Single S369 on an LS3 back pressure
#1
Single S369 on an LS3 back pressure
No question here, just information, I like to read about peoples weird setups so I assume other people do to.
I have an S369 with Borg 1.0 divided turbine housing on an LS3 with XER273 (224/230 114) cam. I installed a back pressure sensor and thought I would share my results here. I have an AGP 1.27 open housing I am going to put on soon and will post the differences.
My MAP sensor is the standard GM 3 bar. The back pressure sensor is a Zeitronix 50psi MAP sensor, it has the same scaling and costs the same as the Holley 3.5bar sensor so I have it set as that in my Holley HP.
With the engine off, the MAP sensor shows 94kpa and the bp sensor shows 87kpa. So I calculated pressure as anything above those numbers respectively with 6.4kpa as 1psi on the MAP and 5.9kpa as 1psi on the bp sensor.
MAT shows 73* outside temp with the engine off.
This is boost vs bp
5500 6.6--13.2
6000 6.5--15.1
6250 6.7--15.4
6500 7.0--16.4 2.3:1 ratio
The ending MAT is 153* with no intercooler so about 11* per psi of boost, the compressor seems to be plenty at this low boost at least, thats very acceptable temp rise non-intercooled. The bp isn't very good but not terrible either, I am hoping the 1.27 open housing will get it down to 2:1 or a hair under. Im sure as the boost goes up the bp ratio might change but maybe not much.
I have an S369 with Borg 1.0 divided turbine housing on an LS3 with XER273 (224/230 114) cam. I installed a back pressure sensor and thought I would share my results here. I have an AGP 1.27 open housing I am going to put on soon and will post the differences.
My MAP sensor is the standard GM 3 bar. The back pressure sensor is a Zeitronix 50psi MAP sensor, it has the same scaling and costs the same as the Holley 3.5bar sensor so I have it set as that in my Holley HP.
With the engine off, the MAP sensor shows 94kpa and the bp sensor shows 87kpa. So I calculated pressure as anything above those numbers respectively with 6.4kpa as 1psi on the MAP and 5.9kpa as 1psi on the bp sensor.
MAT shows 73* outside temp with the engine off.
This is boost vs bp
5500 6.6--13.2
6000 6.5--15.1
6250 6.7--15.4
6500 7.0--16.4 2.3:1 ratio
The ending MAT is 153* with no intercooler so about 11* per psi of boost, the compressor seems to be plenty at this low boost at least, thats very acceptable temp rise non-intercooled. The bp isn't very good but not terrible either, I am hoping the 1.27 open housing will get it down to 2:1 or a hair under. Im sure as the boost goes up the bp ratio might change but maybe not much.
#3
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
No question here, just information, I like to read about peoples weird setups so I assume other people do to.
I have an S369 with Borg 1.0 divided turbine housing on an LS3 with XER273 (224/230 114) cam. I installed a back pressure sensor and thought I would share my results here. I have an AGP 1.27 open housing I am going to put on soon and will post the differences.
My MAP sensor is the standard GM 3 bar. The back pressure sensor is a Zeitronix 50psi MAP sensor, it has the same scaling and costs the same as the Holley 3.5bar sensor so I have it set as that in my Holley HP.
With the engine off, the MAP sensor shows 94kpa and the bp sensor shows 87kpa. So I calculated pressure as anything above those numbers respectively with 6.4kpa as 1psi on the MAP and 5.9kpa as 1psi on the bp sensor.
MAT shows 73* outside temp with the engine off.
This is boost vs bp
5500 6.6--13.2
6000 6.5--15.1
6250 6.7--15.4
6500 7.0--16.4 2.3:1 ratio
The ending MAT is 153* with no intercooler so about 11* per psi of boost, the compressor seems to be plenty at this low boost at least, thats very acceptable temp rise non-intercooled. The bp isn't very good but not terrible either, I am hoping the 1.27 open housing will get it down to 2:1 or a hair under. Im sure as the boost goes up the bp ratio might change but maybe not much.
I have an S369 with Borg 1.0 divided turbine housing on an LS3 with XER273 (224/230 114) cam. I installed a back pressure sensor and thought I would share my results here. I have an AGP 1.27 open housing I am going to put on soon and will post the differences.
My MAP sensor is the standard GM 3 bar. The back pressure sensor is a Zeitronix 50psi MAP sensor, it has the same scaling and costs the same as the Holley 3.5bar sensor so I have it set as that in my Holley HP.
With the engine off, the MAP sensor shows 94kpa and the bp sensor shows 87kpa. So I calculated pressure as anything above those numbers respectively with 6.4kpa as 1psi on the MAP and 5.9kpa as 1psi on the bp sensor.
MAT shows 73* outside temp with the engine off.
This is boost vs bp
5500 6.6--13.2
6000 6.5--15.1
6250 6.7--15.4
6500 7.0--16.4 2.3:1 ratio
The ending MAT is 153* with no intercooler so about 11* per psi of boost, the compressor seems to be plenty at this low boost at least, thats very acceptable temp rise non-intercooled. The bp isn't very good but not terrible either, I am hoping the 1.27 open housing will get it down to 2:1 or a hair under. Im sure as the boost goes up the bp ratio might change but maybe not much.
#5
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
No question here, just information, I like to read about peoples weird setups so I assume other people do to.
I have an S369 with Borg 1.0 divided turbine housing on an LS3 with XER273 (224/230 114) cam. I installed a back pressure sensor and thought I would share my results here. I have an AGP 1.27 open housing I am going to put on soon and will post the differences.
My MAP sensor is the standard GM 3 bar. The back pressure sensor is a Zeitronix 50psi MAP sensor, it has the same scaling and costs the same as the Holley 3.5bar sensor so I have it set as that in my Holley HP.
With the engine off, the MAP sensor shows 94kpa and the bp sensor shows 87kpa. So I calculated pressure as anything above those numbers respectively with 6.4kpa as 1psi on the MAP and 5.9kpa as 1psi on the bp sensor.
MAT shows 73* outside temp with the engine off.
This is boost vs bp
5500 6.6--13.2
6000 6.5--15.1
6250 6.7--15.4
6500 7.0--16.4 2.3:1 ratio
The ending MAT is 153* with no intercooler so about 11* per psi of boost, the compressor seems to be plenty at this low boost at least, thats very acceptable temp rise non-intercooled. The bp isn't very good but not terrible either, I am hoping the 1.27 open housing will get it down to 2:1 or a hair under. Im sure as the boost goes up the bp ratio might change but maybe not much.
I have an S369 with Borg 1.0 divided turbine housing on an LS3 with XER273 (224/230 114) cam. I installed a back pressure sensor and thought I would share my results here. I have an AGP 1.27 open housing I am going to put on soon and will post the differences.
My MAP sensor is the standard GM 3 bar. The back pressure sensor is a Zeitronix 50psi MAP sensor, it has the same scaling and costs the same as the Holley 3.5bar sensor so I have it set as that in my Holley HP.
With the engine off, the MAP sensor shows 94kpa and the bp sensor shows 87kpa. So I calculated pressure as anything above those numbers respectively with 6.4kpa as 1psi on the MAP and 5.9kpa as 1psi on the bp sensor.
MAT shows 73* outside temp with the engine off.
This is boost vs bp
5500 6.6--13.2
6000 6.5--15.1
6250 6.7--15.4
6500 7.0--16.4 2.3:1 ratio
The ending MAT is 153* with no intercooler so about 11* per psi of boost, the compressor seems to be plenty at this low boost at least, thats very acceptable temp rise non-intercooled. The bp isn't very good but not terrible either, I am hoping the 1.27 open housing will get it down to 2:1 or a hair under. Im sure as the boost goes up the bp ratio might change but maybe not much.
I bet it is a blast to drive!
Andrew
Last edited by Project GatTagO; 01-19-2019 at 04:07 PM.
