VE tuning. I've got a problem Ok to start off I have a 98 with this is what I've got. Stage 2 Heads CC 212 218 523 529 @ 114 Cam LS6 Intake Lid and K&N PACE LS1 calibrated LS6 MAF MAC Headers ORP NGK TR6’s gapped at .40 No ERG removed w\ HP Tuners hope I did that right, I disabled and clear the ERG timing table No air tubes removed w\ HP Tuners So I went started with stock table. I unplugged the MAF and start logging. I came back decide to times the entire secondary table by 1.06. I got somewhere -2 to 0 on everything. So I times the Primary table by 1.06 and I plugged in the MAF and reset the DTC's and LTFT's and its worse it is logging about +5 to +8. So what did I do so wrong? Thanks in advance. Tom |
So the MAF disagrees with what you told it for SD. What was it doing before? Were you having positive trims on your previous tune? |
I might sound really stupid but what is "SD"? It was running +2 to +4 LTFT's until I went and messed it up. :D Tom |
"SD"=speed density. |
Well I logged after changing the MAF by 1.08 it looks a lot a lot better. Check it out. The only things that look bad are idle and deacceleration. http://www.ls1ta.com/hptuners/ltft.jpg Next question is will the final tweak be the MAF again or go back to the VE? If it is the MAF then how do I know which cells to modify? Thanks again Tom |
Nothing? |
I would get the speed density tune close to zero in all the cells, then when you plug the maf back do some logging. Export the data as a csv file and use excel to make a graph of ltrims vs. maf frequency. Then do a curve fit through the data and that will show you how off your maf is at each value for airflow. Either that or leave the maf off. |
Oh yeah, and before you make the graph delete all the lines with FTC 22 in them because the ltrims won't help you tune your maf for power enrichment. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:31 AM. |
© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands