6 speed manual t56 how much RPM drop?
#1
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
6 speed manual t56 how much RPM drop?
Hi just wondering how much rpm drop there is between gears when up shifting, for example gears first to second and third with stock 3:46:1 diff?
#3
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,452
Received 1,852 Likes
on
1,152 Posts
Rear gear does not affect rpm drop. Just the mph at which you shift. If you shift at 7200, you will drop to about 4800
#4
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Thanks I used that calculator and filled all the boxes, I was guessing drop would be 1500 rpm, but it's likely to be 2000 rpm or more.
Reason I ask was I was thinking of the mild 108 LSA cam with dyno results posted this forum recently that reached peak torque at 3600 rpm and what that could mean for gear change rpm.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iii-internal-engine/1934025-callies-new-552-lift-camshaft-series-dyno-tested-2003-5-3-silverado.html
Reason I ask was I was thinking of the mild 108 LSA cam with dyno results posted this forum recently that reached peak torque at 3600 rpm and what that could mean for gear change rpm.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iii-internal-engine/1934025-callies-new-552-lift-camshaft-series-dyno-tested-2003-5-3-silverado.html
Last edited by TimsLS1; 04-10-2020 at 09:16 PM.
#5
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
www.pszweb.com/car/gears.htm http://www.pszweb.com/car/gears.htm
There's a better calc for ya to use.
There's a better calc for ya to use.
#8
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (23)
Trans output shaft speed (driveline speed) is the same before and after the shift.
Driveline speed = (RPM before shift) / (Trans gear ratio before shift)
Driveline speed = (RPM after shift) / (Trans gear ratio after shift)
Therefore,
(RPM after shift) / (Trans gear ratio after shift) = (RPM before shift) / (Trans gear ratio before shift)
Solving for "RPM after shift",
RPM after shift = (RPM before shift) * (Trans gear ratio after shift) / (Trans gear ratio before shift)
T56 trans
1st gear ratio: 2.66
2nd gear ratio: 1.78
3rd gear ratio: 1.30
4th gear ratio: 1.00
Example: 2 --> 3 gear shift
2nd gear ratio: 1.78
3rd gear ratio: 1.30
Shift point: 6000 rpm
If you shift at 6000 rpm, then you'll end up at about 4380 rpm after the shift
RPM after shift = (6000 rpm) * 1.30 / 1.78 = 4382 rpm
Driveline speed = (RPM before shift) / (Trans gear ratio before shift)
Driveline speed = (RPM after shift) / (Trans gear ratio after shift)
Therefore,
(RPM after shift) / (Trans gear ratio after shift) = (RPM before shift) / (Trans gear ratio before shift)
Solving for "RPM after shift",
RPM after shift = (RPM before shift) * (Trans gear ratio after shift) / (Trans gear ratio before shift)
T56 trans
1st gear ratio: 2.66
2nd gear ratio: 1.78
3rd gear ratio: 1.30
4th gear ratio: 1.00
Example: 2 --> 3 gear shift
2nd gear ratio: 1.78
3rd gear ratio: 1.30
Shift point: 6000 rpm
If you shift at 6000 rpm, then you'll end up at about 4380 rpm after the shift
RPM after shift = (6000 rpm) * 1.30 / 1.78 = 4382 rpm
#10
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Thanks for all the replies:
Wiki has all the ratios here
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borg...6_transmission
My 99 Commodore is Same as Camaro.
If the driver takes too long to change gear it would be a bigger drop as car would slow down. 😉
Wiki has all the ratios here
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borg...6_transmission
My 99 Commodore is Same as Camaro.
If the driver takes too long to change gear it would be a bigger drop as car would slow down. 😉
#12
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (23)
You asked what was rpm drop per gear. But focusing on just the the engine rpm splits isn't the big picture. The only thing that accelerates your car is torque that the tires sticks to the ground. Rear gear does matter because it changes how much torque the tire puts to the ground.
I'm just thinking out loud, but I suppose if you want to be quick as possible then you've got to try to maximize area under the torque curve (tire torque to ground) inside the mph range of interest. Every time you shift there will be a huge loss of torque to ground, so that's one reason why racers hold gears to as high rpm as possible. If you have a dyno chart of your engine, then you could construct a graph of torque vs. mph (it will stair step because of gear shifts) and tweak variables to see what changes push you in the right direction.
