LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

How sweet would a 434 SBC LT1 BE?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-25-2009, 08:39 AM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
96blackz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Centreville, VA
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default How sweet would a 434 SBC LT1 BE?

*NEW* Pump Gas 434 Small Block Chevy
* Ohio Crankshaft 4340 x 4.00 crank
* 6.88 OC H-beam rods
* SRP professional dish pistons
* 1.5 - 1.5 - 3.0 plasma moly ring
* Federal Mogul race bearings
* Internally Balanced

Ohiocrankshafts new rotating assembly... Priced well

Thoughts?

I dont want to do it, I am going with their forged Street Rodder 383 assembly
Old 08-25-2009, 09:09 AM
  #2  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (12)
 
1badzee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SFL
Posts: 3,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't understand the point of this thread. It says in the title how sweet would it be ..." " then you say, I don't want to do it - like someone is making you do it.. 0_o what gives?
Old 08-25-2009, 09:19 AM
  #3  
hashtagBMW
iTrader: (38)
 
Speed Density's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 6,572
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

So this is about at 434" SBC? Because nothing makes that short an LT1
Old 08-25-2009, 09:29 AM
  #4  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (12)
 
1badzee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SFL
Posts: 3,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Speed Density
So this is about at 434" SBC? Because nothing makes that short an LT1
Old 08-25-2009, 09:31 AM
  #5  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (7)
 
z28mccrory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Southern Indiana
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Slightly less sweet than a 434 LSX?





.....sorry... had to
Old 08-25-2009, 10:10 AM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
96blackz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Centreville, VA
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by z28mccrory
Slightly less sweet than a 434 LSX?





.....sorry... had to
Hah! But are you guys saying not possible in LT1? I was posting this because ohio crank recently released this kit, thats all.. just wondering thoughts on it, and if it cant work in an LT1 car.. why is that?
Old 08-25-2009, 10:30 AM
  #7  
Village Troll
iTrader: (2)
 
SS RRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Jackstandican
Posts: 11,003
Received 517 Likes on 373 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by z28mccrory
Slightly less sweet than a 434 LSX?
Indeed, just as long as it's built right.
Originally Posted by 96blackz28
Hah! But are you guys saying not possible in LT1? I was posting this because ohio crank recently released this kit, thats all.. just wondering thoughts on it, and if it cant work in an LT1 car.. why is that?
Because you would need a 4.15 bore. The most a stock LT1 block should be bored is 4.06 and that's pushing it and the block should be thoroughly sonic checked before boring that much. Not to mention a 4" stroke would need block fill because the extra clearance would be going into the water jackets in the pan rail. It can be done. There have been those who've done 420+CID LT1 engines, but had to sleeve the block. Not only is that costly, but it really takes someone who knows what they're doing to make it work. The cost just does not justify the means.
Old 08-25-2009, 11:13 AM
  #8  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (22)
 
camar0corey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Spring Hill, FL
Posts: 3,975
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Eh I'm not impressed most of the time by cubic inches anymore. This isn't the 60's you don't need a huge engine to produce huge power anymore.
Old 08-25-2009, 01:00 PM
  #9  
TECH Regular
 
JAKEJR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Kempner, TX
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What block are they using? The new Dart LT1 block that's soon to be released?

I built a 434 for a friend using a GM L98-type block; no filling needed.

Jake

West Point ROCKS! Nation's TOP COLLEGE per Forbes Magazine!
Old 08-25-2009, 01:57 PM
  #10  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (88)
 
the_merv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: The Beach...
Posts: 19,260
Received 58 Likes on 51 Posts

Default

I want to see the specs on that setup.. they may have a Kit, but like mentioned above, you have to be able to get that into a Block.

I see that one taking alot of $$$ to get running properly.
Old 08-25-2009, 03:09 PM
  #11  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
96blackz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Centreville, VA
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Oh nevermind then, thanks for the input. I was curious if it could be done, I wouldnt want to, I know it would cost triple what a 383 kit would run me when its all said and done.

And like i said, it is a new kit they released, just wondered if any one knew **** about it, but 383 for the win or a 408... right merv?
Old 08-25-2009, 03:14 PM
  #12  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (88)
 
the_merv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: The Beach...
Posts: 19,260
Received 58 Likes on 51 Posts

Default

Mines doin alrite..
Old 08-25-2009, 08:05 PM
  #13  
Village Troll
iTrader: (2)
 
SS RRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Jackstandican
Posts: 11,003
Received 517 Likes on 373 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JAKEJR
I built a 434 for a friend using a GM L98-type block;
That's saying something when many many that I've read and heard as well as talking to different machine shops have all run into water at some point or another clearancing blocks for a 3.875" stroke. Perhaps the pan rails are a tad thicker on a L98 style?
Originally Posted by the_merv
Mines doin alrite..
Your what?
Old 08-25-2009, 08:40 PM
  #14  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
96blackz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Centreville, VA
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SS RRR
That's saying something when many many that I've read and heard as well as talking to different machine shops have all run into water at some point or another clearancing blocks for a 3.875" stroke. Perhaps the pan rails are a tad thicker on a L98 style?

Your what?
hehe.. he was talking about his lil 408.


I just got back from the strip by my house, a Turbo 02 Trans am was running 9.3 at 151mph... i was quite impressed. LT1s r slow

I was told today not to waste my money on my LT1, just sell the car for what i can and buy an LS1 car... are LT1s really that bad? or just under estimated and people just dont know how to builkd one
Old 08-25-2009, 08:45 PM
  #15  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (12)
 
1badzee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SFL
Posts: 3,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 96blackz28
hehe.. he was talking about his lil 408.


I just got back from the strip by my house, a Turbo 02 Trans am was running 9.3 at 151mph... i was quite impressed. LT1s r slow

I was told today not to waste my money on my LT1, just sell the car for what i can and buy an LS1 car... are LT1s really that bad? or just under estimated and people just dont know how to builkd one
Last sentence was on the money
Old 08-25-2009, 08:49 PM
  #16  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
96blackz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Centreville, VA
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1badzee
Last sentence was on the money
Yea, there was a bunch of Camaros and Trans Ams there tonight, i didnt run my car, not yet.. waiting till last of the season so when I blow the rearend I wont care since winter will be coming.

Anyway, yea this dude was BSing me telling me how shitty LT1s are and how a Head/Cam LT1 still cant beat a stock LS1... really? i doubt that

I hope sometime over the winter to start my build thread, I already have a seperate block waiting to get bored out.
Old 08-25-2009, 08:51 PM
  #17  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (5)
 
94LTZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 750
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

LOL i love how the LT1 is trashed talked lol, my little set up has suprised alot of people around here and it takes alot to walk around my lil LT lol
Old 08-25-2009, 08:53 PM
  #18  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (12)
 
1badzee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SFL
Posts: 3,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

lol I've seen stock LT1s beat stock LS1 and vice versa. You should have punched that guy in the neck.
Old 08-25-2009, 08:57 PM
  #19  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
96blackz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Centreville, VA
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yea.. i shoulda, i called bullshit on him. But LT1s do get trashed.. hard. Oh well man, you will have that i geus
Old 08-25-2009, 09:19 PM
  #20  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (88)
 
the_merv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: The Beach...
Posts: 19,260
Received 58 Likes on 51 Posts

Default

Yea the LT1's get hated on alot.. too many people out there cocky with the LS1 stuff.

I know I got one but I built it to smack around the cocky LS1 turds..


Originally Posted by SS RRR
Your what?
My ****..

What do you think I'm talking about when he asked about my Engine?


Quick Reply: How sweet would a 434 SBC LT1 BE?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:40 AM.