Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

Ran up against another '11 5.0

Old 12-28-2010, 12:44 AM
  #61  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
mannyman84's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hawthorne CA
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by kennyxg
good kill! what does your car run at the track?
I've never been.
Old 12-28-2010, 02:05 AM
  #62  
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
NiteRiderWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mannyman84
I've never been.
isnt this your 2nd 5.0 Kill stop picking on these cars

Last edited by NiteRiderWS6; 12-28-2010 at 02:10 AM.
Old 12-28-2010, 02:12 AM
  #63  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
mannyman84's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hawthorne CA
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by NiteRiderWS6
isnt this your 2nd 5.0 Kill stop picking on these cars
But it's fun
Old 12-28-2010, 09:43 AM
  #64  
Launching!
 
MauriSSio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by slayer performance
so only crappy drivers have mustangs? seems to be a common excuse.. i mean reason for losing
ive seen a ton of f-bodies run high 13's and low 14's and even have it on video. It happens. If a 370rwhp 3600lbs car (that ALSO makes more tq) loses to a 300rwhp 3500lbs car, its obvious what just happened isnt the typical outcome.
Old 12-28-2010, 11:12 AM
  #65  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Don't forget more aggressive transmission AND rearend gearing
Old 12-28-2010, 11:35 AM
  #66  
TECH Regular
 
Ke^in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
You've also had your car for quite some time, IIRC. All I'm saying is that you can't expect every guy you run on the street to be completely on his game. That has nothing to do with your race, it's more in response to the people saying, "Well I guess the 5.0s aren't all they're cracked up to be blah blah blah."
Exactly.
Old 12-28-2010, 11:40 AM
  #67  
Launching!
 
MauriSSio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Don't forget more aggressive transmission AND rearend gearing
the biggest variable i notice about comparing with older cars is a lot of them have some kind of weight reduction done to them and is never mentioned. I always hear people say " with intake and exhaust i ran xx.xx time" but also dont mention that they removed 300lbs of stuff and running on 1 gallon of gas or whatever.
Old 12-28-2010, 12:23 PM
  #68  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
 
CyberGrey Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by slayer performance
i'm hearing alot of excuses lol
I was waiting for the excuses lol. These die hard Ford guys just can't comprehend that a lightly modded LS1 will run with the new 5.0 GT.

I think Manny posted that he beat a base model 5.0 a few months back and immediately the Ford guys were all upset saying he should have raced a TracPac. Now he raced and beat a TracPac 5.0 they're only explanation is that the GT driver wasn't on his A game.

Every time an LS1 owner races a 5.0 owner we're going to have to make sure the 5.0 driver sanctioned to race and take the LS1 to the scales to make sure we didn't loose 300 lbs
Old 12-28-2010, 12:40 PM
  #69  
Launching!
 
MauriSSio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CyberGrey Z28
I was waiting for the excuses lol. These die hard Ford guys just can't comprehend that a lightly modded LS1 will run with the new 5.0 GT.

I think Manny posted that he beat a base model 5.0 a few months back and immediately the Ford guys were all upset saying he should have raced a TracPac. Now he raced and beat a TracPac 5.0 they're only explanation is that the GT driver wasn't on his A game.

Every time an LS1 owner races a 5.0 owner we're going to have to make sure the 5.0 driver sanctioned to race and take the LS1 to the scales to make sure we didn't loose 300 lbs
not necesarily. We know things can happen. LT1 cars beat LS1 cars all the time. The power to weight differences between those two cars is extremely similar to the 5.0 vs LS1. So we are aware that these things happen. Its not like the "ford guys" came in here insulting anyone with name calling or gay smilies so please dont try to turn this one into a flame war and keep it civil/grown up.

Last edited by MauriSSio; 12-28-2010 at 12:47 PM.
Old 12-28-2010, 01:07 PM
  #70  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
necrocannibal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Memphis,TN
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts


Default

Originally Posted by MauriSSio
not necesarily. We know things can happen. LT1 cars beat LS1 cars all the time. The power to weight differences between those two cars is extremely similar to the 5.0 vs LS1. So we are aware that these things happen. Its not like the "ford guys" came in here insulting anyone with name calling or gay smilies so please dont try to turn this one into a flame war and keep it civil/grown up.
I think he was just referring to all of the excuses the Ford guys were using instead of understanding "things can happen" and saying good kill and moving on. When these cars were released I said it was going to be a drivers race between them and a LS1 f body with a slight edge to the Stang. All the Ford guys said "noway blah blah blah". Anyway it looks like it is indeed just that, both owners will have to be on their toes when racing the other and thats awesome and the way it should be.
Old 12-28-2010, 01:30 PM
  #71  
TECH Regular
 
Ke^in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Considering the Mach1 and LS1 has less distance between it and a LS1 and a 5.0, and it's hard to get anyone in here to admit the Mach1 and LS1 are drivers races, how is the LS1 and 5.0 so?

