So it was not Bullit after all.
11-16-2003, 01:34 PM
#1
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Truck Heaven
Posts: 7,277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So it was not Bullit after all. I just came across this this. Check it out.
http://ebaumsworld.com/family.html
http://ebaumsworld.com/family.html
11-16-2003, 02:20 PM
#7
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Truck Heaven
Posts: 7,277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Super Mario
Lol, you guys actually thought he was serious about that being bullitt? 
Trending Topics
11-17-2003, 06:03 AM
#10
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: michigan; where even our licens plates rust
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hey guys to you know that "gullible" is not in the dictonary... go ahead you know you want to check it out 
ok move over strong bad email , thats my new favorite sight now. i love the "they are not alloud to have children" thats great. ill definetly go on to single sights and pick up chicks and see how many of them actully believe that that is my family. hehehe
ok move over strong bad email , thats my new favorite sight now. i love the "they are not alloud to have children" thats great. ill definetly go on to single sights and pick up chicks and see how many of them actully believe that that is my family. hehehe
11-17-2003, 03:30 PM
#12
TECH Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Cornwall, NY
Posts: 3,066
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dammit Cuda, why couldnt you spell gullible wrong. You spell nearly everything else wrong. If you spelled it something like gullable, I coulda said, Nope, your right, gullable ISNT in the dictionary. But Gullible is... ... ... I dont know why I bothered writing that...
