Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Low Compression N/A Build opinions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-16-2008, 12:19 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Bucktooth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Low Compression N/A Build opinions

I am considering doing a N/A 454lsx engine. Eventually in a few years I want to do a F/I setup, but for the meantime a N/A N20 build will suffice.
This is my question, if I build the motor to something like 8.7:1 compression ratio for the future F/I build will this work fine minus the roughly 3-4% loss per compression point?
For example i see alot of 454lsx motors putting out 550rwhp, will my 3 pts of compression really kill around 60rwhp? I have heard other issues such as torque loss etc..
Plans are E85 tune, Big Cam, good flowing heads, 2" headers etc...
Whats your input?
I hate to lose all that hp, but pulling out the motor in a couple years and rebuilding for low compression doesnt sound like much of an option.

Last edited by Bucktooth; 07-16-2008 at 12:25 PM.
Old 07-16-2008, 01:23 PM
  #2  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Stang's Bane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mont Belvieu, TX
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

E85 and low compression are not good bed fellows.

If it were me. I would build to about 10:1, run gasoline for now and when you get ready to boost the motor, switch to e-85. Optimal for neither, but compromises rarely are.

Or if you want run a smaller combustion chamber on your heads for now and when you get ready to boost the motor, pull the heads and replace with larger ones.

These are just options. You need to figure out hom much you want out of it after it is boosted. When you really turn the wick up, ring selection changes. Like I said earlier compromises are never the best for either of the things compromised.
Old 07-16-2008, 03:06 PM
  #3  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Bucktooth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Can you use boosted rings for non boosted applications? Or is that a dumb question? They prly wouldnt seat well i would imagine.

Might have to consider switching pistons at a later date and run close to 12:1 compression now....
Old 07-16-2008, 07:33 PM
  #4  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (40)
 
veee8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Raleigh,North Carolina
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It is not necessarily the rings, it is the gaps that have to be opened up when running FI or N2O.
Old 07-17-2008, 09:26 AM
  #5  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Stang's Bane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mont Belvieu, TX
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I think ring material has something to do with it also.

But I have been wrong before.
Old 07-17-2008, 11:20 AM
  #6  
FormerVendor
 
racer7088's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,065
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Arrow

I was talking to them and Wiseco has this piston available which could set you up in NA form at least. You'd probably need a real blower piston if you want to make big power later but of it's for a few years I would rather have the right pistons for NA during that time.

""The k462f185 piston has a -3cc .215 tall solid dome and nets about 12.0 with a 70cc head and the typical 4.185 bore/4.125 stroke. That same piston with the dome leveled off to flat top nets -7cc. That's an 11g difference in gram weight and wouldn't affect balance badly, but would drop the compression about 1/2 a point without affecting the strength of the piston.""

If not probably as Stang's Bane said you could do something that would be somewhere in between.




Starting with a 72cc chamber shouldn't be tough to find and would net a 11.9 ratio to start and 11.4:1 after the mill. There are quite a few people running boost w/ e85 at 11 to 11.5:1 with no issues.
Old 07-17-2008, 11:39 AM
  #7  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (24)
 
Haans249's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 2,045
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by racer7088
I was talking to them and Wiseco has this piston available which could set you up in NA form at least. You'd probably need a real blower piston if you want to make big power later but of it's for a few years I would rather have the right pistons for NA during that time.

""The k462f185 piston has a -3cc .215 tall solid dome and nets about 12.0 with a 70cc head and the typical 4.185 bore/4.125 stroke. That same piston with the dome leveled off to flat top nets -7cc. That's an 11g difference in gram weight and wouldn't affect balance badly, but would drop the compression about 1/2 a point without affecting the strength of the piston.""

If not probably as Stang's Bane said you could do something that would be somewhere in between.


Starting with a 72cc chamber shouldn't be tough to find and would net a 11.9 ratio to start and 11.4:1 after the mill. There are quite a few people running boost w/ e85 at 11 to 11.5:1 with no issues.
How much boost have you heard that you can safely run with e85 and compression that high?
Old 07-17-2008, 11:46 AM
  #8  
FormerVendor
 
racer7088's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,065
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Arrow

Originally Posted by Haans249
How much boost have you heard that you can safely run with e85 and compression that high?
Oh I would drop the compression to maybe 9.5 to 1 for boost and run a different piston but I know you can run a little more that that with E85 although I would just keep that as detonation insurance and not go crazy on the boost compression.
Old 07-17-2008, 01:14 PM
  #9  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Stang's Bane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mont Belvieu, TX
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

From what I have seen, E85 is safe at 1.0 to 1.5 higher than gasoline at the same boost levels. ON top of that, it makes more HP out of boost due to the higher compression. If you have access to it, e85 is great HP fuel.
Old 07-17-2008, 01:58 PM
  #10  
TECH Regular
 
briannutter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

E-85 is about 103 octane. That particular piston is .250" thick in the crown and 2618 alloy. It will take Nitrous or boost well.
Old 07-21-2008, 06:48 AM
  #11  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Bucktooth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by racer7088
I was talking to them and Wiseco has this piston available which could set you up in NA form at least. You'd probably need a real blower piston if you want to make big power later but of it's for a few years I would rather have the right pistons for NA during that time.

""The k462f185 piston has a -3cc .215 tall solid dome and nets about 12.0 with a 70cc head and the typical 4.185 bore/4.125 stroke. That same piston with the dome leveled off to flat top nets -7cc. That's an 11g difference in gram weight and wouldn't affect balance badly, but would drop the compression about 1/2 a point without affecting the strength of the piston.""

If not probably as Stang's Bane said you could do something that would be somewhere in between.




Starting with a 72cc chamber shouldn't be tough to find and would net a 11.9 ratio to start and 11.4:1 after the mill. There are quite a few people running boost w/ e85 at 11 to 11.5:1 with no issues.

So cant i put in a real blower piston now? Ill be shooting it with plenty of N2O.
Old 07-21-2008, 10:49 AM
  #12  
FormerVendor
 
racer7088's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,065
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Yes you could you will just have lower power on motor with the low compression but besides that you'd be fine.
Old 07-21-2008, 10:58 PM
  #13  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Bucktooth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by racer7088
Yes you could you will just have lower power on motor with the low compression but besides that you'd be fine.
Ill take 480-500rwhp for now!



Quick Reply: Low Compression N/A Build opinions



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:36 PM.