LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

whats better T-56 with 373's or 410's?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-13-2010, 12:32 PM
  #21  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
gregrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 6,000+ feet
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

You're just brilliant aren't you.
Old 04-13-2010, 01:24 PM
  #22  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
 
collier341's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Old 04-13-2010, 01:48 PM
  #23  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (15)
 
MasterTomos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Northeast Iowa
Posts: 3,508
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by zlicious94
So do you have to get a tune after getting 4.10's having an m6?
for functionality no, but if you want your speedo to be correct yes
Old 04-13-2010, 01:51 PM
  #24  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
AChotrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 9,896
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I had the 3.73s in my old bolt on car. I was kinda pissed when I picked up the car with 3.73s. I thought there would be a huge difference from stock & there wasnt. At the track it barely made a difference. I agree a 3.90 would be a much better option over the 3.73 but still not enough for me.
Old 04-13-2010, 03:13 PM
  #25  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
gregrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 6,000+ feet
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

4.10s ate nice for the track ill agree w that but eventually they WILL break. And on the street traction is limited a lot in first.

3.90s are stronger and help me keep the car hooked up much easier on the street.

Of course I'm not smart enough to start off in 2nd when drag racing like genius boy up here. He must have one hell of a clutch
Old 04-13-2010, 03:37 PM
  #26  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
 
collier341's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gregrob
Both of you have quite radically different setups than a bolt on car.

Depending on the cam / head specs, yes 4.10's and lower is what the car wants.

A bolt on car simply doesn't need it and a cam with lots of tq in the low rpms just makes first gear useless on the street with 4.10's.
I was running my 4.10's on bolt on only settup.

If first is too short for the street, then start in second.

Who's the genius boy now?? Learn how to read troll.
Old 04-13-2010, 03:40 PM
  #27  
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
garage_queen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Lakeland
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

just to be a little more specific. If you have a 93 with the t56 or if you happen to have gotten a 93 tranny somehow, 1st and 3rd gear are different than any later year. Putting 4.10s behind that tranny gearing makes 1st gear just about useless and would be better suited to 3.73s

looks like you've got a 95 so 4.10s will be fine until they break, which won't be long if you put a sticky tire on it.
Old 04-13-2010, 04:03 PM
  #28  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (26)
 
1961ba427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Milledgeville, GA
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Why does everyone keep saying 4.10's will break? I know that our lil ten bolts are weak in general, but why would a 4.10 break so much easier than a 3.90:1 or whatever ratio?
Old 04-13-2010, 04:11 PM
  #29  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
zlicious94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Troutdale,OR
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by MasterTomos
for functionality no, but if you want your speedo to be correct yes
Thanks! So how far off will my speedo be going from 3.42 to 4.10's?
Old 04-13-2010, 05:41 PM
  #30  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
gregrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 6,000+ feet
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by collier341
Who's the genius boy now?? Learn how to read troll.
You lose again ******. 1 I was referring to traction with street tires / on the street. 2 if you race someone from a dig whether its on the street or not and you try to start in 2nd you're ******* retarded.
Old 04-13-2010, 05:43 PM
  #31  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
gregrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 6,000+ feet
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1961ba427
Why does everyone keep saying 4.10's will break? I know that our lil ten bolts are weak in general, but why would a 4.10 break so much easier than a 3.90:1 or whatever ratio?
Less teeth = stronger, especially the pinion....
Old 04-13-2010, 05:47 PM
  #32  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Z28Roxy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Waukesha, WI
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 20 Posts

Default

Don't waste time and money on the 10 bolt. Bite the bullet and get a Dana 60, Ford 9", or 12 bolt. Then you can pick any gear you want and not have to worry about them breaking.

I love my 4.10s but after the blower goes on I think I'm going to have to go down to 3.54s
Old 04-13-2010, 05:53 PM
  #33  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (26)
 
1961ba427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Milledgeville, GA
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gregrob
Less teeth = stronger, especially the pinion....
Okay, that makes sense, but I didn't realize that these things were that bad that we had to worry about gear teeth count. I thought it was merely overall ring gear diameter/pinion diameter that was the culprit. I guess it all adds up when you have such a small rear. FWIW.....my 61 came stock with a 8.2" drop out center (like a 9") ten bolt that had 17 spline pinion AND 17 spline axles. (large splines on axles). I abused one for years behind a 468 BBC and a stall. Was 4.88:1 on a factory posi. I never had a problem despite EVERYONE familiar with them saying it was gonna blow. I eventually swapped to a 12 bolt, but the old rearend is still good. I've actually thought about swapping one of those into an F-body before. (I have several laying around.) Would be easy to weld a torque arm mount to the housing, No C-clips, larger (marinally) ring gear. I wonder if it would be worth the trouble??
Old 04-13-2010, 06:06 PM
  #34  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
 
collier341's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Are you serious with the insults guy? How old are you??

And when did I ever say to start out in second gear when racing? I said you can start in second when on the street if you wanted to.

I was running my 4.10's on bolt on only settup.

If first is too short for the street, then start in second.
There ya go bud. Maybe now you can see what I'm saying.
Old 04-13-2010, 06:22 PM
  #35  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
gregrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 6,000+ feet
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

The problem is you can not comprehend what I'm saying. I was referring to the lack of TRACTION in first gear when racing / driving spirited ON THE STREET. Suggesting someone start out in second to remedy that is ludicrous.
Old 04-13-2010, 06:53 PM
  #36  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
 
collier341's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't know then. All us guys running 4.10's must just be ludicrous then.

And if I'm not mistaken wasn't there a "SGS" or second gear start option offered on a lot of cars in the mid 90's that was used to remedy a loss of traction??

All those GM engineers are probably ludicrous as well.
Old 04-13-2010, 07:15 PM
  #37  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
gregrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 6,000+ feet
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Yeah dude, you're right. Everyone should start in second gear.

Hell I'll think I'll throw a set of 5.13's in and start in 3rd....
Old 04-13-2010, 07:43 PM
  #38  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
 
collier341's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Eh.. The only problem I see with that is, those 5.31's WILL break
Old 04-13-2010, 07:49 PM
  #39  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
draggin97s10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

you guys(gregbob) need to relax you guys are just bickering. For whoever started the post. if you go 410s which i would undoubtabley over 373s make sure you get a GM set. they are much stronger then a set of the cheapies. not saying they wont break cause im sure someone will chime in with a smartass comment. cause they will. make sure to use a new crosspin and c clips when changing them. and if you have the whole axle out for some reason. weld the axle tubes to the housing. dont forget the housing is cast and will need to be heated up with a torch before welding for good penetration. of couse all of that is not neccesary but added insurance in my mind
Old 04-13-2010, 08:30 PM
  #40  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
Wicked94Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Spokane, Wa
Posts: 3,725
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by zlicious94
Thanks! So how far off will my speedo be going from 3.42 to 4.10's?
that's a pretty simple mathematical equation dude.

if you want to go fast it's 4.10s and shorter, want to make excuses for yourself go with something steeper.


Quick Reply: whats better T-56 with 373's or 410's?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:20 AM.