate.

I have had problems with Honda Bearings, ALM engines, as there are TWO sizes. (1.88" AND 1.89")

JUST a bit of FIY for ordering tech.

Lance
Old 08-20-2017, 02:15 PM
  #34  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Last 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 232
Received 84 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pantera EFI
Hi Last1, your math 1.8125 + 6.350 + 1.050 = 9.2125 for a "0" deck.

My method would be to "deck" your block AND use a 19170419.

I have had problems with those "thin" gaskets. ( NOT LS BUT Cometic .018" with a Subaru 4.00" bore EJ-27)

This problem is caused by the "lack" of metal distance (.01???) and the use of Studs that do not stretch at the AL head's expansion rate.

I have had problems with Honda Bearings, ALM engines, as there are TWO sizes. (1.88" AND 1.89")

JUST a bit of FIY for ordering tech.

Lance
how did u come up with the # 1.8125 in formula u used ?
Old 08-20-2017, 02:16 PM
  #35  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Last 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 232
Received 84 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tech@WS6store
Stocl cranks are 3.622. 3.625 are usually aftermarket forged. You can assume that but usually even aftermarket setups will stick out of the hole. That is why i said assemble and measure first, then cut the deck. At zero deck youd want .040 min for head gasket to account for thermal expansion and any stretch at the higher rpms.
We have cometic in a 4.185 bore that will fit reg 4 bolt ls or 6 bolt lsx block ans what you are looking for. we have em in .035 .040 and .045 and above of course.
thanx for your help
Old 08-20-2017, 02:17 PM
  #36  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
tech@WS6store's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,659
Received 238 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

3.622/2 is 1.811 3.625 /2 is 1.8125
Stroke /2 to add to ch and rod length find assembled height vs deck height.
Old 08-20-2017, 02:31 PM
  #37  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Last 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 232
Received 84 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tech@WS6store
3.622/2 is 1.811 3.625 /2 is 1.8125
Stroke /2 to add to ch and rod length find assembled height vs deck height.
thanx
Old 08-21-2017, 06:15 PM
  #38  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Last 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 232
Received 84 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

talk to wiseco today/ having my piston mill to removed about -.0130 ch will be 1.0370 so with a 6.390 rod and a 3.625 crank=9.240 is the math right/ ps anybody make 6.390 rod with a 2.00 small journal for a ls motor thanx for your help
Old 08-21-2017, 06:32 PM
  #39  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
tech@WS6store's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,659
Received 238 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

You are going about this the wrong way really. And adding in a small journal? Good luck. Its actually 6.3905 but 6.390 is likely close enough.
A few companies make a bbc 6.385 rod in a 2.100 crank pin but its a .990 pin. Even then youd have to cut the block. Next up is a 1.88 big end 6.378 with a .889 small end. still wont work.
Youd need a complete custom rod.
Old 08-21-2017, 07:02 PM
  #40  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Last 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 232
Received 84 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tech@WS6store
You are going about this the wrong way really. And adding in a small journal? Good luck. Its actually 6.3905 but 6.390 is likely close enough.
A few companies make a bbc 6.385 rod in a 2.100 crank pin but its a .990 pin. Even then youd have to cut the block. Next up is a 1.88 big end 6.378 with a .889 small end. still wont work.
Youd need a complete custom rod.
what wrong going with 6.390 rod my piston are -11cc inverted domes

Last edited by Last 1; 08-21-2017 at 07:04 PM. Reason: changed


Quick Reply: 4.165 bore stroker



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:00 PM.