Cam'd LS3 help I bought a 2008 C6 with a mild cam (228/232/598/600/113), CAI, LT's and tune. I have had a really bad surging problem since I have had the car, really bad. Bucking and surging under light load. I replaced the original Callaway Honker (known to cause some LS3 maf turbulence) and replaced it with an LS3 C6 Airaid. That took care of about 85% of the surging. I installed a set of TSP 1 7/8 LT's w/o cats and I ported the intake knowing I was going to get a retune. Yesterday at Diablosport, Johan retuned the car and it made 475rwhp (untouched as I got there) and the fuel was way off everywhere. After adjustments it ended up @ 485rwhp on a stingy load bearing dyno, on a Dynojet it would have been even better. Seeing the fuel off so much we didn't bother "street" tuning the surging out since a small test drive in 1st and 2nd it seemed to resolve it. After jumping on the interstate on the way home I noticed the surging is still there and it is mainly noticable in 3rd and really noticeable in 4th @ 2K. It almost feels like a plug missing though that's not the case. Plugs are new and gapped @ .40 (FYI). I am (not so) sure it's MAF related since just changing the CAI made such a huge difference. Can anyone offer advice for us to try on the next tune? Any help would be appreciated. Any adjustments to the maf table or something? I am trying to do some homework so we don't waste too much time. Complete mod list 2008 M6 1LT TSP Off road 1 7/8's 3x3 228/232/598/600/113 cam Dual Valve springs Airaid CAI Ported TB Ported LS3 intake UD pulley New GM LS3 maf (installed it before the dyno, same exact symtoms) Thanks, Jason http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f2...3_m6_jason.jpg |
Hmmm, little help over here. :nod: |
Seeing the fuel off so much we didn't bother "street" tuning the surging out since a small test drive in 1st and 2nd it seemed to resolve it. |
Originally Posted by 69LT1Bird
(Post 12645677)
There is your problem. Get a full tune, not just a dyno tune. You need the VE and MAF tuned at all of the normal driving conditons, not just WOT. You paid for a tune, get a tune. Your cam isn't big enough to do it. |
PM sent. A 228/232 cam should be fine. A common cause of bucking and surging is too much timing. Data log while the car is in the "bucking surging zone". Via the data logs determine at what RPM and at what cylinder airmass (g/sec) cylinder the bucking/surging occurs. Then find the corresponding area in your Main Spark / High Octane table and try lowering the timing. As a test try lowering it by 5-10 degrees to see if it makes a difference. |
Originally Posted by MrDrezzUp
(Post 12645875)
PM sent. A 228/232 cam should be fine. A common cause of bucking and surging is too much timing. Data log while the car is in the "bucking surging zone". Via the data logs determine at what RPM and at what cylinder airmass (g/sec) cylinder the bucking/surging occurs. Then find the corresponding area in your Main Spark / High Octane table and try lowering the timing. As a test try lowering it by 5-10 degrees to see if it makes a difference. |
Originally Posted by MrDrezzUp
(Post 12645875)
PM sent. A 228/232 cam should be fine. A common cause of bucking and surging is too much timing. Data log while the car is in the "bucking surging zone". Via the data logs determine at what RPM and at what cylinder airmass (g/sec) cylinder the bucking/surging occurs. Then find the corresponding area in your Main Spark / High Octane table and try lowering the timing. As a test try lowering it by 5-10 degrees to see if it makes a difference. Question- If there was too much timing, would plug gap affect it at all? They are at .40 now so would opening them or closing them affect that? Just curious. In other words, if I went out and gapped them at .50 today, would it affect it at all if it is timing? Tough call probably.? |
Which spark plug are you running? For your setup I would recommend the TR5 gapped @ 0.040". Regarding my earlier suggestion, it may be a good idea to switch the car to pure MAF mode. I realize this may seem a bit counter intuitive (because you are wondering if your MAF is possibly to blame) but if your car has been modded (which is has) your VE table will no longer be correct and will not be correct until the car is properly tuned. If you switch to pure MAF mode, (and assuming your MAF transfer function is correct) your fuel trims should then be pretty good, versus the VE fuel trims which (because of your mods) would be incorrect. |
Originally Posted by MrDrezzUp
(Post 12645957)