#7
Trending Topics
#9
9 Second Club
Brake pipe is dead easy to work with for this purpose.
So that's BP covered in this application....but what about a graph of boots vs rpm ?
From say 1000rpm ? Does it actually spool super fast ?
So that's BP covered in this application....but what about a graph of boots vs rpm ?
From say 1000rpm ? Does it actually spool super fast ?
#11
Well frig, the 1.27 open doesn't seem to be any different back pressure wise. Attach is a pic of some of the housings, doesn't really show much.
It does spool very fast. I had a billet PT7675 on an LS2 with these same heads, intake, cam, injectors, and this is noticeably more response but not a huge amount. In the logs cruising along anywhere around 2000rpm or lower and flooring it it shows 1psi at 0.4 seconds so it is fast. It is a th350 with a relatively tight PTC nitrous converter so rpm vs boost doesn't really make sense compared to a manual.
The thing that is a little odd is it doesn't seem to peter off all the way to 6500rpm. I had a TC78 on a 6.0 many years ago and it seemed to really struggle up there...I wish I knew what the bp was on that.
127
It does spool very fast. I had a billet PT7675 on an LS2 with these same heads, intake, cam, injectors, and this is noticeably more response but not a huge amount. In the logs cruising along anywhere around 2000rpm or lower and flooring it it shows 1psi at 0.4 seconds so it is fast. It is a th350 with a relatively tight PTC nitrous converter so rpm vs boost doesn't really make sense compared to a manual.
The thing that is a little odd is it doesn't seem to peter off all the way to 6500rpm. I had a TC78 on a 6.0 many years ago and it seemed to really struggle up there...I wish I knew what the bp was on that.
127
#12
9 Second Club
On the road does it feel any different ?
Any tuning adjustments needed ?
I guess if the housing didnt really change much at all, it might just indicate the turbine itself is more restrictive than the actual housing.
Although if it spools, makes the boost etc you want, and hangs on to enough rpm's you need then it's all good.
Any tuning adjustments needed ?
I guess if the housing didnt really change much at all, it might just indicate the turbine itself is more restrictive than the actual housing.
Although if it spools, makes the boost etc you want, and hangs on to enough rpm's you need then it's all good.
#14
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
Basically what it shows is that this turbo is about maxed out as Hank is using it. The far right dot is about falling off the compressor map. What is more interesting is that the predicted back pressure in the exhaust is about what Hank measured. It isn't exact, but pretty damn close.
It also shows that at 6500rpm he is making about 650hp at the crank, which sounds about right.
Andrew
#15
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (14)
Well frig, the 1.27 open doesn't seem to be any different back pressure wise. Attach is a pic of some of the housings, doesn't really show much.
It does spool very fast. I had a billet PT7675 on an LS2 with these same heads, intake, cam, injectors, and this is noticeably more response but not a huge amount. In the logs cruising along anywhere around 2000rpm or lower and flooring it it shows 1psi at 0.4 seconds so it is fast. It is a th350 with a relatively tight PTC nitrous converter so rpm vs boost doesn't really make sense compared to a manual.
The thing that is a little odd is it doesn't seem to peter off all the way to 6500rpm. I had a TC78 on a 6.0 many years ago and it seemed to really struggle up there...I wish I knew what the bp was on that.
127
It does spool very fast. I had a billet PT7675 on an LS2 with these same heads, intake, cam, injectors, and this is noticeably more response but not a huge amount. In the logs cruising along anywhere around 2000rpm or lower and flooring it it shows 1psi at 0.4 seconds so it is fast. It is a th350 with a relatively tight PTC nitrous converter so rpm vs boost doesn't really make sense compared to a manual.
The thing that is a little odd is it doesn't seem to peter off all the way to 6500rpm. I had a TC78 on a 6.0 many years ago and it seemed to really struggle up there...I wish I knew what the bp was on that.
127
#18
No longer have the 63. Gathering parts for a 64 "sleeper" build at the moment. Currently have a gen4 5.3 and 4l80e. Will probably go with the 372.