Dyno Results: MMS LS7 heads ERL 427 build has begun
#81
It's a bit unusual you spent all that money with your original build and produced a low torque figure. Usually these heads produce a ton of torque.
If you are aiming for a NA engine why use dish pistons?
You are better off with flat tops.
Cam choice was also very mild for such a size engine and so was compression.
You are leaving power on the table for no good reason.
I must admit though, that flat torque curve is amazing with hardly any drop off even near the red line.
This is one benefit of wide split cams too. They do wonders for power and torque after peak.
Cam Specs are ok but you need more IVC timing and overlap.
IVC needs to be at 52 and maybe open the exhaust a little earlier at 65 or 66
So something like a 242/256 114 LSA +3 would give you more of what you want, will also rev higher and still drive decent.
If you are aiming for a NA engine why use dish pistons?
You are better off with flat tops.
Cam choice was also very mild for such a size engine and so was compression.
You are leaving power on the table for no good reason.
I must admit though, that flat torque curve is amazing with hardly any drop off even near the red line.
This is one benefit of wide split cams too. They do wonders for power and torque after peak.
Cam Specs are ok but you need more IVC timing and overlap.
IVC needs to be at 52 and maybe open the exhaust a little earlier at 65 or 66
So something like a 242/256 114 LSA +3 would give you more of what you want, will also rev higher and still drive decent.
#85
TECH Enthusiast
I run a 454 with 72 cc head and have the -3 dome/dish and it is like 11.8 to 1 compression (.051 gasket). So his engine is 3% bigger he would be just about 12.1 compression (assuming 72 cc head) so I could see with a 61 cc head he would need a good size dish.
Last edited by Double06; 04-04-2019 at 07:19 AM. Reason: adding stuff
#93
ModSquad
iTrader: (6)
#99
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,835 Likes
on
1,145 Posts
Still conservative IMO, and a very wide split. On that 468 motor, i'd be thinking 252/266
Last edited by Darth_V8r; 07-23-2019 at 05:10 PM.
The following users liked this post:
AINT SKEERED (07-23-2019)
#100
ModSquad
iTrader: (6)
Agreed. I’m running a solid 254/268 .720ish” lift in a 434” and honestly it’s very drivable. Will be even more drivable once I find time to get Darth to do some street tuning for me. But really drives well, no kidding.