Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Which quench would you choose .035 or .041? Also, is quench set cold or warm?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-03-2019, 10:54 AM
  #1  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (77)
 
98RedBird's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 2,772
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default Which quench would you choose .035 or .041? Also, is quench set cold or warm?

Pistons are sticking out of the hole .009" +- .001" on the new motor. It'll be N/A with maybe a small shot of nitrous later on.

Head chambers are 4.125 so that leaves me with Cometic for a gasket.

They offer 2 that'll work. either a .051" or a .045"

Which would you choose? .035 seems like it's getting on the tight side, and .041 puts me right in the middle of "ideal"

Also, are you shooting for a warm quench or a cold quench number? Logic would say that .035 would be good on an aluminum motor, let it warm up, and grow into the .041" range, rather than starting at .041 and growing out to .046"

Thanks
Old 05-03-2019, 11:35 AM
  #2  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
NEstyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 264
Received 21 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

I would do 0.035". It's calculated when cold.
Old 05-03-2019, 05:39 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
spanks13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,237
Received 469 Likes on 302 Posts

Default

.035 is too tight, go for .041.

The larger the bore the more piston rock you get. If you rev the thing you don’t want the pistons hitting the head.
Old 05-03-2019, 06:27 PM
  #4  
TECH Junkie
 
98CayenneT/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: White Bear, Mn
Posts: 3,885
Received 345 Likes on 237 Posts

Default

I run .033"
Old 05-03-2019, 06:37 PM
  #5  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
NEstyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 264
Received 21 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Lots of people run 0.035".
Old 05-03-2019, 07:59 PM
  #6  
TECH Apprentice
 
Bazman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 332
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I run about 31. 35 too tight my ***. LS love it tight. To be fair, I don't mind it tight myself
Old 05-03-2019, 08:20 PM
  #7  
ModSquad
iTrader: (6)
 
Che70velle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dawsonville Ga.
Posts: 6,311
Received 3,360 Likes on 2,078 Posts

Default

.035” here with a 4.155” bore.
Old 05-03-2019, 08:28 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
spanks13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,237
Received 469 Likes on 302 Posts

Default

Enjoy it guys lol. This isn’t something I’d slap together based on advice on the Internet. Check piston rock at TDC and make your own judgement call.

You don’t want the piston touching the head.
Old 05-03-2019, 08:40 PM
  #9  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
NEstyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 264
Received 21 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spanks13
Enjoy it guys lol. This isn’t something I’d slap together based on advice on the Internet. Check piston rock at TDC and make your own judgement call.

You don’t want the piston touching the head.
He asked for advice on the internet and he got real world advice on the internet from guys that have experience. Isn't that the whole point?
Old 05-03-2019, 08:51 PM
  #10  
ModSquad
iTrader: (6)
 
Che70velle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dawsonville Ga.
Posts: 6,311
Received 3,360 Likes on 2,078 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by spanks13
Enjoy it guys lol. This isn’t something I’d slap together based on advice on the Internet. Check piston rock at TDC and make your own judgement call.

You don’t want the piston touching the head.
Piston rock will decrease as the engine heats up. Piston to wall clearance will tighten. I’ve seen .029” set up cold, iron block, and it went 500+ laps at Bristol. Tony Mamo tried .028” and it bit him, but only because he had one connecting rod a smidge longer than the other 7, and he missed it. .035” is fine with LS engines. Make sure out of hole is measured square with a dual gauge deck bridge for best results.
Old 05-03-2019, 11:28 PM
  #11  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
KW Baraka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: S.A., TX
Posts: 2,180
Received 130 Likes on 99 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 98RedBird
Which quench would you choose .035 or .041?
Originally Posted by NEstyle
I would do 0.035". It's calculated when cold.
Originally Posted by 98CayenneT/A
I run .033"
I run .035" and I regularly spin to 7K RPMs.

Go with .035".....and give that baby some compression while you're at it!

