Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

243 head question... larger valves or more compression

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-24-2017, 05:31 AM
  #21  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
NC_John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Rockwell, NC
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I just picked up my 243's from AI on Friday. Went with the 232 cc with 2.055 intake valves, milled to 62 cc. 403 build though so a little more air moving through.

Last edited by NC_John; 04-24-2017 at 05:40 AM.
Old 04-24-2017, 07:27 AM
  #22  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (21)
 
sillysspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: MD
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=JakeFusion;19601406]That's not how you look at velocity. You look at coefficient of discharge.

See this post for more information on it: https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...l#post19592368

The TEA Stage 2 heads are the ones with the larger valves. Stage 1 is the stock valves like AI.

What would I do? Well since I had the same dilemma back in 2013 when I bought my heads, I did TEA Stage 2. And would do them again, everyday of the week. They've made 520rwhp on a 346 with a 234 duration cam. And over 550 on a 408 with a pretty mild cam... think 239 duration. But more importantly, they are fast as hell at the track. The flow numbers don't mean jack. They make real power and run fast. Flycut your pistons and run as much compression as you can. Aim for 8.7:1 DCR.

Btw, the valve job they do is the same ones TEA cuts into their TFS heads. And that's where most of the power is. QUOTE///


This is exactly why I went with TEA stage 2 243's. They always perform well from mild to big cams from 346-400+ ci. Should have mine at the track in the next few weeks. Expecting some quick times!

Last edited by sillysspeed; 04-24-2017 at 07:33 AM.
Old 04-24-2017, 11:24 AM
  #23  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,590
Received 1,443 Likes on 1,001 Posts

Default

While I will probably go with Land Speedon my current 416 build, I have used TEA on two previous projects.

99 TA 224 XE-R cam, old TEA Stage 2 5.3 heads = 418hp @ wheels the TEA heads have 128,000+ miles on the heads with the XE-R cam, ~15 years is pretty impressive quality to hold together. Had valve springs etc, with new valve seals this old package uses 1 quart of oil every 4,000 miles

91 RS 383 LS1 229/229 Morgan Motorsports v2.1 cam from back in 2001 one, TEA LS6 Stage 2.5 hand finished with NOS exhaust port, with TPIS LS6 intake 465 whp - I'm sure with a big cam they would make big numbers.
Old 04-24-2017, 04:39 PM
  #24  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
FCar2000TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,661
Received 177 Likes on 136 Posts

Default

I keep bouncing back and forth between TEA, AI, and PRC. Everytime, I end up wanting to get TEA.

What would the power difference be between TEA stage 1 and stage 2?

Last edited by FCar2000TA; 04-24-2017 at 04:49 PM.
Old 04-24-2017, 06:37 PM
  #25  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
FCar2000TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,661
Received 177 Likes on 136 Posts

Default

Ok. So, I factored in the test bore size. Then I calculated the Coefficient of Discharge..I think I got the formulas correct.



Last edited by FCar2000TA; 04-28-2017 at 03:40 PM.
Old 04-24-2017, 06:39 PM
  #26  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
tech@WS6store's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,660
Received 241 Likes on 185 Posts
Default

You are getting too caught up on numbers. You're already leaning toward TEA. Just use em and dont look back.
Old 04-24-2017, 09:51 PM
  #27  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
07NBSChevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I had my stock 243's from my Gen4 LMG 5.3 ported and milled by TSP-PRC, I went with the Stage 1 and had them milled roughly 0.010" which is 63cc chambers. Going from stock valves (2.00/1.55) to what PRC offers (2.02/1.575) would only gain 3-5 HP above 5k RPM on a sub 4" Bore engine that is mildly modded, according to TSP.

Not worth the extra $200 in my opinion. I found some "New" LS6 Hollow Stem/Sodium Filled valves and dropped those in instead. If you are going for a max effort engine, then the larger valves will gain you a few extra ponies.

More Compression will benefit the entire rpm range and will yield more power and torque.
Old 04-25-2017, 02:34 PM
  #28  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
FCar2000TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,661
Received 177 Likes on 136 Posts

Default

I think I am going to go with TEA stage 1. Since I don't know the cam specs, and I don't want to have to change cams or fly-cut pistons... I think this is the best choice.
Old 04-25-2017, 02:34 PM
  #29  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
FCar2000TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,661
Received 177 Likes on 136 Posts

Default

Is there any benefit to having the combustion chamber smoothed out?
Old 04-25-2017, 03:39 PM
  #30  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 138 Likes on 115 Posts

Default

Polish/Soften? Are you going to run nitrous or boost?
Old 04-25-2017, 03:50 PM
  #31  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
FCar2000TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,661
Received 177 Likes on 136 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JakeFusion
Polish/Soften? Are you going to run nitrous or boost?
yeah, polished. I am staying NA.
Old 04-25-2017, 10:02 PM
  #32  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 138 Likes on 115 Posts

Default

It allows more timing/compression with all things being equal. Really helps with nitrous or a turbo. But has benefits NA as well.
Old 04-26-2017, 12:43 PM
  #33  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
 
BlwnLs1GTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

FWIW,
PRC Doesn't Polish the chambers. I purchased their stg. 2.5 LQ9 heads with new heads. While their website clearly shows Polished chambers and is misleading, my heads were 100% untouched. I asked about it and they said that it's not included with the As-is price.

