L92's on a Big Bore 388 I have a Ls2 that has needs one of the sleeves replaced. I am thinking about sending out and having all new sleeves installed and going with a 4.125 bore and stock stroke. Has any one else done this? I think that the larger bore and more cubic inches are going to make the L92 heads work better than being on a 6.0??? |
I'm also considering L92s instead of Stage 2 CNC'd LS1 heads on my 4.125" block. I'm unsure if stock L92s will perform that much differently than ported LS1 heads. |
My 387 all-bore engine will be getting L92's. The guy that owned this 387 shortblock before me had some heavily ported TEA LS1 style heads that put down 473rwhp on a mustang dyno. Should be real interesting to see how the L92's do in comparison. :) You planning to go with dry sleeves or wet? Mike |
I haven't looked to much into the differences in dry or wet sleeves so I am going to start researching it tonight. I have read that the darton sleeves are the way to go. |
Originally Posted by 355ss I have a Ls2 that has needs one of the sleeves replaced. I am thinking about sending out and having all new sleeves installed and going with a 4.125 bore and stock stroke. Has any one else done this? I think that the larger bore and more cubic inches are going to make the L92 heads work better than being on a 6.0??? Should make for a great rpm motor and VERY responsive ! ! :cheers: |
I'm the one who sold the 388 or 387 or whatever it was, I liked it, I had 317's that flowed similar to ported L92's except better on the exaust side and smaller runner. I made that 473 with a smaller cam and an LS6 90mm intake setup. The car moved and loved to rev, the only thing is if you are going to buy a 2600 block and 550 pistons, 500 rods, whats another 1000 for a 4 inch crank? Of course that kind of thinking is what got me into my current predicament....... |
Wouldn't it be more to sleeve a block than to just buy an L92 block and bore it? Maybe not. I wouldn't know. :) |
I bet you will be able to rev that thing to the moon, with proper valvetrain of course. |
Originally Posted by blown4.6 I bet you will be able to rev that thing to the moon, with proper valvetrain of course. |
Short stroke big bore motors rev quick and make big power in a narrow peak range. That would be an awesome motor with great top end power, it will have low end power, but it won't have the killer low end torque of a 4" crank. |
Steve @ R.E.D. does not like the L92 block for resleeving. |
I had an email conversation with Steve @ R.E.D., great guy! Dry sleeves on an LS2 are much less expensive than wet sleeves on an LS1, and LS6 blocks are not recommended for a resleeve. R.E.D. provides LS2 dry sleeves in 4.125-4.190", but not bigger than 4.150" for FI or nitrous. I've seen Darton M.I.D. sleeves on ebay selling for $1,400, but for $260 more you could have your LS2 sleeved which includes stress relief work. |
So how much $$$ for a dry sleeved 4.125" LS2 ???...Or is it less expensive than buying the LS7 block ? |
I found an LS7 block for $2,366 from gmpartsdirect (list price is $3,250). I'm unsure if an LS7 can be resleeved or bored much. I'm unsure, but I think a dry oil sump system is needed. If you have an LS2 block, R.E.D. will stress relief the block, install sleeves, and deck the block for $1,670 (top secret info I got from Steve). $120 for stress relief, $800 for sleeves with installation of $750. Sleeves can be replaced in a sleeved block, and bore can go to 4.190". |
Originally Posted by Greg Fell Steve @ R.E.D. does not like the L92 block for resleeving. |
Does anyone have any insight on how the l92 heads perform on a 4.125" bore vs the smaller 4.00" |
Originally Posted by Ryne @ CMS yeah my l92 block was the first l92 block he resleeved, he got it done perfectly, but he said the sleeves were in the block crooked, especially number 7 cylinder i believe. I've heard this MANY times, is the quality starting to improve?..If not it seems like LS2 or LS7 are the way to go |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:44 PM. |
© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands