New LS1 Owners - Newbie Tech Basic Technical Questions & Advice
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Most RWHP on stock cam, naturally aspirated...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-28-2008, 10:05 PM
  #21  
Launching!
iTrader: (6)
 
oberth1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Staten Island NY, East brunswick NJ
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

bolt ons. anything other than internals or heads. IE: intake manifold, TB , air lid ,MAF, headers + exhaust, bellows. I miss anything anyone?
Old 09-28-2008, 10:11 PM
  #22  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (71)
 
MrElectric03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,885
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by pdbq
So what are some track numbers and perhaps trap speeds with the stock cam?

In the 1/8th mile, I've seen 8.2 @ 88 mph on a stock cam N/A "stripper" yet full bolt on automatic Camaro Z28.

Very impressive for even a stock cam, stock sounding 600 rpm idle with only something like a 200/200 duration @ about a .500/.500 lift, 117 LSA... :thumbs:

Pretty wicked compared to a small block with a radical sounding 230/230 cam, .550/.550 lift, 111 LSA.

But the LS1 car also gets a ton better gas mileage.
8.2 is very possible, Krazy4 posted above hit 8.2 and he isnt near full bolt ons, just had some drag radials. If you want an example of a good bolt on car that is the best I have seen, no longtubes with stock manifolds,cats,y pipe and no weight reduction and that car moves. Alot has to do with driving being as its an M6 but Krazy4 is a damn good driver.
Old 09-28-2008, 10:14 PM
  #23  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (71)
 
MrElectric03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,885
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by oberth1
bolt ons. anything other than internals or heads. IE: intake manifold, TB , air lid ,MAF, headers + exhaust, bellows. I miss anything anyone?
Electric water pump, underdrive pulley, roller rockers(inside valve covers but moast still consider a bolt on)
Old 09-28-2008, 10:56 PM
  #24  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
conan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Back in the Burg
Posts: 6,492
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LivingCanvas
This is a pointless topic because every dyno is different. Then you have the whole weather/DA issue also skewing numbers.

Track numbers are where its at.
Track #'s can be skewed as well. Tire's, driver, A4,M6, track conditions, suspention, weight, weather... There are always variables... track or dyno.
Old 09-28-2008, 11:46 PM
  #25  
TECH Enthusiast
 
SOM02WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by conan
Track #'s can be skewed as well. Tire's, driver, A4,M6, track conditions, suspention, weight, weather... There are always variables... track or dyno.
Track numbers can't be skewed faster though. If you mess up you go slower. Dyno numbers can be skewed higher than they are. I mean you see full bolt on cars making on avg 350 or so through an M6. But then you have guys claiming the same HP with just a lid and catback?? Then there are dynos that have stock LS1's in the 330's or 340's. Its all in the dyno, to compare numbers you would all have to be on the same machine. Track numbers can't be faked to be faster anyway..
Old 09-28-2008, 11:53 PM
  #26  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
pdbq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lakeland, FL
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

For some reason the A4 could "beat" an M6 with similar mods, but the M6 would almost always dyno higher. It happens a lot with the LT1 F-body cars.

And manual Civics ALWAYS outrun their automatic counterparts. Hmmmm....
Old 09-29-2008, 12:23 AM
  #27  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
conan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Back in the Burg
Posts: 6,492
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SOM02WS6
Track numbers can't be skewed faster though. If you mess up you go slower. Dyno numbers can be skewed higher than they are. I mean you see full bolt on cars making on avg 350 or so through an M6. But then you have guys claiming the same HP with just a lid and catback?? Then there are dynos that have stock LS1's in the 330's or 340's. Its all in the dyno, to compare numbers you would all have to be on the same machine. Track numbers can't be faked to be faster anyway..
i never said they could be faked. and as far as guys making false hp claims you can always make fake time claims too. im not taking anything away from time slips just saying there are just as many variables on the track as on a dyno. Every ones set up is differant and the honest claims on this site are prety close comparison to each other.
Old 09-29-2008, 01:00 AM
  #28  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
krazy4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Yorba Linda, CA
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MrElectric03
8.2 is very possible, Krazy4 posted above hit 8.2 and he isnt near full bolt ons, just had some drag radials. If you want an example of a good bolt on car that is the best I have seen, no longtubes with stock manifolds,cats,y pipe and no weight reduction and that car moves. Alot has to do with driving being as its an M6 but Krazy4 is a damn good driver.
Thanks for all the compliments!
Old 09-29-2008, 01:07 AM
  #29  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
LivingCanvas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by pdbq
So what are some track numbers and perhaps trap speeds with the stock cam?

