WTB: Volant CAI for 98-02' Trans Am
12-22-2005, 12:08 PM
#1
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (61)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 2,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
WTB: Volant CAI for 98-02' Trans Am Looking to get a Volant CAI for 98-02' Trans Am, prefer new but will consider used in good shape...
If ya got one available post up here or email me at jay442@msn.com
-Jay-
If ya got one available post up here or email me at jay442@msn.com
-Jay-
12-22-2005, 12:29 PM
#3
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (61)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 2,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I saw that the Camaro version has the one large oval filter vs. the (2) cone style for the T/A - figured they did it that way on the T/A version to pick up from each opening in the hood (after you remove the baffles of course).
Actually, (2) of the cone style filters should flow better than (1) single due to increased surface area - didn't hear about the turbulance problem though?
Is the airbox itself exactly the same between the two versions? Don't want to run into any problems with it sealing to the underhood contours...
Actually, (2) of the cone style filters should flow better than (1) single due to increased surface area - didn't hear about the turbulance problem though?
Is the airbox itself exactly the same between the two versions? Don't want to run into any problems with it sealing to the underhood contours...
12-28-2005, 05:25 PM
#6
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Orange Park/ Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1QUIKWS6
I saw that the Camaro version has the one large oval filter vs. the (2) cone style for the T/A - figured they did it that way on the T/A version to pick up from each opening in the hood (after you remove the baffles of course).
Actually, (2) of the cone style filters should flow better than (1) single due to increased surface area - didn't hear about the turbulance problem though?
Is the airbox itself exactly the same between the two versions? Don't want to run into any problems with it sealing to the underhood contours...
Actually, (2) of the cone style filters should flow better than (1) single due to increased surface area - didn't hear about the turbulance problem though?
Is the airbox itself exactly the same between the two versions? Don't want to run into any problems with it sealing to the underhood contours...
