Small Block & Big Block Chevy Specific Mouse & Rat Motor Discussion & Conversions

brodix 180IK or 200Ik

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-29-2008, 05:17 PM
  #1  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
t6378tp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default brodix 180IK or 200Ik

I am building a chevy 355 with a rpm air gap intake, 10.1:1 CR and a comp cam roller 282hr cam with 1.52 roller tip rockers. cam spec's are Lift: .510''/.520'' Duration: 282°/288°

I am only planning to run this motor to 6500rpms and starting to wonder if the heads might be alittle too big. any opinions or suggestions
Old 05-30-2008, 12:44 AM
  #2  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
chevyguy7802's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Burleson,Texas
Posts: 2,237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

What kinda ride is this going in? And is it a street strip car?
Old 05-30-2008, 10:33 AM
  #3  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
RAGENZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Port Hueneme, CA
Posts: 2,467
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'd run the 200cc, it'll give you more room to grow.
Old 05-30-2008, 12:54 PM
  #4  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
t6378tp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RAGENZ28
I'd run the 200cc, it'll give you more room to grow.
yes it's going in a street/strip s10

that what I was thinking the same thing that these heads maybe alittle big now but will give me room to grow and the 180's would be perfect now but will be too small later down the road

but I did some reading and calling around and looks like these heads will be fine long as a run a decent size cam ie over 500 lift
Old 05-30-2008, 06:32 PM
  #5  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
RAGENZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Port Hueneme, CA
Posts: 2,467
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

We ran a set of sportsman II the 200 cc heads on a 355 chevy that had a 750 carb, performer rpm, 234/244 .480/.510 lift, 9.5-1, 1 3/4" headers TH350 with a 3500 stall in a 3rd gen camaro and it was a fun good running street car.

If you ever do much to the car it's going to run out of air pretty quick with a 180cc head.

You have pretty much the same setup with a better cam, your cam duration is 230/236@.050 it should also make peak power under 6,500. We used another cam that was 236/242 and it peaked right at 6,300-6,500 so that cam should work really well with the rpm range you want. I'd shift that right about about 6,200-6,500.

Last edited by RAGENZ28; 05-30-2008 at 06:39 PM.
Old 05-30-2008, 08:02 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Ryan02SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lake Anna, VA/ Fairmont, WV
Posts: 1,795
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by t6378tp
I am building a chevy 355 with a rpm air gap intake, 10.1:1 CR and a comp cam roller 282hr cam with 1.52 roller tip rockers. cam spec's are Lift: .510''/.520'' Duration: 282°/288°

I am only planning to run this motor to 6500rpms and starting to wonder if the heads might be alittle too big. any opinions or suggestions
I vote for the 200cc runners. I am using AFR 190cc heads on my 385 and they perform awesome but they outflow most 200cc ports of other heads. Why are you limiting yourself to a 355 vs a 383? I've had both and will never build a stock stroke 350 based engine again after having a 383.
Old 05-31-2008, 07:48 AM
  #7  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
t6378tp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ryan02SS
I vote for the 200cc runners. I am using AFR 190cc heads on my 385 and they perform awesome but they outflow most 200cc ports of other heads. Why are you limiting yourself to a 355 vs a 383? I've had both and will never build a stock stroke 350 based engine again after having a 383.
Money
Old 05-31-2008, 12:47 PM
  #8  
In-Zane Moderator
iTrader: (25)
 
ZONES89RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Conroe, Texas
Posts: 11,939
Received 32 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

Yea, like stated above, the comp XE288HR would be a better choice and use the 200 CC IKs, my buddy used them with a milder cam but they worked great.
Old 06-09-2008, 09:14 AM
  #9  
TECH Resident
 
moge11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Champaign IL
Posts: 814
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Unless using vortecs due to $$$ restraints or unless using AFR 195's, Then you should never use less than the 200cc heads on a Performance engine.



Quick Reply: brodix 180IK or 200Ik



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:11 PM.