LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Best stall for stock lt1 and a 125 shot

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-26-2013, 04:36 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
ballas03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: atco
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Best stall for stock lt1 and a 125 shot

Hi I was wondering if anyone could recommend a good stall speed for my car. I have a stock 96 z28 with a 125 shot of nitrous. the rear end gears are 2.73. I was think about a 2400 stall but people I know are telling me I am wasting my time. My question is should I go bigger then 2400. the biggest I want to go is 2800. also could anyone tell me how bad a converter will hurt my drivability like fuel mileage and comfort. thank you.
Old 08-26-2013, 05:33 PM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
itSSlowZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: North Augusta, SC
Posts: 515
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i'll let the pros give the specifics, but from experience, i had a 3200 stall and wished i'd gone bigger. a yank ss3600 comes highly recommended. it won't hurt you're cty mpg very much and as long as it locks up you're hwy mpg won't change. gears would definitely help too, but will obviously affect your mpg more
Old 08-26-2013, 05:33 PM
  #3  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
 
IDriveChevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Pasadena, Maryland
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have a 3600 in my car with just bolt ons and it drives pretty much normal. Once the converter locks up the car will drive like normal.
Old 08-26-2013, 05:39 PM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Dave357LT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

3600-3800. I had a vig 4400 and it drove fine. A little loose tho for a stock engine tho. I go yank 3800 if i did it again
Old 08-26-2013, 05:49 PM
  #5  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

2400 is going to be a stock size converter and the nitrous will push that stall higher and make it less efficient.

You are going to want a good 9.5" unit which is going to be bare minimum 2800stall and 3200 more likely. You will want to stay on the tight side so 3000-3200. If that worries you heat or driveability wise then you need to stop thinking like it is still the 80s.

You need to go with a quality unit too Yank, Edge, Vig, NOT some $400 TCI or ebay unit
Old 08-26-2013, 05:58 PM
  #6  
Moderator
iTrader: (33)
 
BizZzatch350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: T E X A S
Posts: 9,787
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

I had a Vigi 3200 for close to 7 years, daily drove for a while of that as well. Never had an issue, car drove great and was pretty fun. I actually miss it some times.
Old 08-26-2013, 06:01 PM
  #7  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
ballas03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: atco
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I understand highway mileage wont change but how bad will city be. so if I go with a 2800 stall or 3000 stall how much should I expect to drop my 1/4 mile time. my best is 12.6 with a 2.0 60ft. if a converter will drop me 3 tenths at lest I will do it. a few weeks ago I put 3.42 gears in and my times didn't change at all and my fuel mileage drop a lot. so this weekend I am putting the 2.73 back in. being an 18 year old kid I don't wont to waste the money again and not have anything happen.
Old 08-26-2013, 06:07 PM
  #8  
Moderator
iTrader: (33)
 
BizZzatch350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: T E X A S
Posts: 9,787
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

With that Vigi 3200 on Kumho street tires I would cut 1.7s with good track prep, that was with 3.23 gears in my bolt on LT1. .3-.5 tenths isn't uncommon, for an auto it's the best bang for the buck. I drove my 93 through Houston traffic when I was in college, mixed city/freeway MPG was always around 17. I drove it kinda rough also because I was a bit younger. But around town, it drove fine. Mine wasn't a lock up converter.
Old 08-26-2013, 06:52 PM
  #9  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ballas03
I understand highway mileage wont change but how bad will city be. so if I go with a 2800 stall or 3000 stall how much should I expect to drop my 1/4 mile time. my best is 12.6 with a 2.0 60ft. if a converter will drop me 3 tenths at lest I will do it. a few weeks ago I put 3.42 gears in and my times didn't change at all and my fuel mileage drop a lot. so this weekend I am putting the 2.73 back in. being an 18 year old kid I don't wont to waste the money again and not have anything happen.

If you think 2.73s are better then 3.42s then just walk away and buy a Prius.

If you think 3.42s hurt mileage much less hurt it meaningfully you either did something wrong, drove it a LOT harder or just can't evaluate things competently.

A bolton??? car doing 12.6 is respectable and if you are so foolish as to think 2.73s and 2400 stall is anything but a joke then I can't believe you made the car do that in the quarter.

Even for the most conservative among us 3.42/2800stall is awesome for a daily driver been there done that when the car was seeing 20K miles a year.

When I was in my early 20s I was afraid of gear and stall, then I got a clue.
Old 08-26-2013, 07:07 PM
  #10  
Launching!
iTrader: (15)
 
muddyjimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Was the car tuned after the 3.42 gears? If not that could make a big difference in the calculations you were using for mileage.

