Pontiac GTO 2004-2006 The Modern Goat

13.7 @ 106? wtf

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-09-2010, 08:42 PM
  #21  
Staging Lane
 
Super Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lake Jackson, Texas
Posts: 77
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Traction. With my stock, auto 06, I ran 13.0 at 106, so you've got the mph to do it, and I managed that on the 235 series that the 18s come with. BTW, the week before, my PB had been 13.7 as well.
Old 03-09-2010, 08:45 PM
  #22  
TECH Resident
 
06 6.0 GTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wouldnt believe me if i told you
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Other then custom made "hardcore intakes" and the vararam or DMS ram air systems, all aftermarket intakes available for the GTOs are basically hot air intakes.
Old 03-15-2010, 09:57 PM
  #23  
Teching In
iTrader: (3)
 
99APSSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Stock 04 M6 with a K&K filter 2.1 60ft 13.4 @ 106.

Have you checked the AFR with a WBO2or made a dyno pull to see what HP it is making?
Old 03-16-2010, 10:47 AM
  #24  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Canada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: St.Louis
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 06 6.0 GTO
Other then custom made "hardcore intakes" and the vararam or DMS ram air systems, all aftermarket intakes available for the GTOs are basically hot air intakes.
You forgot SVEDE OTRCAI. Ditching my k&n for this one.
Old 03-16-2010, 11:37 AM
  #25  
12 Second Club
 
breze84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I ran a 13.2 @ 106 bone stock and a 12.8 @ 109 with LT's and Tune... It all depends on DA and Temp... Ya you see guys running lower than you but you have to take into consideration that not everyone is running at your track... Each track has a different DA do to location... DA stands for "Dense Altitude", The higher the DA at the track the slower your time will be... That plays a huge factor in your times...
Old 03-16-2010, 12:42 PM
  #26  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
necrocannibal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Memphis,TN
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts


Default

Just another story cementing the fact that GTOs are indeed slow...........
Old 03-20-2010, 04:45 AM
  #27  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Canada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: St.Louis
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

More like another GTO that needs a driver mod. A heavier car with IRS will take some getting use to. Just keep at it and put some decent tires on there and you'll be fine.
Old 03-20-2010, 09:06 AM
  #28  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
twinturbo496's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Racine, Wisconsin
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default Why are people complaining about the track times?

My hot rod is apart in the garage, so I convinced my wife to take her 05 auto to the track, first pass ever for the car, first pass ever for her.

Full tank of fuel, leave at idle, no burnout, left the trans in "3", traction control on, me riding along to show her the turn out & return road. She weighs 150, I weigh 180, Right lane #845F.

Only real "cheat" would be that it was pretty cool out last night, about 55 degrees when she made this pass.

Mod's on her car: flowmasters & air filter she paid $14K with 35K miles.

What am I supposed to complain about? Her first pass ever was close to some of the better stock 1969 GTO numbers I have found, and I assume those are 4 speed numbers.

Only made one pass because she got kicked out for no helmet.
Attached Thumbnails 13.7 @ 106? wtf-nadeen-s-first-pass-pir.jpg  
Old 03-20-2010, 10:53 AM
  #29  
TECH Enthusiast
 
danieloneil01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Dickinson, Tx
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Can you either post it up as an image or tell us what it ran? You should click the image and see if you can read it.

And I have alot of respect for people who can pull a sub 13.7 in a basically stock GTO with a manual. It takes skill to do it. Not so much if you just stick it in "D".
Old 03-20-2010, 09:41 PM
  #30  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
twinturbo496's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Racine, Wisconsin
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I agree that running a stick at the track is much harder than auto. My comment was directed towards: "Just another story cementing the fact that GTOs are indeed slow"

How can an 05 GTO be considered "slow" if my wife, with zero experience in a stock auto car with a full tank of gas and a 180# passenger can go out to the track and run 13.86@101 on her first pass ever???
Old 03-20-2010, 09:49 PM
  #31  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
twinturbo496's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Racine, Wisconsin
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by danieloneil01
Can you either post it up as an image or tell us what it ran? You should click the image and see if you can read it.
I can read the time slip ok, but perhaps this will work better.
Old 03-20-2010, 09:57 PM
  #32  
Teching In
 
eatlead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: NH
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Over 2 seconds to go 60 feet and you dont think that hs anything to do with it?!? who the f$#%^ said that? ..doesnt matter.. fix that and your in the 12's

Plus PIR is not the greatest of tracks ( its a road coarse that they try and make money with drags on), poor prep usually.. go to Woodburn and you should fare better
Old 03-20-2010, 10:15 PM
  #33  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
twinturbo496's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Racine, Wisconsin
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I really don't think that is a bad time for a stock street car on street tires.

The GTO is heavy compared to a 60's era mid size cars, probably at least 300 pounds heavier due to air bags, power seats, stereo crap, more crash bracing...

But: How many 60's cars could run better than 14 flat right off the lot, with full exhaust and street tires? Even if you give them a set of new 235 radials, I bet it is a lot harder to find one than people think.
Old 03-21-2010, 01:02 AM
  #34  
TECH Enthusiast
 
danieloneil01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Dickinson, Tx
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by twinturbo496
I can read the time slip ok, but perhaps this will work better.
That was my bad. I was trying to read it on my projector and it didn't show it as big as it does on my other pc. It shows up good.
Old 03-21-2010, 01:05 AM
  #35  
11 Second Club
 
old_goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Pasadena, Texas
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by twinturbo496
I agree that running a stick at the track is much harder than auto. My comment was directed towards: "Just another story cementing the fact that GTOs are indeed slow"

How can an 05 GTO be considered "slow" if my wife, with zero experience in a stock auto car with a full tank of gas and a 180# passenger can go out to the track and run 13.86@101 on her first pass ever???
You were baited by a troll and he caught you.

Your wife's time was outstanding for a newbie at the track with zero experience. Give her some practice time and a good track with a good DA and she should be in the 13.1-13.3 range.

If you look at this site. http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html you will see that a 13.3 is faster than most 60's and early 70's muscle cars.

Originally Posted by twinturbo496

The GTO is heavy compared to a 60's era mid size cars, probably at least 300 pounds heavier due to air bags, power seats, stereo crap, more crash bracing...

But: How many 60's cars could run better than 14 flat right off the lot, with full exhaust and street tires? Even if you give them a set of new 235 radials, I bet it is a lot harder to find one than people think.
Good points. These modern cars are so much better than those 60's muscle cars. In good weather my car is a 12.9 second car (bone stock) and in bad weather it is a 13.1 second car, yet I have all the creature comforts one could ask for with air conditioning, 6 cd changer, full interior, etc., 4300 pound car, and is FAR safer than any of those muscle cars. I may get **** poor gas mileage with 18-20 mpg, however those 60's and 70's muscle cars could hardly pass up a gas station.

Last edited by old_goat; 03-28-2010 at 02:24 AM.
Old 03-21-2010, 01:42 AM
  #36  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (18)
 
9Green-Z8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: dallas tx
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yeah switch that intake to a cold air one



Quick Reply: 13.7 @ 106? wtf



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:18 AM.