Stock stangs are slow
so i was driving a little hard. Came up on a red light and i slowed to about 5 as a ~2004 gt mustang came up and took off and got about a 2 car lead on me till i pushed on the gas. I quickly cought up and passed in 2nd and then slowly pulled on him to about 135.
if a ten year older car with 100K miles more than me outran me like i did him id role my car off a cliff.
Later that night another older mustang like an early 70's was trying to race me. And i think they had fairly large engine but the dudes were crack heads and i smoke em.
Any one know any times on a stock - mildly moded 4.6 stang is?
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
just off subject https://ls1tech.com/forums/newreply....e=1&p=5357833#
Offtopic, my cousin has a 89 mustang gt and swears that he can spank my z. now these stangs came with 205 horsepower stock at the motor. hes done some basic boltons and its a 5 speed but for him to say that his modded stang can beat my cai z is just dumb i cant wait till i take him to the track.
so back on subject yah the new mustangs are way overrated in my opinion.
just my 2 cents
unless you're at altitude you must live with a bunch of retards. 99-04 GTs are low 14 second cars on average.
A buddy of mine ran a 14.7 with a bone stock auto 98 GT, a non-pi 4.6L
Watch out for 30-05 Cobras. Those are wicked fast and will destroy even modified f-bodys. The reason you beat him is Ford traditionally has always had less HP and has always been playing catch up. Ten years has nothing to do with it, its apples and oranges when it comes to HP for those two cars.

All my buddies have 4.6 GTs and they run low 14s all day.....My one buddy has a manual with just a thermostat and catback...runs 13.9s all day
Last edited by undercoverz-28; Aug 15, 2006 at 05:50 PM.
Last edited by Adam_346; Aug 17, 2006 at 06:52 AM.









