Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

power difference between 402ci & 427ci w/same heads and cam?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-19-2006, 10:41 AM
  #21  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
mike c.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: mi
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

what would be a good seat of heads for a 427ci? i thought AFR 225's would be enough.
Old 08-19-2006, 06:38 PM
  #22  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
black_knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mike c.
what would be a good seat of heads for a 427ci? i thought AFR 225's would be enough.
ETP has heads that go up to 265, I think. Stock LS7 heads are also great. Both of those will run the LS7 intake, which is said to outflow the FAST 90 by a bit.
Old 08-19-2006, 07:25 PM
  #23  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
383ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kansas City, KS
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by black_knight
ETP has heads that go up to 265, I think. Stock LS7 heads are also great. Both of those will run the LS7 intake, which is said to outflow the FAST 90 by a bit.
an LS7 intake outflows a Fast 90 by a huge amount. also, only ETP ls7 heads will fit an ls7 intake, not the rest of the ETP line. just clarifying.
Old 08-19-2006, 09:17 PM
  #24  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
black_knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 383ss
an LS7 intake outflows a Fast 90 by a huge amount. also, only ETP ls7 heads will fit an ls7 intake, not the rest of the ETP line. just clarifying.
Yes, that's right. Thanks for mentioning it.
Old 08-19-2006, 09:24 PM
  #25  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Beast96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

If you go 427, get the LS7 stuff. You'll deffiantlly maximize the potential.
Old 08-19-2006, 09:34 PM
  #26  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
mike c.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: mi
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

here are a few things that i don't get. right now i have a 346ci w/g5x4 cam,AFR 205 heads,fast 90 w/ N/K-th-body,85mm mass,1 3/4 headers m6 car 12bolt 4.11's. i made 463hp 413.9tq mustang dyno,no short belt tricks no ele waterpump. . BLACK KNIGHT & 383SS-help me out here please. if the ls7 heads are good flowing heads(as stated by black night) and the ls7 intake out flows the fast intake by a huge amount(stated by 383ss)and the ls7 is 427ci why am i making more power and tq on a ls1 346ci through a 12 bolt when the ls7 is supposed to out flow/perform what i have? i have seen the ls7 making between 430hp and 455rwhp & around 400tq. i want to get around 600hp on motor for the money i'll have to spend on this ls7. what do i have to do to do that? sorry for the trouble guys.
thanks, mike c.
Old 08-20-2006, 12:53 AM
  #27  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
black_knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Mike,

The LS7 suffers from a lack of cam, a lack of exhaust (both the heads and the headers), and a lack of tune. LS7's with longtube headers, big cams, and good tunes are already pushing past 600RWHP. Look around in the dyno section and here and see the people that are making the #'s you're looking for. It can be done.
Old 08-20-2006, 01:10 AM
  #28  
TECH Regular
 
rjkZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Lombard,IL
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

hey guys im looking into a 427ci setup my self, and i was really considering doing ETP ls7 heads and ls7 intake, not sure one cam size yet. i also i want to spray like 175-200 shot on top as well. my goal is the car to go somewhere in the 10s on motor on hopefully in the 9s with a shot. i know its gonna take alot of money but i think it would be one hell of a setup.
Old 08-20-2006, 01:12 AM
  #29  
On The Tree
 
disco192's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Houston/ Austin, TX
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Im sorry, but you will see little gain in HP by simply adding cubes. Adding bore will allow for more airflow, but you are typically limited by intake port mach number.

If you increase the displacement by ~5% then your peak HP will decrease by ~5% and your TQ will increase ~5%.

Adding cubes and not compensating with more port, then you wont see any added power.

Ive been saying this for a long time. Power (and RPM) potential is all in the heads.

A stroker just allows for more TQ and a flatter curve. With larger heads, you can increase power along with TQ (and curve).

Its not that complicated really.
Old 08-20-2006, 07:43 AM
  #30  
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,245
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

Going from a 402 to a 427 gains 25 cubic inches. Since the stroke is the same, you will get less valve shrouding with the larger 427 bore. Most good street strip motors make 1.35 times their displacement in hp and 1.25 times their displacement in torque when optimized.

That means:
543/502 rwhp/tq for the 402
576/534 rwhp/tq for the 427

The problem here lies with the fact that you'll be taking heads and cam optimized for a 402 and adding them to the larger 427. The 427 won't be optimized. Therefore, it won't achieve the 1.35/1.25 ratio. Basically, you will get less of a gain for the 427...more like 25/25 rwhp/rwtq gain.
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2022 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 S&B CAI, Corsa catback.
2023 Corvette 3LT Z51 soon to be modified.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.

Old 08-20-2006, 09:29 AM
  #31  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
mike c.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: mi
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

i see how it works.gotta do it right the first time. i'll start looking into a e.t ls7 head and intake for a 427ci set up. you guys have provided lots of great help and info here,thanks. mike c.

Last edited by mike c.; 08-20-2006 at 09:36 AM.
Old 08-20-2006, 11:24 AM
  #32  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
slow trap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: tennessee
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

well crap,this has got me second guessing my 427 plans also.isn't the fast 90/90 a pretty big restriction past the 525-550 rw range more so than say a set of afr 225 or any of the heads that flow 320+ and capable of fwhp in the 650 range ? 25/25 at the wheels is still a decent gain.wouldn't the 427 have quite a bit more power under the curve?i'm not asking for much,i was just wanting 550 rwhp,525 tq with something like the giant cam or the 244/248,427 ci with 12:2 cr with a dcr around 8.5 or so.
Old 08-20-2006, 12:25 PM
  #33  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
383ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kansas City, KS
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by slow trap
well crap,this has got me second guessing my 427 plans also.isn't the fast 90/90 a pretty big restriction past the 525-550 rw range more so than say a set of afr 225 or any of the heads that flow 320+ and capable of fwhp in the 650 range ? 25/25 at the wheels is still a decent gain.wouldn't the 427 have quite a bit more power under the curve?i'm not asking for much,i was just wanting 550 rwhp,525 tq with something like the giant cam or the 244/248,427 ci with 12:2 cr with a dcr around 8.5 or so.
a well built 408 will get you close to those numbers with a ported fast 90/90
Old 08-20-2006, 05:55 PM
  #34  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
black_knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Patrick G
The problem here lies with the fact that you'll be taking heads and cam optimized for a 402 and adding them to the larger 427. The 427 won't be optimized. Therefore, it won't achieve the 1.35/1.25 ratio. Basically, you will get less of a gain for the 427...more like 25/25 rwhp/rwtq gain.
Well said!
Old 08-21-2006, 12:07 AM
  #35  
TECH Regular
 
rjkZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Lombard,IL
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i herd the ls7 intake out flows the fast instake, now do you think fast is gonna come out with a new intake or would it just be better at that point to have a sheet metal? im really looking into puttin the ls7 top end on a 427ci build, i want to make it 12.1 -12.5 compression ratio, whats the most hp i can make with that setup?
Old 08-22-2006, 04:18 PM
  #36  
Teching In
 
81LsElky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

going with etp ls7 heads and an ls7 intake on top of a 427 with a 244/248 cam, you will see 600rwhp+ guaranteed with a good tuner! btw yes the ls7 intake does outflow the fast 90 intake by a lot and can be picked up for about a 1/3 of the cost. if fast industries did come out with another intake that would outflow the ls7 intake, it would run big$$$ then the gains most likely would be nominal over the current ls7 intake! just my thoughts.
Old 08-22-2006, 06:25 PM
  #37  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Stang's Bane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mont Belvieu, TX
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iv-internal-engine/559481-fast-intake-ls7.html
Old 08-22-2006, 06:35 PM
  #38  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Stang's Bane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mont Belvieu, TX
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

By the way, I don't believe 600 rwhp is a given with that small of a cam. Look up Jason at Katech's response to the question. I know the heads and intake flow great, but 600rwhp is very stout on a 427. I am going to go with a sheet metal on PORTED ls7's and a 25x x 26x and see how much that gets me. Also with the way that the ls7 style heads flow with a big intake bias, more split is in order than 4 deg. With how high the intake flow is on these heads, the exhaust would have to flow damn near 300 itself to justify that little split. someone please correct me if I am wrong, this is just what I have gathered from hundreds of hours of research and asking lot's of stupid questions. Patrick G., do you have any thoughts on cam setup on a ls7 head and sheetmetal topend. I realize driveability will prob. suck ***, but it will be a weekend toy, and most of those weekends will be going down the track. Sorry for the hijack.
Old 08-24-2006, 02:05 PM
  #39  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
mike c.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: mi
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

i've been talking w/sponcers about a 427ci. LME-has a nice 427ci longblock w/gm ls7 heads reworked(ported)and a ls7 ported intake. it comes w/every thing needed to put it in a f-body. do you guys think the ET head is better then a gm ported ls7 head??? what do you guys think of the quality at LME??
Old 08-24-2006, 02:45 PM
  #40  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
11 Bravo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 3,078
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by mike c.
do you guys think the ET head is better then a gm ported ls7 head???
No. I think the best setup for a 427 is with LS7 heads and intake. Unless you want to start talking about big bucks with a Harrop intake. The ET heads are nice for sure, but they don't seem to have taken the big motors to the next level like everyone was hoping. I'm sure the intake is a big part of it. They should have designed the heads to fit a LS7 intake. Especially since it's cheaper than the FAST.


Quick Reply: power difference between 402ci & 427ci w/same heads and cam?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:09 AM.