Northwest Members WA, OR, ID, MT, WY, SD, ND

Dyno the BMF Friday Nov 11 at Turbo Tech

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-10-2005, 06:42 PM
  #1  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
CHarris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Poulsbo, WA
Posts: 2,381
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Dyno the BMF Friday Nov 11 at Turbo Tech

I've got a 1 pm appointment for Friday the 11th at Turbo Tech. Don't know what it'll do, but I'll find out.

An interesting note is that LPE's 700 hp twin turbo 427 package in a H2 made 522 rwhp. That's some hellacious drivetrain loss
Old 11-10-2005, 07:16 PM
  #2  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
00Vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Southern Maryland
Posts: 3,576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CHarris
I've got a 1 pm appointment for Friday the 11th at Turbo Tech. Don't know what it'll do, but I'll find out.

An interesting note is that LPE's 700 hp twin turbo 427 package in a H2 made 522 rwhp. That's some hellacious drivetrain loss
Interesting............I wonder if I can make it. I'll try to be there! My car is still with Ellis, so I have to share my wifes car for now.
Old 11-11-2005, 10:02 PM
  #3  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
00Vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Southern Maryland
Posts: 3,576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

So what did it dyno? Inquiring minds want to know.........
Old 11-11-2005, 10:45 PM
  #4  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
CHarris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Poulsbo, WA
Posts: 2,381
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

http://www.highspeedproducts.com/video/BMF%20Dyno.wmv

Run #1: 378.43 HP and 418 TQ (@ 1:23pm)

Run #2: 358.57 HP and 438.00 TQ (@ 1:30pm)

Run #3: 387.40 HP and 460.00 TQ with a 50 wet shot (@ 1:35 pm)

Last edited by CHarris; 11-11-2005 at 11:16 PM.
Old 11-11-2005, 10:50 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
My1st Truck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: B-town
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Very cool Cory!
Old 11-11-2005, 10:54 PM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Robert56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 9,557
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Looks like your 50hp wet shot is really a 8.97rwhp shot. Something taint right my friend.
Robert

Last edited by Robert56; 11-12-2005 at 12:28 AM.
Old 11-11-2005, 11:00 PM
  #7  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
CHarris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Poulsbo, WA
Posts: 2,381
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Robert56
Looks like your 50hp wet shot is really a 8.97rwhp shot and a -20.69 on the torque. Something taint right my friend.
Robert
No.... heat soak and 30% drivetrain loss is all that's up....
Old 11-11-2005, 11:06 PM
  #8  
Pathological Modifier
iTrader: (11)
 
Ryan K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,626
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Hey Cory, your first pull is actually 417.8 TQ

That run was a little funny with the converter lock/unlock at the begining ( I think ).

Still one Stout Truck, I think that side wall flex that I zoomed in on the last pull robs a bit of HP.

Last edited by Ryan K; 11-11-2005 at 11:29 PM.
Old 11-11-2005, 11:12 PM
  #9  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
CHarris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Poulsbo, WA
Posts: 2,381
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Ryan K
Hey Cory, your first pull is actually 417.8 TQ

That's what I get for reading the numbers off the bottom...
Old 11-11-2005, 11:29 PM
  #10  
Pathological Modifier
iTrader: (11)
 
Ryan K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,626
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I'll bet if you did a run with the converter locked you'd see a huge difference.
Old 11-11-2005, 11:39 PM
  #11  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
CHarris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Poulsbo, WA
Posts: 2,381
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Ryan K
I'll bet if you did a run with the converter locked you'd see a huge difference.

If I had a convertor I trusted it would be a done deal.... I can't wait to get the Yank in

Last edited by CHarris; 11-12-2005 at 12:07 AM.
Old 11-11-2005, 11:43 PM
  #12  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
TwoFast4Lv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: LT1 land...the "409" of the 90s!
Posts: 10,023
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CHarris
If I had a converotr I trusted it would be a done deal.... I can't wait to get the Yank in
I can't wait to cut that thing open! we built it for a little Camaro!
Old 11-12-2005, 12:08 AM
  #13  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
CHarris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Poulsbo, WA
Posts: 2,381
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by TwoFast4Lv
I can't wait to cut that thing open! we built it for a little Camaro!

