LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

What year LT1 is the best?

Old 01-26-2008, 08:46 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
UNmolestedTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default What year LT1 is the best?

I have a good line on getting 1997 trans am for cheap. I plan on taking the LT1 and six speed and planting that into my 67 camaro. As far as modding goes are there any LT1 model years that are better to get or all they all the same? Also, I plan on turning it into a 383 with all forged internals to either run a supercharger or nitrous. What basic things do I need to look at before starting my build up that are specific to LT1's? Thanks.
Old 01-26-2008, 09:31 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
blk97z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 1,801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I would say get a 1997 b/c it is the last year they made it and b/c they should have "most of the flaws" fixed by then fromt he pervious years. It also has the most flywheel horsepower of any year of the LT1 and the most flywheel torque of any year. The six speeds will be higher on those two things, also the ss air setup and the ram air setup are a little more as well. Then you get the LT4 ss's and those are evern more hope this helps ya.

Later,
Devin
Old 01-26-2008, 10:09 PM
  #3  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (10)
 
Revelation Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Rialto CA
Posts: 4,770
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

94!

we have both MAF and SD, and hardened pushrods, pink rods which are a hair stronger than Powdered metal, we have the heads which are sort of the best for porting(more material), easier to align opti, OBDI is both ways good and bad.

me and blk97z28 are biased on years lol.
Old 01-26-2008, 10:16 PM
  #4  
TECH Resident
 
donkey mule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Panama City Florida
Posts: 934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

95 is the best year, vented opti plus better tuning capabilities.
Old 01-26-2008, 10:18 PM
  #5  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (10)
 
Revelation Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Rialto CA
Posts: 4,770
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i wish i could use HP tuners
Old 01-26-2008, 10:20 PM
  #6  
10 Second Club
 
C Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

1995 for the above reason... vented Opti but still OBD1.
Old 01-26-2008, 10:26 PM
  #7  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
kahunaking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

93s are faster

But i would rather take a 95 for the vented opti and the ability to actualy tune it vs chips
Old 01-26-2008, 10:36 PM
  #8  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
1994Z28Lt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Elko MN
Posts: 833
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by blk97z28
I would say get a 1997 b/c it is the last year they made it and b/c they should have "most of the flaws" fixed by then fromt he pervious years. It also has the most flywheel horsepower of any year of the LT1 and the most flywheel torque of any year. The six speeds will be higher on those two things, also the ss air setup and the ram air setup are a little more as well. Then you get the LT4 ss's and those are evern more hope this helps ya.

Later,
Devin
pretty bold statements, we all know that most lt1's put down similar numbers from year to year no matter what they were "rated" at

also all the answers here will be biased like Revelation Z28
said. Some people like the 97's because of the newer interior which isn't a big deal to me, but to some people it is

Some people dont like the 94's because it doesn't have a vented opti (i solved that problem by getting a dynaspark)

lets face it everyone that posts in this thread is going to be biased towards their car
Old 01-26-2008, 10:41 PM
  #9  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (10)
 
Revelation Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Rialto CA
Posts: 4,770
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kahunaking
93s are faster

But i would rather take a 95 for the vented opti and the ability to actualy tune it vs chips
you can tune 94's. E-PROM started that model year.
Old 01-26-2008, 11:31 PM
  #10  
Moderator
iTrader: (33)
 
BizZzatch350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: T E X A S
Posts: 9,787
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

1995 for 3 simple reasons, tune ability, OBD-1 and it has the vented opti factor. No other years offer all three. 1993s are cool, I own one, but man the amount of crap thats different, some times can make it a major pain in the ***.
Old 01-26-2008, 11:52 PM
  #11  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (35)
 
Schweet97Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Danville PA
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i like my 97 for the simple fact of the interior being the same as the ls1's.
Old 01-26-2008, 11:53 PM
  #12  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (21)
 
koolaid_kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 3,023
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

First, I am not biased. It is not my fault that the 97s are the best.
But seriously, for what you are doing I would go with a 95, for the reasons stated above. Get a copy of TunerCat (relatively cheap) and go to town tuning it. OBDI is a PITA AFA finding fault codes (most scanners are OBDII) but the price and availability of TunerCat, and the ease of tuning OBDI cars, more than make up for it.
Old 01-27-2008, 12:21 AM
  #13  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (32)
 
Taubr Unit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,146
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

I vote '94's also!! But im bias! haha
Old 01-27-2008, 12:23 AM
  #14  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Formula350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

While I love my 93, and it is quick (I chipped mine though), I wish I had some of the newer things. I don't like MAF personally, why dunno, just another sensor to go out. I wish I had tuneable transmission and such, but oh well. So 94 or 95 gets my vote. I think 94 has better (more material) heads than 95 though, but the trade off is the vented opti.
Old 01-27-2008, 12:40 AM
  #15  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
socal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Lake Jackson TX, south of Houston
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by donkey mule
95 is the best year, vented opti plus better tuning capabilities.
Originally Posted by BizZzatch350
1995 for 3 simple reasons, tune ability, OBD-1 and it has the vented opti factor. No other years offer all three. 1993s are cool, I own one, but man the amount of crap thats different, some times can make it a major pain in the ***.
above, looking at it from the swap point of view, but if the 97 ta is cheap get it. the motors are all about the same just 93 was speed density only and had a prom type ecm, 94/95 obd1 w maf, 95 vented opti, 96/97 obd2 crank position sensor and a few other sensors
Old 01-27-2008, 01:37 AM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
zlover129's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Of the motors by themselves, it really makes little difference (other then 93's) You can always use any 95, 96, or 97 motor with the vented opti and just use a 95 computer. Or convert the others to the vented opti's and OBD1 computer. 94's had hardened pushrods, but whats another $100 or so with the project you're talking about. You're good to go with the 97...hell my car made great power
Old 01-27-2008, 01:57 AM
  #17  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
00WSik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Schweet97Z
i like my 97 for the simple fact of the interior being the same as the ls1's.
Whats different from the 96 and 97, isnt it just the gauges??
Old 01-27-2008, 01:57 AM
  #18  
Banned
 
DBEST369's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Schweet97Z
i like my 97 for the simple fact of the interior being the same as the ls1's.
haha i like that but also cuz of the LT4 or go with a 95 cuz every 95 is just sick but i might be biased too lol
Old 01-27-2008, 01:58 AM
  #19  
TECH Regular
 
caldercay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by UNmolestedTA
I have a good line on getting 1997 trans am for cheap. I plan on taking the LT1 and six speed and planting that into my 67 camaro. As far as modding goes are there any LT1 model years that are better to get or all they all the same? Also, I plan on turning it into a 383 with all forged internals to either run a supercharger or nitrous. What basic things do I need to look at before starting my build up that are specific to LT1's? Thanks.
Considering that you're going to completely rework the engine (plus blow or spray), it doesn't make much difference the year model. Go with whatever has the least financial burden.
Old 01-27-2008, 02:00 AM
  #20  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (10)
 
Revelation Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Rialto CA
Posts: 4,770
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

ill actually vote for a 4 bolt main vette longblock. it would be the best of any F body LT1 that is in non splayed form.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: What year LT1 is the best?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:12 AM.