Eagle doesn't recommend using fluid damper?? I called Eagle today about what they recommended for a harmonic balancer for their forged cranks. I was just planning on using a fluid damper, but i asked if that was a good choice and they said they didn't recommend it. I asked why, and all they would say was we just dont recommend it?? Anyone have any idea why?? |
I run one on mine. No problems so far 8k on the motor. |
i do not like fluid damper for the simple fact my balancer was DRY after 2-months they would not take care of it either! |
Originally Posted by 96lt1m6
(Post 11180514)
i do not like fluid damper for the simple fact my balancer was DRY after 2-months they would not take care of it either! These are sealed units, I just don't see how anyone could tell, unless the seal was gone and there was evidence of leaking? |
Or, could you hear the 'ring' inside rattling around? |
Unless they can give you some concrete info, take it with a grain of salt. Lot of the guys who answer the phones are good at reading off sheet and recomending stuff. Every once in a while you go get some one who knows their stuff. I went with the ATI Super Dampner on mine, stock crank though. |
Originally Posted by 95 TA - The Beast
(Post 11182104)
How could you tell it was 'dry'??? These are sealed units, I just don't see how anyone could tell, unless the seal was gone and there was evidence of leaking? |
I mean, honestly, I have one one my 350 Z28 right now and with the new 383 I was planning on moving it over to it... Now, I have done some research and there is some 'controversy' (or shall I say 'grumbling' as the quantity of commentary is so low) on the internet in regards to Fluidamper and NASCAR, as well as BBC crank snouts breaking with them, and some saying that SCAT or Eagle don't recommend them... But, the biggest thing here is, there is no concrete information that I could find in regards to guidelines of what is failing, how it is happening, under what circumstances (such as >7000rpm?) or inwhat applications (as in is it a BBC version issue?), etc... In checking with a number of people I trust in the engine building world there are some that state that Fluidamper is the only thing they will run for a street motor, and others state they choose ATI or Rattlers, but the biggest concensus is that ANYTHING SFI is fine on a street motor running less than 7000rpm and <700hp... Above that is where people start getting particular... |
Originally Posted by kinglt-1
(Post 11182446)
I was wondering the same? Shit i better check mine, also while im there ill check my "Blinker Fluid", don't want it to dry up either lol j/k. i have friends with them also that have had no issues in-fact one friend has had his since the early 90s. |
So you guys think i'd be ok running a fluid damper on a eagle crank? |
Originally Posted by 93 black t/a
(Post 11187131)
So you guys think i'd be ok running a fluid damper on a eagle crank? I found nothing in all my searches that point to any sort of LT1 failure with one, or any sort of issues with LT1s running Fluidampers. And I am even going to be running it with a SCAT 9000 crank, yet I don't see any potential issues. I am going to be staying below 7000rpm and looking at 550hp at the crank... |
I wouldn't feel comfortable running an Eagle crank. |
Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
(Post 11188394)
I wouldn't feel comfortable running an Eagle crank. |
It could be in regards to Eagle being aware of having problems with their crank snouts being out of tolerance. |
Originally Posted by 93 black t/a
(Post 11180468)
I called Eagle today about what they recommended for a harmonic balancer for their forged cranks. I was just planning on using a fluid damper, but i asked if that was a good choice and they said they didn't recommend it. I asked why, and all they would say was we just dont recommend it?? Anyone have any idea why?? |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:34 PM. |
© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands