CC306 1/8th times and dyno graph inside
10-13-2008, 07:09 PM
#21
crank the timing up and run good gas in it...
i ran 37 in mine....on 93 octane...
my car cam only with bolt ons ran 7.5x at 91..
you need to get rid of that junk TCI stall you have!!!!!!!! get rid of it as fast as you can...get a good yank or vigilante...and i gaurantee youll dyno more...run faster...more mph and drive better...
i ran 37 in mine....on 93 octane...
my car cam only with bolt ons ran 7.5x at 91..
you need to get rid of that junk TCI stall you have!!!!!!!! get rid of it as fast as you can...get a good yank or vigilante...and i gaurantee youll dyno more...run faster...more mph and drive better...
10-13-2008, 09:03 PM
#22
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Charleston, S.C.
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think I am going to throw my et streets on the car and see what it will do this sunday. I actually like my TCI converter... It drives well and hits hard. I will probably invest in a dyno tune here soon as well. If I can get 7.6's out of it before I hit it with the 200 I will be happy. I wish I had the cash for some heads...
10-13-2008, 09:42 PM
#23
problem is the tci are good stalls for launching but they arent very efficient up top...so it might launch the same as a yank or vig but will not mph what one of those will...i dont think they are built to the tight tolerances like these guys...i woudlent be surprised if you picked up 3 mph in the 1.8 from just a converter change
10-13-2008, 11:39 PM
#24
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Charleston, S.C.
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hmm... makes sense. The car does feel sluggish up top from a roll compared to other converter cars but still hit's just as hard. I just thought it might be the trans starting to slip slightly. Maybe I will look into a vig when I get my taxes back.
10-14-2008, 12:56 AM
#25
you guys saying he has crappy dyno numbers have to realize:
1) ITS AN AUTOMATIC WITH A BIG STALL
2) as for torque #s, the graph is starting way after torque peak.
330 through an auto would probably be around 350 through a 6 speed, which is about on par with what a cc306 should make.
just a reduction in 60 foot to a 1.6x would drop your ET close to a 7.70.
also what do you have your rev limiter set at?
1) ITS AN AUTOMATIC WITH A BIG STALL
2) as for torque #s, the graph is starting way after torque peak.
330 through an auto would probably be around 350 through a 6 speed, which is about on par with what a cc306 should make.
just a reduction in 60 foot to a 1.6x would drop your ET close to a 7.70.
also what do you have your rev limiter set at?
03-24-2009, 04:32 PM
#26
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Charleston, S.C.
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well guys the transmission tore up a few days after this thread was made, I am thinking a bad transmission was part of the equation when it came to the dyno numbers. Since then I have installed a built transmission, custom converter, lowered the shift points to 6500, added a ported intake and got some 27x11.5 QTP's. The car feels totally different now and I am not chasing down my shifting issues like I had been for over a year. We think the transmission was slipping the whole time. My converter was also fried. I am hoping for 7.5x's @ 90-91ish this coming sunday.
What are your thoughts?!
What are your thoughts?!
03-24-2009, 05:58 PM
#28
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Charleston, S.C.
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I sure hope so, I really think the transmission had alot to do with the time it ran and the numbers it layed down. It can only get faster from here though!
03-24-2009, 06:00 PM
#29
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Charleston, S.C.
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
crank the timing up and run good gas in it...
i ran 37 in mine....on 93 octane...
my car cam only with bolt ons ran 7.5x at 91..
you need to get rid of that junk TCI stall you have!!!!!!!! get rid of it as fast as you can...get a good yank or vigilante...and i gaurantee youll dyno more...run faster...more mph and drive better...
i ran 37 in mine....on 93 octane...
my car cam only with bolt ons ran 7.5x at 91..
you need to get rid of that junk TCI stall you have!!!!!!!! get rid of it as fast as you can...get a good yank or vigilante...and i gaurantee youll dyno more...run faster...more mph and drive better...
I thought about playing with the timing but I am some what apprehensive due to running 11:1 SRP's and Impala gaskets.
03-24-2009, 06:56 PM
#31
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Charleston, S.C.
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know how that goes, I will be putting it back on the dyno APR. 11th. I am really anxious to see how the car runs this weekend. I have never run it on slicks or dr's so it should be entertaining. I am debating on taking the front swaybar off considering the rest of my suspension is bone stock, just the way it came from factory in 94.
03-24-2009, 11:23 PM
#36
as for dyno numbers you have a stalled auto, those numbers would equate to around 350-360rwhp, for reference my cc503 stock heads car made 325rwhp through an unlocked 3000 stall
tci's are pretty loose from my experience
60': 2.032
E/T 8.178
MPH: 87.847
E/T 8.178
MPH: 87.847
also that 88mph ET is good for around 112mph trap in the 1/4 which is well on par with your approx power/weight
Last edited by myltwon; 03-24-2009 at 11:29 PM.
