6.0 + L92 Heads + Carb = streetable build for under $6k?
#1
6.0 + L92 Heads + Carb = streetable build for under $6k?
I am looking to build a mild LSX to retrofit into a 67 Camaro within a budget of 5k-6k. What I want to accomplish is the following:
- Around 500 streetable hp at the flywheel.
- Carburated Intake (mostly for cost, but partially for asthetic reasons).
- Enough vacuum to keep the power brakes working fine.
The build would be based on:
- 6L truck block, preferably LQ9
- L92 Heads without any porting
- Carburated Intake with appropriately sized carb (probably 750 CFM)
- Cam TBD, but preferrably on the mild side
Here is my line of thinking:
There probably isn't a better starting point than an LS type engine for building serious streetable power in a GM car. The L92 heads should prove to be a great starting place based on the flow numbers under .600" lift, but the minimum bore that will work with them is a 4.0", so I need either an LS2, an LQ4 or an LQ9. As I mentioned earlier, I would like to go with a carb, but that is ok since GM already released a carb intake.
Since the car isn't going to be for drag racing, I am not interested in getting every last drop of power, I just want something that will be easy to build, look a little different than everything else out there, and be a ton of fun to drive.
Now for my concerns:
I am basically trying to build an engine around the L92 heads based on their price/performance potential. Their are three potential problems here. The first is that the Carb. Intake is a single plane piece which I am guessing was probably designed more for racing than for streetability. The second is that while the heads fit on a 4.0" bore, that doesn't mean that they would work well on a mild 6.0L engine. The intake volume on these heads is HUGE, which isn't neccisarily a bad thing if they maintain decent velocity / flow characteristics at lower RPMs, but I worry that they might be too big for 6 liters. The third and final issue is of cost. I am not looking to spend a ton of money here (one of the main reasons I am attracted to the L92 heads is their low cost). I guess I could just pick up an Carburated LS2 Crate engine for around $5,600, but where is the fun in that?
So what do you guys think? Am I just throwing parts together that won't work? Is my budget unrealistic? Are my goals out of line? If so, what would be the best way to do what I am looking to do?
Thanks in advance for your thoughts,
Greg Hamlin
- Around 500 streetable hp at the flywheel.
- Carburated Intake (mostly for cost, but partially for asthetic reasons).
- Enough vacuum to keep the power brakes working fine.
The build would be based on:
- 6L truck block, preferably LQ9
- L92 Heads without any porting
- Carburated Intake with appropriately sized carb (probably 750 CFM)
- Cam TBD, but preferrably on the mild side
Here is my line of thinking:
There probably isn't a better starting point than an LS type engine for building serious streetable power in a GM car. The L92 heads should prove to be a great starting place based on the flow numbers under .600" lift, but the minimum bore that will work with them is a 4.0", so I need either an LS2, an LQ4 or an LQ9. As I mentioned earlier, I would like to go with a carb, but that is ok since GM already released a carb intake.
Since the car isn't going to be for drag racing, I am not interested in getting every last drop of power, I just want something that will be easy to build, look a little different than everything else out there, and be a ton of fun to drive.
Now for my concerns:
I am basically trying to build an engine around the L92 heads based on their price/performance potential. Their are three potential problems here. The first is that the Carb. Intake is a single plane piece which I am guessing was probably designed more for racing than for streetability. The second is that while the heads fit on a 4.0" bore, that doesn't mean that they would work well on a mild 6.0L engine. The intake volume on these heads is HUGE, which isn't neccisarily a bad thing if they maintain decent velocity / flow characteristics at lower RPMs, but I worry that they might be too big for 6 liters. The third and final issue is of cost. I am not looking to spend a ton of money here (one of the main reasons I am attracted to the L92 heads is their low cost). I guess I could just pick up an Carburated LS2 Crate engine for around $5,600, but where is the fun in that?
So what do you guys think? Am I just throwing parts together that won't work? Is my budget unrealistic? Are my goals out of line? If so, what would be the best way to do what I am looking to do?
Thanks in advance for your thoughts,
Greg Hamlin
#3
TECH Veteran
i had nearly 9-10k in the last stroker (408 iron) i had..including fuel system and everything. With the price of shortblocks now...and these heads....under 6-7k for the same 500+rwhp motors of a year or 2 ago is gonna be possible.
#4
TECH Regular
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Arlington, TN
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.gmhightechperformance.com...ine_l92_heads/
the carb l92 manifold + ls2 short block + l92 heads + 232/236 cam = 545 crank ponies.
Plus the torque curve is just f'n nice too.
It would probably have been better with a 232/240 or 232/244 cam and have the heads tweaked on the exhaust side but still it should exceed what you are looking for in price and performance.
the carb l92 manifold + ls2 short block + l92 heads + 232/236 cam = 545 crank ponies.
Plus the torque curve is just f'n nice too.
It would probably have been better with a 232/240 or 232/244 cam and have the heads tweaked on the exhaust side but still it should exceed what you are looking for in price and performance.
#5
Bring the Noise:
Thanks for the link. I read the article, but since they were running fuel injection through the carb intake, I don't know if it really answers my question with regards to the streetability issue. FI can do a lot to tame a motor running with a single plane intake.
My concern remains the viability of running a street car with power brakes, power steering and AC with this motor/intake combo.
Anyone have a clue how much vacuum you could pull down with a carb on this thing?
Also, does anyone have an idea what RPM range the intake was designed for?
Greg
Thanks for the link. I read the article, but since they were running fuel injection through the carb intake, I don't know if it really answers my question with regards to the streetability issue. FI can do a lot to tame a motor running with a single plane intake.
My concern remains the viability of running a street car with power brakes, power steering and AC with this motor/intake combo.
Anyone have a clue how much vacuum you could pull down with a carb on this thing?
Also, does anyone have an idea what RPM range the intake was designed for?
Greg
#6
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: by my computer
Posts: 2,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 67 Rally Sport
Bring the Noise:
Thanks for the link. I read the article, but since they were running fuel injection through the carb intake, I don't know if it really answers my question with regards to the streetability issue. FI can do a lot to tame a motor running with a single plane intake.
My concern remains the viability of running a street car with power brakes, power steering and AC with this motor/intake combo.
Anyone have a clue how much vacuum you could pull down with a carb on this thing?
Also, does anyone have an idea what RPM range the intake was designed for?
Greg
Thanks for the link. I read the article, but since they were running fuel injection through the carb intake, I don't know if it really answers my question with regards to the streetability issue. FI can do a lot to tame a motor running with a single plane intake.
My concern remains the viability of running a street car with power brakes, power steering and AC with this motor/intake combo.
Anyone have a clue how much vacuum you could pull down with a carb on this thing?
Also, does anyone have an idea what RPM range the intake was designed for?
Greg
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Depending on what rotating assembly you are using, it should be a piece of cake to hit your price. I just bought a 6.0 truck iron block for $300. It was a dealer takeout for piston slap, and as far as we could tell there wasn't a thing wrong with it (other than piston slap). If you could get something like that, you could just hone it and re-ring it and get WAY under your price point. Or just replace the pistons and reuse the stock crank and rods.
-Geoff
-Geoff