I would stick with at least the 3.42 gears and pick up a Yank SS3600 stall. Have a good tune done afterwards and that will really wake the car up. For a bolt on car with factory converter and 2.73 gears to run 12.6 is pretty good. Finish up the rest of the combination and you could have a strong running bolt on car. Sounds like it is time to bring it out to the LTx Shootout and run the Street Stock class.
Old 08-26-2013, 07:46 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
 
lt1-xjs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: centerville, ohio
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by muddyjimmy
Was the car tuned after the 3.42 gears? If not that could make a big difference in the calculations you were using for mileage.

I would stick with at least the 3.42 gears and pick up a Yank SS3600 stall. Have a good tune done afterwards and that will really wake the car up. For a bolt on car with factory converter and 2.73 gears to run 12.6 is pretty good. Finish up the rest of the combination and you could have a strong running bolt on car. Sounds like it is time to bring it out to the LTx Shootout and run the Street Stock class.
The 12.6 is a stock car with a 125 shot.
Old 08-26-2013, 08:16 PM
  #12  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
ballas03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: atco
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

thanks everybody for the input I think I am going to look at a 3000 stall.
Old 08-26-2013, 09:26 PM
  #13  
Launching!
iTrader: (15)
 
muddyjimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lt1-xjs
The 12.6 is a stock car with a 125 shot.
That must be the part that didn't sink in when I read it. Either way, my recommendations of at least 3.42 gears and an SS3600 stall still stands
Old 08-27-2013, 01:00 PM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
bowtienut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bright, IN
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

A Yank PAS3400 will be perfect for you. Yes, that's PAS (Power Adder Series). It's basically an SS3600 with a modified stator, flashes like an SS3600 but then couples up quicker for less "slippage" beyond flash stall rpm.
Perfect for the juice on a stock motor.
I would change those gears to at least 3.42 no matter what you do for a TC.
Old 08-27-2013, 01:24 PM
  #15  
TECH Enthusiast
 
ZFreie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ballas03
a few weeks ago I put 3.42 gears in and my times didn't change at all and my fuel mileage drop a lot. so this weekend I am putting the 2.73 back in. being an 18 year old kid I don't wont to waste the money again and not have anything happen.
Things were not equal in the comparisons between the runs then.

I just went from 2.73s to 3.42s and I can tell you I'm faster then I was before, cars I would run even with I now pull half a car, don't have before and after track results to compare sadly.

Also I've lost 1mpg from the gear switch, went from 22 mixed driving to 21 and I'm boltons, tune and !weight and I drive the **** out of my car.
Old 08-29-2013, 06:20 PM
  #16  
Teching In
 
Shanle929's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've read this figuring out the same. So yank3600 stall and 3.42 gears sounds good. My question is what is the lockup I read about and what is the driving experience like? Thanks in advance
Old 08-30-2013, 12:13 PM
  #17  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
 
IDriveChevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Pasadena, Maryland
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Lock up is basically a mechanical coupling to remove the slippage. My converter locks up at 45 mph and drives like a stock stall
Old 08-30-2013, 03:09 PM
  #18  
TECH Enthusiast
 
chevy94c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mass
Posts: 625
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Go with 3400 or above stall. vigilante or yank

Tranny cooler is also a good idea.
Old 08-30-2013, 04:03 PM
  #19  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

The stock converter is lockup, and lockup conditions are computer controlled and adjustable.

The "need" for vast amounts of extra tranny cooling is generally overstated as modern quality torque converters really don't generate that much heat not like stuff did 30 years ago. This tranny can actually be run too cold pretty easily. If you can keep the tranny between say 165 and 190 you are doing very well, I wouldn't even worry if it hits 200 sometimes.

Consider that the popular mods of turning down the fan temps and 160 stat both help keep the tranny cooler due to the in radiator cooler.
Old 08-30-2013, 06:05 PM
  #20  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
bowtienut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bright, IN
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
...The "need" for vast amounts of extra tranny cooling is generally overstated as modern quality torque converters really don't generate that much heat .....
True, but considering it's an F-body (which I believe OEM is radiator end tank trans cooling only), I'd add a cooler like we have on the B-bodies, especially if he intends to AutoX, roadrace, or generally beat on it.
I recently took a long trip in my Dad's 2010 Silverado. Periodically checked the trans temp via the OEM readout, and the peak I saw was 124 DegF! If GM thinks that's warm enough for longevity, I don't think we have to worry about too cool!


Quick Reply: Best stall for stock lt1 and a 125 shot



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:38 PM.