Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Death wish? 4.8 turbo build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-25-2017, 10:53 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
OxTheGreat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Houston
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Death wish? 4.8 turbo build

Project: General
Code name: Operation Suicide

1999 Firebird V6 converted to V8

Power Plant:
2000 LR4 4.8L junkyard motor
*UPDATED* VS Racing billet C480 80/96 1.32 AR
*UPDATED* Microquirt ECU but depending on budget MS3
Rebuilt SBE
Ring gaped to .024 top and bottom
862 heads, DIY ported
ARP Head STUDs
LS9 head gasket
BTR hardened push rods
BTR .660 springs w/ titanium retainers
*UPDATED*LJMS custom grind, spinning to 7500rpms (Thank you John for helping me out)
Connecting rod bolts ARP2000
LS2 Timing chain
Bosch 2200cc Injectors running E85 or VP C85
Stock truck Manifold (probably going to shave it)
Fuel rails (looking at FAST -8 AN rails)
Trick flow SFI 25% underdrive dampener

Drive Line;
FTI 1.80 level 3 Powerglide rated to 1100hp (I assume that means 1100 crank hp)
SFI rated Flex plate
*UPDATE*​​​ PTC 9.5" 16 blade Torque converter
custom drive shaft (Special thanks to Dusty for your knowledge)
*UPDATE* MWC Fab 9" with a Nodular 4.56 spool (rated to 1000hp) narrowed 3 inchs

Suspension:
MWC K memeber
MWC Lower A arms
MWC Double Adj lower control arms
MWC Double Adj Pan hard bar
MWC Long torque arm
BMR 1.25" drop springs front and rear
Shocks......havent decided
*UPDATED* MWC sub frame connectors (Thanks Charlie)
*UPDATED* MWC drive shaft loop ( Thanks Charlie)

Brakes:
Manual master cylinder
*UPDATE* Strange front and rear
Hurst Roll control

Fuel:
Dual AEM380lph pumps
-10 AN feed line Aeroequipt
-8 AN return Aeroequipt
Areomotive regulator
Sumped fuel cell thinking 5 gal. but not sure what material to use

Wheels and tires:
Weld RTS 15x10 5.5 bs on rears
No idea on the fronts
Tires will be drag radials and leaning towards 275s or variation there of

Safety:
MWC 10 point roll cage with added dash bar and x bar in rear
Kirkey Pro racing seat
Racecraft Fbody mounts
5 point harness

Hoping to strip car down to a 2900lbs (3250 race weight)

Where are my flaws? What are things im not considering?
Id like any input because this build is moving faster than i expected and want reassuance before i head into major spending

Last edited by OxTheGreat; 06-11-2017 at 03:52 AM.
Old 05-25-2017, 10:56 PM
  #2  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
OxTheGreat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Houston
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

*edit* Microsquit ECU
Old 05-25-2017, 11:22 PM
  #3  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
MY_2K_Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,140
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 34 Posts

Default

I don't think the ls3 pan is going to fit
Old 05-25-2017, 11:30 PM
  #4  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
OxTheGreat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Houston
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MY_2K_Z
I don't think the ls3 pan is going to fit
Noted, ill pay close attention during mock up
Old 05-26-2017, 07:36 AM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
 
svslow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OxTheGreat
Torque converter will be with PCT but havent planned out stall, maybe 5000-5500
I doubt you will need that much converter. PTC will be able to get you what you need though.
Old 05-26-2017, 09:08 AM
  #6  
Restricted User
 
JoeNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,194
Received 104 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

Ambitious.

I would probably rethink the cam, oil pan, injectors, turbo, dampener, converter, maybe even fuel system. Otherwise this will end up as one of those ridiculous builds that someone dumps way too much money into and then keeps coming back here to complain about what isn't working right.

You haven't said anything about goals or intended use.
Old 05-26-2017, 09:21 AM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (25)
 
truckdoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Portlandia
Posts: 6,330
Received 526 Likes on 356 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by OxTheGreat
Operation Suicide

Originally Posted by JoeNova
You haven't said anything about goals or intended use.

i think that clears that up
Old 05-26-2017, 12:03 PM
  #8  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
SLOW SEDAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: No VA
Posts: 4,025
Received 944 Likes on 700 Posts

Default

Skip the rod bolts, you'll bend the rods before you hurt the bolt. And if it has any miles on it I would skip the rings too, I've run plenty of boost on stock ring gap without issue on E85.
Old 05-26-2017, 12:06 PM
  #9  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
mkvamso's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 735
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

id ditch the dual pumps in favor of a single magnafuel 4303, especially if youre sumping the tank.
a stock fbody oil pan will be fine, if it 60's killer you might need to over fill it
you also wont need arp rod bolts if the bottom end is stock otherwise. they wont do anything for you the stockers dont already do except possibly oval the big end of the rod when you torque them down.
Old 05-27-2017, 03:52 AM
  #10  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
OxTheGreat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Houston
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JoeNova
Ambitious.

I would probably rethink the cam, oil pan, injectors, turbo, dampener, converter, maybe even fuel system. Otherwise this will end up as one of those ridiculous builds that someone dumps way too much money into and then keeps coming back here to complain about what isn't working right.

You haven't said anything about goals or intended use.
drag, and HP gain is relative at the moment, hoping for 850-950Whp (i know thats gonna be hard but a man can dream)
*edit* The cam was spec'd build and i trust LJMS and contrary to popular belief im not going to come running crying. Im here to learn and thus far its almost a 70/30 split 70% say my build so far has potential with proper tuning 30% have the same outlook as you. Not saying what you believe isnt valid, but this is meant to be fun and a challenge

Last edited by OxTheGreat; 05-27-2017 at 03:58 AM.
Old 05-27-2017, 03:53 AM
  #11  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
OxTheGreat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Houston
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by truckdoug
i think that clears that up
drag purposes only
Old 05-27-2017, 03:55 AM
  #12  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
OxTheGreat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Houston
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mkvamso
id ditch the dual pumps in favor of a single magnafuel 4303, especially if youre sumping the tank.
a stock fbody oil pan will be fine, if it 60's killer you might need to over fill it
you also wont need arp rod bolts if the bottom end is stock otherwise. they wont do anything for you the stockers dont already do except possibly oval the big end of the rod when you torque them down.
the 4303 is my other idea if funds are available at that time since im primarily putting the engine together now
Old 05-27-2017, 07:56 AM
  #13  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
boostedrides's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: GA
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you do gap the rings Gap the bottom one 2k more than the top or the rings will flutter. Example, top ring 024. Bottom ring 026.

At minimum I would at least check the ring gap, especially if you are going to lean on it like you say you are.
Old 05-27-2017, 09:27 AM
  #14  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
SLOW SEDAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: No VA
Posts: 4,025
Received 944 Likes on 700 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by boostedrides
If you do gap the rings Gap the bottom one 2k more than the top or the rings will flutter. Example, top ring 024. Bottom ring 026.

At minimum I would at least check the ring gap, especially if you are going to lean on it like you say you are.
Define lean on it? Stock bottom will take everything that turbo has. I've ran an 88 and a billet S480 on 27lbs on stock ring gap and it's fine, you'll bend rods before you pinch rings on a good tune. Really nothing but heat turning it up higher, it will make a bit more boost but the gain per pound drop drastically.
Old 05-27-2017, 09:59 AM
  #15  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
boostedrides's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: GA
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yea and if his ring gap is tighter than yours, he will not know unless he checks it. Not trying to start a pissing match with you, but it doesn't hurt to check gap if you know what you are doing.
Old 05-27-2017, 11:19 AM
  #16  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
SLOW SEDAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: No VA
Posts: 4,025
Received 944 Likes on 700 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by boostedrides
Yea and if his ring gap is tighter than yours, he will not know unless he checks it. Not trying to start a pissing match with you, but it doesn't hurt to check gap if you know what you are doing.
True it doesn't hurt to check. But my low mileage 6.0 saw 32lbs and again no issue with rings, multiple 5.3's no issue, honestly I haven't seen anyone have an issue on e85 and a good tune. You'll bend the stock rods before screwing up a piston, heck I've bent a crank before messing up a piston.

If hes he's going to take the bottom end apart might as well throw some rods in it for piece of mind, quicker then doing rings and it's an actual upgrade.
Old 05-27-2017, 03:10 PM
  #17  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
OxTheGreat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Houston
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by boostedrides
If you do gap the rings Gap the bottom one 2k more than the top or the rings will flutter. Example, top ring 024. Bottom ring 026.

At minimum I would at least check the ring gap, especially if you are going to lean on it like you say you are.
My new rings are all .024. Did them myself
Old 05-27-2017, 03:13 PM
  #18  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
OxTheGreat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Houston
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SLOW SEDAN
True it doesn't hurt to check. But my low mileage 6.0 saw 32lbs and again no issue with rings, multiple 5.3's no issue, honestly I haven't seen anyone have an issue on e85 and a good tune. You'll bend the stock rods before screwing up a piston, heck I've bent a crank before messing up a piston.

If hes he's going to take the bottom end apart might as well throw some rods in it for piece of mind, quicker then doing rings and it's an actual upgrade.
bottom end was taken apart, cleaned, rings gaped and put back together with new bearings. At the time funds couldnt support new rods and i couldn't find gen 4s.
Old 05-27-2017, 06:39 PM
  #19  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
mOtOrHeAd MiKe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ottawa Ontario, Canada - where arguing "DA" is for the slow and weak...
Posts: 1,129
Received 32 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

https://www.liljohnsmotorsports.com/...ge-ii-cam.html

If that is the cam you are considering then we have almost identical builds going together. However, I plan on using a more a conservative turbo(s), and won't be replacing the internals because I want a lower power level.
Old 05-27-2017, 06:48 PM
  #20  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
OxTheGreat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Houston
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mOtOrHeAd MiKe
https://www.liljohnsmotorsports.com/...ge-ii-cam.html

If that is the cam you are considering then we have almost identical builds going together. However, I plan on using a more a conservative turbo(s), and won't be replacing the internals because I want a lower power level.
well it's not identical to that it's pretty close but it's nowhere near the stage 3 that's why I just said I'll call it stage 2 but it is a custom grind so I'm sure yours is close to mine as well. My internals haven't changed I'm still running a 9.5:1 compression just with the bigger cam and upgraded valve train


Quick Reply: Death wish? 4.8 turbo build



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:03 AM.