Wish I would have known this prior to purchasing because I would have paid to have them polished up and or smooth out the rough casting surface.

Hope I didn't miss out on anything by not having this done ...

I'd go with the TEA if I were in your shoes now.

Last edited by BlwnLs1GTO; 04-26-2017 at 12:49 PM.
Old 04-26-2017, 01:36 PM
  #34  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 138 Likes on 115 Posts

Default

TEA CNC'd the chambers on mine, creating a new chamber shape and quench area. The softening does the same thing - to change how the flame front travels and to alter the quench area/shape. TEA does it with the CNC - but for like another $100 or so they will go back and hand finish and create a mirror polish on the chamber which takes it to another level.
Old 04-27-2017, 01:50 PM
  #35  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
FCar2000TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,661
Received 177 Likes on 136 Posts

Default

I think I have made up my mind. I am getting the TEA stage 1 on my heads. I can have them bumped up to stage 2 if/when I get big CID shortblock.
Old 04-27-2017, 02:03 PM
  #36  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
DANOZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: MPLS MN
Posts: 1,215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

have you compared all the flow #'s vs $$$? last i checked awhile ago texas speed stage 2.5 were the best bang for buck for a 400 hp or better ls1. just my one cent.
Old 04-27-2017, 02:24 PM
  #37  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
FCar2000TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,661
Received 177 Likes on 136 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DANOZ28
have you compared all the flow #'s vs $$$? last i checked awhile ago texas speed stage 2.5 were the best bang for buck for a 400 hp or better ls1. just my one cent.
PRC are probably the best bang for the buck. TEA stage 1 looks to have better velocity in the middle, and can be upgraded to TEA stage 2 later on. As far as the numbers are concerned, for a cathedral port 226cc and lower, TEA stage 2 beats just about everything... even aftermarket castings
Old 04-27-2017, 02:29 PM
  #38  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
tech@WS6store's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,660
Received 241 Likes on 185 Posts
Default

If you are solely talking flow numbers of the tsp 2.5 ls6 head, the trick flow 220 as cast flows more than it does at mult points and has a better valve angle. We have the trick flows with a .650 titanium spring kit for $100 more than the stock ported tsp castings. And the trick flows are on a 3.9 bore and the 2.5 ls6s are on a 3.910 so cannot make a direct comparison but close enough.
The only issue is trick flow wont mill the heads in house So you are "stuck" with a 64cc chamber. The chamber is cncd but the runners are cast...which means there is ALOT of upgrades you can still do to them. You do have an option of a 2.04 or 2.055 intake valve for the same price though. The 2.055 valved head is considered an "ls2" head and as such is flowed on a 4inch bore. it doesnt show a change in exhaust flow...which is actually odd and possibly a typo or formatting issue. I can find out on that though. But you do get a brand nee head, brand new casting, new guides, etc. They are bronze, but we do also have the pm guides available pretty cheap to have installed if you dont want to shim your stockers or use roller rockers. They are also new stainless valves as well. Out of the box they are a good head. With some attention from the right people they are a GREAT head.

Another option that was huge a while back, but has been looked over lately.

Ive been over all of the tips, tricks, and info on about 5 different cyl heads out there comparing stock ported castings to aftermarkets, and in the end, we have sold 5 sets of trick flows in different iterations.
Old 04-27-2017, 02:38 PM
  #39  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
tech@WS6store's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,660
Received 241 Likes on 185 Posts
Default

That seemed very one sided so i will say the tsp head is a vert good budget head. They have new machines and programs and have changed quite a bit since moving. They are working their way up in cam design also. The stock castings that tsp cncs are a good budget setup, the only reason those customers went with tfs is the ability to upgrade later on with the same head and the marginal cost difference. If a customer wants a tsp head, we will sell it to them! If they want a full rundown comparison of comparable heads, they will get that also! We aim to please and to inform to the best of our ability.
Old 04-27-2017, 03:08 PM
  #40  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
FCar2000TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,661
Received 177 Likes on 136 Posts

Default

Does the intake runner size affect the velocity at all, or is it just the size of the valve the affects velocity?


Quick Reply: 243 head question... larger valves or more compression



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:07 AM.