I don't know, I'm just brainstorming with you.
I'm just thinking out loud, but I suppose if you want to be quick as possible then you've got to try to maximize area under the torque curve (tire torque to ground) inside the mph range of interest. Every time you shift there will be a huge loss of torque to ground, so that's one reason why racers hold gears to as high rpm as possible. If you have a dyno chart of your engine, then you could construct a graph of torque vs. mph (it will stair step because of gear shifts) and tweak variables to see what changes push you in the right direction.
I don't know, I'm just brainstorming with you.
#13
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
I don't like reving more than is necessary for best times and see it as a bit of a compromise, for example if reving to 6000 instead of 7000 before a gear change nets a similar result then reving to seven is considerably harder on engine (engine revs and wear is not linear)
This is just a theoretical example, but in practice I have seen a number of examples where the difference between a baby cam and one with 10 degrees more duration amounts to about 0.2 or 0.3 seconds in the quarter.
This is just a theoretical example, but in practice I have seen a number of examples where the difference between a baby cam and one with 10 degrees more duration amounts to about 0.2 or 0.3 seconds in the quarter.
Last edited by TimsLS1; 04-10-2020 at 09:22 PM.
#14
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (23)
Yes, it's more easy to regret going too big with a cam due to possible drivability issues. That's totally subjective so it's your choice to make and your choice alone.
And you're right, engines wear out faster when they're run harder. You've basically got xxx amount of fuel burn until the short block is done, and you get to decide how that happens. And you can wear out the top end (valvtrain) even quicker depending what you do.
And you're right, engines wear out faster when they're run harder. You've basically got xxx amount of fuel burn until the short block is done, and you get to decide how that happens. And you can wear out the top end (valvtrain) even quicker depending what you do.
#15
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
I've tried to find info on the relationship between engine wear and rpm many times all I could find was some obscure info from the Air Force running piston engines, not that it matters if you have the money for it all , still it is of interest.
#16
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (23)
If you've ever been around large diesel engines then you'll learn that engine wear-out has a pretty darn good correlation to total fuel burn. You can burn the fuel at 1500 Hp for so many hours, or you can burn the fuel at 2000 Hp for fewer hours. This is for engines that run within guidelines. I doubt it holds true for racing since most the problems are related to just plain old **** breaking.
So applying this to your situation, the engine will last a lot longer (hours) sipping fuel while cruising the highway at 2000 rpm than it will guzzling fuel while ripping around Road America at 5000 rpm. Obviously there are other factors but it works pretty good at a high level view.
But that still doesn't answer your question of what's the total fuel burn of an LS engine? Those numbers are probably guarded in the halls of GM and I don't know. You *might* be able to get a feel for it if you find recommended maintenance intervals for police service vehicles and how many hours they recommend engine overhaul. But again, you're still not done backwards engineering it with just that info.
So applying this to your situation, the engine will last a lot longer (hours) sipping fuel while cruising the highway at 2000 rpm than it will guzzling fuel while ripping around Road America at 5000 rpm. Obviously there are other factors but it works pretty good at a high level view.
But that still doesn't answer your question of what's the total fuel burn of an LS engine? Those numbers are probably guarded in the halls of GM and I don't know. You *might* be able to get a feel for it if you find recommended maintenance intervals for police service vehicles and how many hours they recommend engine overhaul. But again, you're still not done backwards engineering it with just that info.
Last edited by QwkTrip; 04-11-2020 at 01:06 AM.
#17
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Yes some of those marine engines can nearly double engine life with just a small reduction of WOT at max power (about 15% down from max from memory???)
Rod to stroke ratio also effects engine life as there is more side loading at high rpm with long stroke short rods.
These were said to be from a 383 stroker with only 500 miles on them.
Rod to stroke ratio also effects engine life as there is more side loading at high rpm with long stroke short rods.
These were said to be from a 383 stroker with only 500 miles on them.
Last edited by TimsLS1; 04-11-2020 at 03:06 AM.