KW
Old 05-03-2019, 11:41 PM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 20,868
Received 3,019 Likes on 2,350 Posts
Default

How much are LS pistons USUALLY out of the hole, IF there is a common spec? Or are they all over the map? I had heard about .005-.006, and used with the .052 (I think) GM gasket gives about .046 quench. Am I figuring this right? I'm kinda new to figuring combustion clearances, so forgive my ignorance.
Old 05-04-2019, 08:11 AM
  #13  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,848
Received 307 Likes on 207 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by G Atsma
How much are LS pistons USUALLY out of the hole, IF there is a common spec? Or are they all over the map? I had heard about .005-.006, and used with the .052 (I think) GM gasket gives about .046 quench. Am I figuring this right? I'm kinda new to figuring combustion clearances, so forgive my ignorance.
The stock iron block engines I've checked were all about .006", but when you use aftermarket pistons and rods, and have your block machined, it could be way different.

Back in the 80's, MIT tested the effects of quench and found that it has less and less benefit as the compression ratio is increased. If you measure each hole correctly, you can get a way with .035" quench. If you're just guessing based off calculations, I would go with .041" to be safe.
Old 05-04-2019, 08:52 AM
  #14  
Launching!
 
Polyalphaolefin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 267
Received 170 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

I've run as tight as .024" at 6500 rpm without contact, but the part number etched into the piston top was readable in the carbon print on the head so it was coming extremely close. I would say .035" is more than enough clearance.

The bottom end also plays a factor in this. The heavier the pistons, the higher the inertia. The longer the stroke, the higher the inertia. Also lower the rod/stroke ratio, the higher the upward inertia.
Old 05-04-2019, 10:39 AM
  #15  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 20,868
Received 3,019 Likes on 2,350 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KCS
The stock iron block engines I've checked were all about .006", but when you use aftermarket pistons and rods, and have your block machined, it could be way different.

Back in the 80's, MIT tested the effects of quench and found that it has less and less benefit as the compression ratio is increased. If you measure each hole correctly, you can get a way with .035" quench. If you're just guessing based off calculations, I would go with .041" to be safe.
So iron blocks usually about .006. Aluminum? I do realize aluminum expands more as heated, so out-of-hole should decrease more than iron.
Old 05-04-2019, 10:54 AM
  #16  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
AINT SKEERED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Albany La
Posts: 3,985
Received 350 Likes on 239 Posts

Default

I'm at .037 on my 427 turning 7900 rpm
Old 05-04-2019, 08:21 PM
  #17  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
tech@WS6store's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,658
Received 237 Likes on 183 Posts
Default

If it runs on the street and you dont get consistent fuel use the .041 (.051 gasket) I highly doubt youll see any difference worth the tighter quench vs fuel quality issues.
Old 05-04-2019, 08:39 PM
  #18  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,848
Received 307 Likes on 207 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by G Atsma
So iron blocks usually about .006. Aluminum? I do realize aluminum expands more as heated, so out-of-hole should decrease more than iron.
I'm not sure on aluminum, I can't remember ever measuring a stock aluminum shortblock.
Old 05-04-2019, 09:10 PM
  #19  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
tech@WS6store's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,658
Received 237 Likes on 183 Posts
Default

Pistons grow also so keep that in mind too.
AND not all blocks have the same deck height side to side as well.
If you want to get that precise youre jumping down a rabbit hole sometimes.
Old 05-04-2019, 11:22 PM
  #20  
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Darth_V8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,835 Likes on 1,145 Posts
Default

I had always read 035. When I was doing all the **** on the 346, I found the motor ran much better at 042 than 035. On the 428, I set it up for 041, assuming higher rpm would increase rod stretch.

My pistons were dead even on deck height on the 428, 006 out of the hole on the sbe 346. I measure deck height at the centerline of the piston where it moves the least when rocking.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:56 PM.