Which spark plug are you running? For your setup I would recommend the TR5 gapped @ 0.040". Regarding my earlier suggestion, it may be a good idea to switch the car to pure MAF mode. I realize this may seem a bit counter intuitive (because you are wondering if your MAF is possibly to blame) but if your car has been modded (which is has) your VE table will no longer be correct and will not be correct until the car is properly tuned. If you switch to pure MAF mode, (and assuming your MAF transfer function is correct) your fuel trims should then be pretty good, versus the VE fuel trims which (because of your mods) would be incorrect. I am going to forward all your advice, thank you. |
Originally Posted by 69LT1Bird
(Post 12645677)
There is your problem. Get a full tune, not just a dyno tune. You need the VE and MAF tuned at all of the normal driving conditons, not just WOT. You paid for a tune, get a tune. Your cam isn't big enough to do it. cheers |
The 08s are not like the 411 box cars, they do not have a VE.... They have coefficients. Coefficients are tough to grasp, but the PCMs are VERY fast. SD is not needed with this setup. I can get that cam to run well to 12-1300 with no issues. You can call me if you would like to discuss it over the phone. |
Bucking is most commonly (before timing that is, though all variables play a role) excessive airflow. Here is your hint; airflow final minimum ;) |
^^^Yeah, but with the E38s, even if the base airflow is dialed in, there's aggressive interaction between the timing tables that causes harsh bucking. It's evidenced by a saw tooth pattern in the timing in the data logs. There's some "trickery" to getting this out. There's some other tricks to making the E38s drive smooth, but that's all the secrets I'm willing to share today. Check with me tomorrow LOL. |
Originally Posted by JayplaySS2
(Post 12645782)
Agreed, I am only looking for advice for what direction to look into when we do look at it again. LS3 maf's are VERY sensitive. Thanks :nod: Also, as I stated before, make sure there's no harsh timing adjustments being made by the PCM. Make sure your timing line in your scanner looks steady. |
Originally Posted by Louis
(Post 12649054)
The 08s are not like the 411 box cars, they do not have a VE.... They have coefficients. Coefficients are tough to grasp, but the PCMs are VERY fast. SD is not needed with this setup. I can get that cam to run well to 12-1300 with no issues. You can call me if you would like to discuss it over the phone.
Originally Posted by Frost
(Post 12649150)
Bucking is most commonly (before timing that is, though all variables play a role) excessive airflow. Here is your hint; airflow final minimum ;)
Originally Posted by edcmat-l1
(Post 12649186)
^^^Yeah, but with the E38s, even if the base airflow is dialed in, there's aggressive interaction between the timing tables that causes harsh bucking. It's evidenced by a saw tooth pattern in the timing in the data logs. There's some "trickery" to getting this out. There's some other tricks to making the E38s drive smooth, but that's all the secrets I'm willing to share today. Check with me tomorrow LOL. |
Originally Posted by Frost
(Post 12649150)
Bucking is most commonly (before timing that is, though all variables play a role) excessive airflow. Here is your hint; airflow final minimum ;)
Originally Posted by edcmat-l1
(Post 12649186)
^^^Yeah, but with the E38s, even if the base airflow is dialed in, there's aggressive interaction between the timing tables that causes harsh bucking. It's evidenced by a saw tooth pattern in the timing in the data logs. There's some "trickery" to getting this out. How do you normally get it to iron out? Fuel. How do you add more fuel with out the trims taking it back away? Thats the question of the day :D |
Originally Posted by Louis
(Post 12649660)
How do you normally get it to iron out? Fuel. How do you add more fuel with out the trims taking it back away? Thats the question of the day :D That's top secret chit right there. I could tell you, but I'd have to keel you! Texas is a long way to drive for dat! |
Stop by Richmond on the way to TX and have a beer or so :) If the items mentioned in the thread are logged and the event time is noted, you should be able to see where to attribute it in the log. |
Its real simple, and the problem only gets worse the bigger the cam is :D |
As mentioned by the masters above, timing is really a small part of the problem. The bigger problem is getting your running airflow correct (it never is right after a cam swap) and get the fueling right (this requires revising the VE coefficients and rescaling the MAF tables). First, you must get the airflow tables right because if you don't address these, you'll be chasing your tail with the fueling and timing tables. The ported TB is not doing you any favors here by the way. When in doubt, err on the side of being a little rich in your transitional fueling. This takes a lot of the stumble out of the system as you go from light to heavier load. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:51 PM. |
© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands