Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

4.8 twins or single

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-29-2018, 07:41 PM
  #1  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
MaroonMonsterLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Iowa
Posts: 3,542
Received 1,218 Likes on 782 Posts

Default 4.8 twins or single

I picked up a 1987 caprice classic 4 door and have decided it needs to make more power and be way faster than it was ever intended to be. I'm trying to decide what turbo(s) to run on this thing and figured there's not many better places to ask.
I'll start with a rundown of the build then get into the turbo's i'm looking into.

Stock bottom 4.8
stock port/valve 706 heads milled to 59cc
.045 MLS head gaskets
Static compression=10:1
LJMS Stage 2 4.8 turbo cam... 218/223 .598/.571 112+3
Stock truck manifolds flipped forward
Stock Truck intake
Ported stock throttle body
4l80e
8.5" 10 bolt rear. Haven't decided gear yet (probably about 3.00-3.55 range)

Here are the turbos I'm considering. Let me know if there is a better option for my goals.
I want to make 600 tire MAX
Somewhere around 550 would be totally acceptable
Light off pretty quickly, just be a fun tire fryer and light to light car. Making boost in the mid 2000 rpm range would be awesome

twin GT2871 (T3)
50/71 Compressor .61A/R
71/54 turbine .64 AR


twin GT3076 (T3)
57/76 Compressor .6A/R
84/60 Turbine .82 A/R

Single VS Racing/on3 style 76mm
76/102 compressor .8 A/R
74.5/65 Turbine .96 A/R

These are just some of the setups I've read other people using and so that's what I am looking into,
If there is a better option out there or something people have had luck with, don't hesitate to throw the options into the ring. I'm sure the A/R could be changed also if someone thinks that would be beneficial

Thanks for any advice guys!
Old 08-29-2018, 08:17 PM
  #2  
TECH Apprentice
 
Bazman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 332
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Go twins and go small, pay a little more for the R option (ball bearing) they are rated at 430hp each and you'll need that to achieve 700rw. If you can't afford the R go next size up, but def go twins. You won't be sorry.

There's plenty of guys will brag about having bigger units and faster singles, but yours will get it done, come on quicker, be super useable, throttle controllable and fun. Don't look back. At 600rw you'll be having way too much fun to care about whether a big single has a better top end. My 2 cents

And I'd look at a wave trac/trutrac diff - much safer than the old school LSD

Last edited by Bazman; 08-29-2018 at 08:24 PM.
Old 08-31-2018, 07:52 AM
  #3  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,849
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

You didn’t indicate a budget?

I don’t agree with the info above, but everyone is welcome to an opinion! Ball bearing designs offer very little in performance vs cost. They are also not rebuild-able if you scrap one. Most china “ball bearing” turbos usually aren’t even a full ball bearing design. Usually have the typical journal main bearing with a ball bearing support on the compressor side.

Twins are twice the work and plain unnecessary for a 600hp goal. I’d run a single cast S366. It will spool VERY quick, install easily, and meet your goal easily.

If you must go twins, look to the GT3582 with the small T3 .63 housings. You can get them for about $140 shipped and they are proven performers. I’ve got a set on a 5.3 on 15lbs and they spool quick and make great power.

The ON3 76mm is s poor design. Split between the exhaust wheel and compressor is to large making it laggy by nature. This is then off set by using a tiny housing and using higher back pressures to drive it. That said it would still meet your power goals. It’s just not a great unit. VSracing sells a 76/68 that would work a bit better if you don’t want to spend the money on the Borg Warner turbos.

Most of the guys with “spool issues” don’t have the hot side setup properly and/or have the tune off. With a 600hp goal you should be using 2” hot side piping. This keeps the exhaust velocity up and helps greatly with spool. 2” to each side of the scroll on an S366 would spool crazy quick with 10:1 4.8 and that cam.
Old 08-31-2018, 10:09 AM
  #4  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
MaroonMonsterLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Iowa
Posts: 3,542
Received 1,218 Likes on 782 Posts

Default

I'm looking at the journal bearing turbos for the exact reason you stated. Cheaper, simpler, I can rebuild myself if need be, not enough gains for the ball bearing at my power level

I'd like to keep the turbo(s) under $500

I have read a few build threads with the 366 and they seemed to be maxx'd at about 540 wheel with a 5.3.
I think the 76/68 might be a good option, I just picked the 76/65 because I've seen alot of good results from guys. Can you explain why the split between exhaust and compressor makes it laggy. I thought this was actually one of the better spooling options...was I mistaken?

Thanks for advising the hot side advice. I have been debating between 2" and 2.25"
I know the 2" will spool better, but I don't want it to choke me out as I reach towards that 600 wheel power number. Do you think 2" will be an issue at 600?
Old 08-31-2018, 11:29 AM
  #5  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,849
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

“Better spooling” doesn’t translate into efficient power per pound of boost. S366 would stomp that turbo spool wise and make more power per pound as well as flow more overall.

The S366 will make 600whp on a 4.8 and it will do it quickly. They flow 70-80lb min at reasonable back pressure ratios. But if you want under $500 I’d be looking at the 76/68. I’d go with the T4 S475 clones VS racing sells but they are right at $500 shipped.

The wheel sizes have to do with leverage. Bigger the exh wheel the more energy it can extract to drive the compressor. If the turbine is smaller than the compressor it’s going to be at a disadvantage. One of the reasons the S366 is so good. 66mm compressor and 73mm exhaust wheel.

2” is MORE than enough for a 4.8 with 600 hp goals. I’m making 1000ish on 2” with a 370 cubes at 19-20lbs of boost. The 4.8 is 292 cubes.
Old 08-31-2018, 03:32 PM
  #6  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
3 window's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,051
Received 185 Likes on 135 Posts
Default

A buddy of mine put a legit s366 t4 .91 on a 5.3 in his ‘65 c10 and he says it’s downright ignorant (in a good way) as far as boost. By the time your foots to the floor it’s there. That’s with 2.25 off each manifold to a merge that’s about 4” long. You can find the s366 for about $560 if you look hard enough.
Old 08-31-2018, 03:35 PM
  #7  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
MaroonMonsterLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Iowa
Posts: 3,542
Received 1,218 Likes on 782 Posts

Default

So is that 66mm compressor is gonna flow enough for 600 WHEEL?
Old 08-31-2018, 03:40 PM
  #8  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
3 window's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,051
Received 185 Likes on 135 Posts
Default

Depends on what else is done to the engine. Maybe at 15 psi. I’ve also heard of another guy that makes 15 max on a 5.3 with one. That’s with the gate pinned. They’re WAY smaller than even my t4 475 for packaging.
Old 08-31-2018, 03:46 PM
  #9  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
MaroonMonsterLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Iowa
Posts: 3,542
Received 1,218 Likes on 782 Posts

Default

So is that 66mm compressor really gonna flow enough for 600 WHEEL?
Old 08-31-2018, 03:49 PM
  #10  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
MaroonMonsterLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Iowa
Posts: 3,542
Received 1,218 Likes on 782 Posts

Default

Sorry for the multi post there. Mobile app issues.

Motor will be stock aside from cam and milled heads...Stock port

Packaging is a non issue...I have enough room under the hood of this car to stand and do jumping jacks
Old 08-31-2018, 06:17 PM
  #11  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,849
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

Yes it will make 600 on a mild 4.8.
Old 09-01-2018, 01:51 AM
  #12  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
gametech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockbridge GA
Posts: 4,068
Likes: 0
Received 432 Likes on 307 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MaroonMonsterLS1
I'm looking at the journal bearing turbos for the exact reason you stated. Cheaper, simpler, I can rebuild myself if need be, not enough gains for the ball bearing at my power level

I'd like to keep the turbo(s) under $500

I have read a few build threads with the 366 and they seemed to be maxx'd at about 540 wheel with a 5.3.
I think the 76/68 might be a good option, I just picked the 76/65 because I've seen alot of good results from guys. Can you explain why the split between exhaust and compressor makes it laggy. I thought this was actually one of the better spooling options...was I mistaken?

Thanks for advising the hot side advice. I have been debating between 2" and 2.25"
I know the 2" will spool better, but I don't want it to choke me out as I reach towards that 600 wheel power number. Do you think 2" will be an issue at 600?
Keep in mind that a 366 will actually make MORE power with a 4.8 than a 5.3. The smaller motor requires the same exhaust pressure to achieve the same flow as the bigger motor. The intake pressure, however, is higher on the smaller motor at the same flow. This gives a more favorable backpressure ratio to the smaller motor at any given flow rate.
Old 09-01-2018, 10:58 AM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (25)
 
kbracing96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sutherlin OR
Posts: 8,929
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I made 570 with a s366 non-intercooled on a blow through carb on a 5.3. With converter locked and a little more boost, probably could have broken 600. It's an awesome sounding tubo too! lol Best whistling turbo I've used yet. It's an absolute blast to drive in my c10 with it. Comes on super fast!
Old 09-04-2018, 12:21 PM
  #14  
8 Second Club
 
fegoins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 16
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

2007 4.8 w/150k miles, untouched bottom end and heads, BTR Stage 2, BTR springs, 7875 VS Billet, 4l80e w/HD kit, 8.8 w/3:73 gears, A2A, E85, truck manifold one side, LS1 to clear AC on the other. Just started tuning AFR on wastegate, timing not touched yet, 7lbs in first, 9 lbs the rest of the run. Trapped 129.xxx in the quarter, 3400lbs with me in it. Calculated to 560hp crank. I'd have to check a datalog when I get home to see what rpm boost starts building on the street. Can provide more detail if you want it.

Now 10.300 @ 135

Last edited by fegoins; 11-25-2018 at 02:39 PM.
Old 09-04-2018, 12:27 PM
  #15  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
MaroonMonsterLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Iowa
Posts: 3,542
Received 1,218 Likes on 782 Posts

Default

Yea I'd love to know when it makes boost
Old 09-04-2018, 01:40 PM
  #16  
Restricted User
 
JoeNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,194
Received 104 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

A pair of ebay knockoffs of the GT28s with a smaller cam than yours on a 4.8 made 600whp on 93.
Swapped in a 5.3 shortblock. Same power on 2 PSI less boost. Starts making boost at 2100 RPM.
Old 09-04-2018, 02:40 PM
  #17  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
MaroonMonsterLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Iowa
Posts: 3,542
Received 1,218 Likes on 782 Posts

Default

Damn 2100. That's early.
Any idea on more details of the setup? Build thread anywhere?
Old 09-04-2018, 05:15 PM
  #18  
TECH Apprentice
 
Bazman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 332
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I re-read my post and had missed you run an auto. Forcefed86 is right - a single will get the job done perfectly. I ran a rear mount single on an auto and it could boost from a stop without a trans brake - just squeeze and go. A manual has lag in 1st gear normally. In your app, with auto I'd go single too. For a manual I prefer twins
Old 09-04-2018, 09:10 PM
  #19  
8 Second Club
 
fegoins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 16
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by fegoins
2007 4.8 w/150k miles, untouched bottom end and heads, BTR Stage 2, BTR springs, 7875 VS Billet, 4l80e w/HD kit, 8.8 w/3:73 gears, A2A, E85, truck manifold one side, LS1 to clear AC on the other. Just started tuning AFR on wastegate, timing not touched yet, 7lbs in first, 9 lbs the rest of the run. Trapped 129.xxx in the quarter, 3400lbs with me in it. Calculated to 560hp crank. I'd have to check a datalog when I get home to see what rpm boost starts building on the street. Can provide more detail if you want it.
Looking through my logs it looks like 2800 is where it lights off pretty consistantly while driving. On foot brake it will build 7psi at 2500 at -8 degrees in four seconds.
Old 09-21-2018, 09:10 AM
  #20  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
MaroonMonsterLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Iowa
Posts: 3,542
Received 1,218 Likes on 782 Posts

Default

Getting all kinds of different feedback the more I talk to people.

What do you guys think about a set of GT3582 turbos? Maybe give me a little more headroom to grow if I want, and still spool fairly quickly?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:22 AM.