Ugly looking start-up - What's the cure? 1 Attachment(s) My O2s go from real lean for 13 seconds to very rich for 25 seconds. During this whole time, it is adding lots of STIT (over 2 add some points). Then the O2s start to cycle a bit and all of a sudden the STIT starts falling fast. By the 1 minute mark, the STIT is .5 negative. By 176* it is telling me that it only wants 6.7 g/sec airflow which seems low. :bang: mods: heads, 228/224 113 cam, 1 7/8" headers, FAST 90mm TB I've reduced proportional fuel at idle and used the effective area to 48%. Car drives much better since those changes, but cold start up is much worse. HPT log attached TIA :) |
Joel, you probably need to go into Open Loop Fueling table (ECT vs. MAP) and lean it out in the tables that are giving you trouble. I copied an Ausie Table from a Holden that was speed density tuned. My open loop startups are much less stinky and a lot more smooth. |
I've done that in cold start-up area (MAP 45 - 60, 68* and below) where the multiplier gets real high, but haven't touched the warmer areas. This was a warm start-up since the ECT was about 100*. I also reduced the cranking VE by 8% since it was so much higher than my normal VE (which was reduced by double digits in that range). I also reduced the length of Afterstart Enrichment delay in the 68* - 133* range to lean out the start-up idle. Maybe the combination of the cranking adjustment & afterstart are too much and I've overly leaned it out? |
Where are your idle airflow tables? |
temp...RAF 32.....16.5 68.....13.5 104....11.7 140....10.8 176....8.5 212....7.5 I have raised them up a bit, maybe they should be lowered. The car is an M6 with an Al. flywheel The car is just really stumbling during start-up. Before the IAC effective area change, the car would fire up very nicely. |
I think changing the IAC effective area to 48% was a mistake. The IAC needs to be a lot more aggressive than that. Basically, when running a 90mm TB, you still want your curve to be fairly steep at first (to handle cold starts and a/c), but then flattening out more once you get past 100 count. I built my own table and it works well with the Nick Williams 90mm TB. If you're running a FAST or TPIS TB, you may need a different curve, but trust me, it will be closer to the stock table than it will 48% of it. |
Patrick : I tried 60% and that seems to work, but after reading Phil's post about the FAST 90mm TB, I went to 48%. I can put it back to 60% as the car still drove much better than stock. What do you do to build the IAC table? |
Originally Posted by Ragtop 99 What do you do to build the IAC table? IAC Effective area (IAC Steps) Square mm, Value 0.0 0 2.0 0 4.0 0 6.0 0 8.0 0.000000 10.0 0.000000 12.0 0.000000 14.0 0.000000 16.0 0.000000 18.0 0.000000 20.0 0.000000 22.0 0.000000 24.0 0.000000 26.0 0.000000 28.0 1.000000 30.0 15.000000 32.0 25.000000 34.0 50.000000 36.0 70.000000 38.0 90.000000 40.0 110.000000 42.0 125.000000 44.0 135.000000 46.0 140.000000 48.0 145.000000 50.0 150.000000 52.0 153.000000 54.0 156.000000 56.0 157.000000 58.0 158.000000 60.0 159.000000 62.0 161.000000 64.0 162.000000 66.0 163.000000 68.0 165.000000 70.0 167.000000 72.0 170.000000 74.0 173.000000 76.0 175.000000 78.0 178.000000 80.0 180.000000 82.0 181.000000 84.0 183.000000 86.0 183.000000 88.0 185.000000 90.0 187.000000 92.0 190.000000 94.0 194.000000 96.0 199.000000 98.0 205.000000 100.0 210.000000 102.0 215.000000 104.0 220.000000 106.0 227.000000 108.0 232.000000 110.0 238.000000 112.0 245.000000 114.0 252.000000 116.0 260.000000 118.0 264.000000 120.0 267.000000 Sorry for the vertical format. It's an EFI Live thing.;) |
Originally Posted by Ragtop 99 My O2s go from real lean for 13 seconds to very rich for 25 seconds. During this whole time, it is adding lots of STIT (over 2 add some points). Then the O2s start to cycle a bit and all of a sudden the STIT starts falling fast. By the 1 minute mark, the STIT is .5 negative. By 176* it is telling me that it only wants 6.7 g/sec airflow which seems low. :bang: mods: heads, 228/224 113 cam, 1 7/8" headers, FAST 90mm TB I've reduced proportional fuel at idle and used the effective area to 48%. Car drives much better since those changes, but cold start up is much worse. HPT log attached TIA :) I'd reduce the Cranking VE by the same % diff between your stock and New VE table. Helped mine alot...especially hot starts. I'm Open Loop/SD. FWIW. |
i had troubles starting, i changed a LOT! start up enrichemnt friction airflow olfa spark correction cranking ve effective area idle airflow those are the main thing i had to do to get it inline. you using hp tuners? if so send me your tune to budchevy358@yahoo.com and i can try to give you a hand. i fougth this for the longest time and this is the best solution i have. i dont know anyone else that had troulbes like i did but i went through a lot to set it up right so it woudl actually start lol. starts strong now and the high idle goes out a lot quicker. i like the way it fires up now |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:57 PM. |
© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands