Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

L92/l76 402 cam??? Now I need it.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-08-2006, 07:06 PM
  #1  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
WKMCD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 3,416
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default L92/l76 402 cam??? Now I need it.

I had my C5 out today and got a little whiff of coolant in the exhaust when I stopped. Coolant level looked OK but about 100 miles later the low coolant light cam on so it 's looking like the 402 is now on the front burner.

I've got the L76 manifold and the L92 heads are on the way. The ls2 402 is in process. I want to start assembly in the next ten days or so.

The problem is there are no proven cams out there for this combination so this is everyones opportunity to help me spec a cam. We've got to start somewhere with these new heads. I'l take one for the team.

I'm currently running an LS1 H/C car with a 230-236 112 +2 XE-R, PRC 2.5R heads 62cc, 90/90, 3.90's, M6, etc/etc/etc and SD tune. I want to stay close to the same drivability. The car will never see a track but is used for trips, ocassional commuting and sometimes DD during nice weather and hard flogging every chance I get.

Based on the stock flow numbers Comp Cams is suggesting a 228-240 114. I really prefer a tighter LSA for more under the curve power. The 402 will use 2cc pistons which should net about 11.2:1 SDR. I want to keep the DCR mid 8's. We do have 93 octane here. Emissions not a problem.

Any and all suggestions and recommendations appreciated. If you can please explain your choice a little.

Vendors very welcome to play along. Let me know what you would offer.

Thanks

Kevin McD
Northern VA

Last edited by WKMCD; 09-09-2006 at 01:49 PM.
Old 09-08-2006, 07:29 PM
  #2  
TECH Resident
 
98blackSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Lexington Park, MD
Posts: 922
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Haven't you had issues with this coolant stuff before? What was wrong last time?
Old 09-08-2006, 07:47 PM
  #3  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
WKMCD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 3,416
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 98blackSS
Haven't you had issues with this coolant stuff before? What was wrong last time?
Cometics before...Not sure this time. Before was about 8k miles ago... Not sure what it is this time...Oh well, this just accelerates the new setup.
Old 09-08-2006, 08:41 PM
  #4  
TECH Apprentice
 
JBsZ06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Can't give you an opinion on the cam but I'm checking in because it sounds like an awesome way to go...

Can you give us a cost estimate so far? and then again when complete.

Thanks and I think your choices here are the hot ticket.

JB
Old 09-08-2006, 10:35 PM
  #5  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (12)
 
Wnts2Go10O's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rockville, MD
Posts: 4,354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

with the intake/exhaust ratio, a split is your friend ~6* or more.
Old 09-09-2006, 06:30 AM
  #6  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Stang's Bane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mont Belvieu, TX
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I think you will get alot more accurate suggestions after you get the Intake and heads flowed together. Are you planning to do any port work on the heads or leave them stock?
Old 09-09-2006, 11:41 AM
  #7  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
WKMCD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 3,416
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Stang's Bane
I think you will get alot more accurate suggestions after you get the Intake and heads flowed together. Are you planning to do any port work on the heads or leave them stock?
They will probably go on stock for now. If people are showing big numbers with them ported - I do that later. No one is ready to port the heads yet.
Old 09-09-2006, 11:51 AM
  #8  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
slow trap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: tennessee
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i've heare those heads are alittle weak on the exhaust port so as allready stated you will probably need 6-8 * more duration on the exhaust side.how about something like a 240/248 on xer lobes ground on a 110 ?
Old 09-09-2006, 12:21 PM
  #9  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Stang's Bane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mont Belvieu, TX
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I would have to do the I/E ratio, but I think it is similiar to an LS7 head. An unported LS7 likes quite a bit of split at least 15*. I am not even gonna try to suggest specific duration #'s, but I thought that this might help for FWIW.
Old 09-09-2006, 01:25 PM
  #10  
On The Tree
 
corvettetimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WKMCD
I've got the L76 manifold and the L98 heads are on the way. The ls2 402 is in process. I want to start assembly in the next ten days or so.

Thats awesome, looks like a revival of the TPI heads on a 402 . J/k Im sure you meant l92.
Old 09-09-2006, 01:26 PM
  #11  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
WKMCD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 3,416
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Stang's Bane
I would have to do the I/E ratio, but I think it is similiar to an LS7 head. An unported LS7 likes quite a bit of split at least 15*. I am not even gonna try to suggest specific duration #'s, but I thought that this might help for FWIW.
Thanks, your right about the split. I really think it's going to be 10-12 degrees.
Old 09-09-2006, 01:30 PM
  #12  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
WKMCD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 3,416
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by corvettetimmy
Thats awesome, looks like a revival of the TPI heads on a 402 . J/k Im sure you meant l92.
OOOPS! L92
Old 09-11-2006, 07:41 PM
  #13  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
1CAMWNDR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I would say a 10° split or so.
How about a Comp XFI:

286° 242° 156° .604"
302° 253° 166° .615"
110° LSA +4° (106° ICL)
Intake valve closes at 69° ABDC

Or how about a milder ramp Xtreme RPM High lift:

297° 244° 160° .595"
307° 254° 169° .595"
110° LSA +4° (106° ICL)
Intake valve closes at 74.5° ABDC

The problem with those cams in the overlap at .050".......27.5° and 29° respectively .
Old 09-11-2006, 07:54 PM
  #14  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
SStrokerAce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 2,344
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

A stock head is going to need the most split, and more than 10°

Bret
Old 09-11-2006, 07:59 PM
  #15  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
DONAIMIAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NW Houston, TX
Posts: 10,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1CAMWNDR
The problem with those cams in the overlap at .050".......27.5° and 29° respectively .
Ehh its people running 30ish in stock cube motors. Im sure thoes 402 cubes will soak that up.
Old 09-11-2006, 09:29 PM
  #16  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
1CAMWNDR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DONAIMIAN
Ehh its people running 30ish in stock cube motors. Im sure thoes 402 cubes will soak that up.
I see. I am just used to trying to keep the overlap around 8°-10°......but that is for cam only set-ups I think.....
Old 09-12-2006, 06:47 AM
  #17  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
WKMCD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 3,416
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Thanks guys. I think it's going to be 12-14 degrees of split with the stock L92's. The disparity between the intake and the exhaust is huge. Pretty sure that I want to keep the intake fairly mild to take advantage of the big flow numbers and run the exhaust out to a more conventional 402 number.

Also want to keep the intake closing pretty low ABDC for some great under the curve power. The perfect cam will let me stomp on it in 3rd at 3k and light up the tires. I'm not looking for the absolute highest high RPM RWHP.

Just a reminder, this is not a track car. I use it as a DD on nice days and take it on trips and around town. I do pound on it regularly though. Currently running a full H/C w/ 230-236 112 XE-R and I like the drivability I have now.

Let's keep this dicussion going.

Last edited by WKMCD; 09-12-2006 at 07:46 AM.
Old 09-12-2006, 08:03 AM
  #18  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
SStrokerAce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 2,344
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

With what you have now for a cam you can definately tolerate the right sized cam for what you are going to run in the L92 402. The problem without porting the exhausts on a L92 head is that you are going to have a bad E/I ratio, that doesn't mean everything when it comes to the camshaft split but it does play into it.

Bret
Old 09-12-2006, 11:41 AM
  #19  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
WKMCD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 3,416
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SStrokerAce
With what you have now for a cam you can definately tolerate the right sized cam for what you are going to run in the L92 402. The problem without porting the exhausts on a L92 head is that you are going to have a bad E/I ratio, that doesn't mean everything when it comes to the camshaft split but it does play into it.

Bret
Comp suggested a 228-240 113 XE-R based on the stock flow numbers and the conversatoin I had with them..

Maybe it's a starting poing for discussion.
Old 09-12-2006, 12:11 PM
  #20  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
SStrokerAce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 2,344
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I don't really discuss cam specs, that's for LS1tech and once everyone becomes a cam designer I move on to something more interesting, hence the L92 stuff. IMHO I think they are not taking the valve sizes and cubes into account if that's the cam they come up with, from some preliminary numbers I was working on before it's not close to what I came up with.

Bret


Quick Reply: L92/l76 402 cam??? Now I need it.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:09 AM.