93 myth?
I got my car because I like it, and it'll beat the competition. Not all that interested in beating brethren 
Had I known the differences between 93-95, I probably would've gotten a PCM car. But, I got what I got and while it needs some tlc, it's a fun car.
I got my car because I like it, and it'll beat the competition. Not all that interested in beating brethren 
Had I known the differences between 93-95, I probably would've gotten a PCM car. But, I got what I got and while it needs some tlc, it's a fun car.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Was anyone paying attention? Assuming its not just misinfo, apparently the 93 tranny had different gearing (at least some-maybe not all). That would easily explain how they seem a bit faster than the 94-97's. Add that to the fact that there's bound to be a few 'factory freaks' somehow achieving a few more ponies than the average car that rolled off the assembly line and there's your mystery solved. Lest we forget, we're ALL always dead honest about our cars being bone stock when we talk about racing and beating another car, right?!? hehe... riiiiiiiight.... 
Anyways, bottom line is LT1's are LT1's. Whether they have better tranny gear ratios, or 4 catalytic converters and 4 o2 sensors, they are still that good ol' 350cid small block with reverse cooling and an optispark distributor system
and now i have a cc306 and a properly running motor so i cant imagine what times im going to be running






.