In the 1/8th mile, I've seen 8.2 @ 88 mph on a stock cam N/A "stripper" yet full bolt on automatic Camaro Z28.

Very impressive for even a stock cam, stock sounding 600 rpm idle with only something like a 200/200 duration @ about a .500/.500 lift, 117 LSA... :thumbs:

Pretty wicked compared to a small block with a radical sounding 230/230 cam, .550/.550 lift, 111 LSA.

But the LS1 car also gets a ton better gas mileage.
There is a list for quickest stock internals cars on here. I think you'll be very surprised. https://ls1tech.com/forums/drag-racing-results/993440-quickest-stock-internals-list-11-77-bump.html
Old 09-29-2008, 01:09 AM
  #30  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (39)
 
NVR_SPDS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,129
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Our car(02 WS.6 M6), with a good driver ran a 8.4@87 mph IIRC with just a lid, catback, and sportline springs on stock tires.
Old 09-29-2008, 01:19 AM
  #31  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
question's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Boomtown
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I did 360/370 with mods in sig.
Old 09-29-2008, 09:25 AM
  #32  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (30)
 
12secSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,690
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

One thing to point out is that although you may see a stock internals go 10.80s (like in that list), it doesn't mean most stock internals cars on the street will run that number. Those are extremely light weight race only setups. To get a proper analysis of ETs, you need to factor in weight in to the equation.
Old 09-29-2008, 11:17 AM
  #33  
TECH Senior Member
 
JD_AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: St.Charles MO
Posts: 5,801
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by pdbq
For some reason the A4 could "beat" an M6 with similar mods, but the M6 would almost always dyno higher. It happens a lot with the LT1 F-body cars.

And manual Civics ALWAYS outrun their automatic counterparts. Hmmmm....
Because of gearing and how what the transmission is made for. Civics are economy car, and the autos are built to get you to the grocery store and back, not drag racing. To top it off Civics are completely gutless in lower RPMs, where the autos will be launching at...
Old 09-29-2008, 11:32 AM
  #34  
TECH Apprentice
 
PowershifterNC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've seen plenty of cam only cars put out over 400 on the dyno..prolly all dynojet #'s though
Old 09-29-2008, 11:46 AM
  #35  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
Detoxx03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Woodward Avenue
Posts: 7,336
Received 72 Likes on 37 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by blackcamarob4c
SO what do you all consider FULL BOLT ONS??? no internal motor mods? no trans or rear mods??? just asking!!!
No internal mods is full bolt ons
Old 09-29-2008, 08:38 PM
  #36  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
LivingCanvas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 12secSS
One thing to point out is that although you may see a stock internals go 10.80s (like in that list), it doesn't mean most stock internals cars on the street will run that number. Those are extremely light weight race only setups. To get a proper analysis of ETs, you need to factor in weight in to the equation.
Yeah but look down the list. The cars running high 11's are pretty close to full weight.
Old 09-29-2008, 11:29 PM
  #37  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
rio95cobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 'Trust'
The bolt on record is about 380RWHP, but it costs a whole lot more to get there then it would to do H/C, and its only going to happen through an M6 w/a 10bolt and stock gears. Its more than just power mods, you need a light weight flywheel/clutch, carbon fiber driveshaft ($$$), light wheels, etc. etc.

If you're set on keeping the stock cam, someone made 380RWHP with very basic bolt ons and some AFR heads.


man please explain why making that power is only gonna happen through a 10bolt w/ stock gears? why on earth would that matter
Old 09-29-2008, 11:43 PM
  #38  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Speedmonster185's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Lafayette/West Lafayette, IN
Posts: 1,090
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Bigger gears and bigger rear ends both eat up some power.
Old 09-30-2008, 12:11 AM
  #39  
Teching In
iTrader: (10)
 
maverick0011's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Bremen KY
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I made 367 with a 228 cam. Since then i have added an ls6 intake,pulley,4.10's single chamber muffler and a ported throttle body. Havent had it back on the dyno but i hoping for 390 tuned.
Old 09-30-2008, 12:30 AM
  #40  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
rio95cobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Speedmonster185
Bigger gears and bigger rear ends both eat up some power.

do they really??? i dont understand that. how though? its just a rear end? and a gear swap?


Quick Reply: Most RWHP on stock cam, naturally aspirated...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:51 PM.