4 way: 2 Cammed camaros - Bolt On Cobra - Turbo S2000..........LS3 Vette vs Turbo S2K
#1
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Houston. Texas.
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
4 way: 2 Cammed camaros - Bolt On Cobra - Turbo S2000..........LS3 Vette vs Turbo S2K
ShiFtSlow Pictures:
S2slw: Turbo S2000
DatBoi_LS3: Stock LS3 Corvette
Boofthese: Cammed LS1 Camaro
Bash: Bolt on Cobra
SZ28: Cammed LS1 Camaro (auto)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CfL8Y38b0I0
enjoy
S2slw: Turbo S2000
DatBoi_LS3: Stock LS3 Corvette
Boofthese: Cammed LS1 Camaro
Bash: Bolt on Cobra
SZ28: Cammed LS1 Camaro (auto)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CfL8Y38b0I0
enjoy
#6
Trending Topics
#8
Come on man I may have been born at night but it wasn't last night. If that thing is remotely durable and reliable and runs like that it wasn't inexpensive. If it was done inexpensivly it isn't either of those. That engine is pretty durable but it isn't built for boost it was built to spin into oblivion and that doesn't lend itself to long life under boost. Judging by the way it moved out the boost wasn't low.
#9
driving a fast honda is like coming out of the closet at first everyones shocked but in the end your still a ***, lol jk that thing hauls *** and if i raced him i wouldnt be happy because he would make me spend lots of money that i dont have
#10
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Come on man I may have been born at night but it wasn't last night. If that thing is remotely durable and reliable and runs like that it wasn't inexpensive. If it was done inexpensivly it isn't either of those. That engine is pretty durable but it isn't built for boost it was built to spin into oblivion and that doesn't lend itself to long life under boost. Judging by the way it moved out the boost wasn't low.
#11
Well it was only pulling that stock LS3 Vette by a little bit. LS3s have ~385rwhp stock and weigh ~3100lbs. With 3.42s. S2000s have 4.10s stock and weigh ~2850lbs. So if the S2000 had ~400-425rwhp, that should be enough to get the results shown in the video. S2000s run 500rwhp+ on stock internals with a good tune.
#12
Well it was only pulling that stock LS3 Vette by a little bit. LS3s have ~385rwhp stock and weigh ~3100lbs. With 3.42s. S2000s have 4.10s stock and weigh ~2850lbs. So if the S2000 had ~400-425rwhp, that should be enough to get the results shown in the video. S2000s run 500rwhp+ on stock internals with a good tune.
#14
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC / Ansonia,CT
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
eleven also didnt mention the car has a 2step, and much more than just a turbo and a tune. and im not just saying this because im a honda "basher" either. that car has extensive work done to it, and a lot of money thrown at it. my cousin has a 10.6 honda that is reliable and i know what was thrown at that to be correct and reliable.
#18
i'm so ****** happy i got the first post in and i couldn't have been more right...eleven's is up in this thread like a pedo in kindergarten.
Me +1
but for real that s2000 is a 30000$ car right frankie?
Me +1
but for real that s2000 is a 30000$ car right frankie?
#20