Seemed like a good idea at the time... I think the N2O really did it in though... LOL
Old 11-12-2005, 12:09 AM
  #14  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
00Vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Southern Maryland
Posts: 3,576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CHarris
http://www.highspeedproducts.com/video/BMF%20Dyno.wmv

Run #1: 378.43 HP and 418 TQ (@ 1:23pm)

Run #2: 358.57 HP and 438.00 TQ (@ 1:30pm)

Run #3: 387.40 HP and 460.00 TQ with a 50 wet shot (@ 1:35 pm)

Man......with the times that beast is producing, I would have thought you would put down may north of those numbers. Don't get me wrong here, those are great numbers. Especially the torque! I guess I thought it would take a lot more power than that to propel your beast to the ET's you got.
Old 11-12-2005, 12:12 AM
  #15  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
CHarris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Poulsbo, WA
Posts: 2,381
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 00Vette
Man......with the times that beast is producing, I would have thought you would put down may north of those numbers. Don't get me wrong here, those are great numbers. Especially the torque! I guess I thought it would take a lot more power than that to propel your beast to the ET's you got.

It apparently only takes about 550 engine hp.
Old 11-12-2005, 12:12 AM
  #16  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
CHarris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Poulsbo, WA
Posts: 2,381
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Did anyone notice anything odd about the tires on the end of the video?

Anyone? Bueller?
Old 11-12-2005, 12:16 AM
  #17  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
00Vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Southern Maryland
Posts: 3,576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CHarris
Did anyone notice anything odd about the tires on the end of the video?

Anyone? Bueller?
I don't know if that is the camera or what, but it looks like 2 different parts (right behind where the tire meets the drum) that its buckling/flexing pretty severely! I'd say your getting robbed of HP. I'm no expert though
Old 11-12-2005, 12:22 AM
  #18  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
CHarris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Poulsbo, WA
Posts: 2,381
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 00Vette
I don't know if that is the camera or what, but it looks like 2 different parts (right behind where the tire meets the drum) that its buckling/flexing pretty severely! I'd say your getting robbed of HP. I'm no expert though

It IS wrinkled! And I had the tires at regular full pressure.
Old 11-12-2005, 12:26 AM
  #19  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Robert56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 9,557
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by CHarris
No.... heat soak and 30% drivetrain loss is all that's up....
no that's not correct, you allready used your drivetrain loss in your N/a pull, now if you want a 50rwhp shot, you'll have to jet for a 50 rwhp shot. every motor is different, and just cause a company says this is our 50hp jetting, ti doesn'r mean that'll be what you get. Ok lets throw some heat soak in, still you should not lose 42hp from a n2o shot as it's cold very cold. Even the second run to last run shows only 29hp. Or am I really missing something here? This is a constant arguement in the n2o section, I am running the 100hp jets but I only get 62hp, simple answer, jet to the rear wheels what you want. Some cars actually get more than stated. It's all about mods and volumetric efficiancy. Do you have engine temps for each run? Not trying to bust your *****, but rather to make you faster.
Robert
Old 11-12-2005, 12:39 AM
  #20  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
CHarris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Poulsbo, WA
Posts: 2,381
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Robert56
no that's not correct, you allready used your drivetrain loss in your N/a pull, now if you want a 50rwhp shot, you'll have to jet for a 50 rwhp shot. every motor is different, and just cause a company says this is our 50hp jetting, ti doesn'r mean that'll be what you get. Ok lets throw some heat soak in, still you should not lose 42hp from a n2o shot as it's cold very cold. Even the second run to last run shows only 29hp. Or am I really missing something here? This is a constant arguement in the n2o section, I am running the 100hp jets but I only get 62hp, simple answer, jet to the rear wheels what you want. Some cars actually get more than stated. It's all about mods and volumetric efficiancy. Do you have engine temps for each run? Not trying to bust your *****, but rather to make you faster.
Robert

Oh... hell... what do I know... I've only been able to get my truck from the 17.5 range down to 13.85.


Quick Reply: Dyno the BMF Friday Nov 11 at Turbo Tech



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:54 AM.