Old 12-28-2010, 01:31 PM
  #72  
Launching!
 
MauriSSio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by necrocannibal
I think he was just referring to all of the excuses the Ford guys were using instead of understanding "things can happen" and saying good kill and moving on. When these cars were released I said it was going to be a drivers race between them and a LS1 f body with a slight edge to the Stang. All the Ford guys said "noway blah blah blah". Anyway it looks like it is indeed just that, both owners will have to be on their toes when racing the other and thats awesome and the way it should be.
my definition of SLIGHT is a little different. Half a second and 5mph average difference is a lil more than slighht to me. Its not a huge advantage for the 5.0 though, just similar to the advantage an LS1 car has over an LT1 car. Some see those two as only slightly different so i guess its all in how you see it. With that said, none of the ford guys said anything in any disrespectful way.
Old 12-28-2010, 01:50 PM
  #73  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
thunderstruck507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest AR
Posts: 8,357
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

I think it's a good combination of manny's car running hard for what it is and a poor driver in the 5.0

My little brother has one and I've driven it, ridden in it, and raced it. His is the 3.55 gears and it's still fast for stock.

I've said it before and I'll say it again, if you stock/ light bolt on ls1 guys run up on a well driven 5.0 you're going to get your feelings hurt if you're not on your A game IMO.
Old 12-28-2010, 02:02 PM
  #74  
Launching!
 
MauriSSio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ke^in
Considering the Mach1 and LS1 has less distance between it and a LS1 and a 5.0, and it's hard to get anyone in here to admit the Mach1 and LS1 are drivers races, how is the LS1 and 5.0 so?

+1 And somehwere between the LS1 and 5.0 is the LS2 GTO and LS3 2010 Camaro
Old 12-28-2010, 02:11 PM
  #75  
On The Tree
iTrader: (7)
 
nevrlift13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: long beach, ca.
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

nice ****** kill man...i know the new 5.0 is a far cry from the feeble 2vs and seminot feeble 3vs...ford actually didnt do a bad job with it they fianlly stepped up their game
Old 12-28-2010, 02:32 PM
  #76  
TECH Regular
 
Ke^in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've seen 3v GTs hit low 13s stock easily. Much like a stock LS1.

2V GTs are however more in the LT1 range. Somewhere between a LT1 and a LS1.
Old 12-28-2010, 02:50 PM
  #77  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by slayer performance
so only crappy drivers have mustangs? seems to be a common excuse.. i mean reason for losing
Where are these "common excuses"? I'll wait while you go get more examples.

I said driver mod because 1. A LS1 with a filter like Manny says his car has isn't going to outrun a 11' 5.0 with an equal driver. 2. You can clearly see in the video when the 5.0 shifts it falls back quite a bit (ex: shitty driver)

IMO its going to be hard to run up on a good driver in a brand new 2011 GT out on the street. Most I've seen have older guys that baby the car and if they do get on the car like in video they do not plan to shift it "like they stole it".
Old 12-28-2010, 03:39 PM
  #78  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
necrocannibal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Memphis,TN
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts


Default

What is funny and I dont have a dog in this fight so dont care and if I was buying a new "muscle/pony" car I'd be the new 5.0 so Im very unbiased, but that these "excuses" of shitty drivers the Ford guys are now saying are the same "excuses" of shitty drivers the LS1 guys used when a 2V or even the 99 Cobras would beat an LS1. I just find it amusing the way the things flip back and forth between these two companies brand loyal guys.
Old 12-28-2010, 03:57 PM
  #79  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
 
CyberGrey Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MauriSSio
not necesarily. We know things can happen. LT1 cars beat LS1 cars all the time. The power to weight differences between those two cars is extremely similar to the 5.0 vs LS1. So we are aware that these things happen. Its not like the "ford guys" came in here insulting anyone with name calling or gay smilies so please dont try to turn this one into a flame war and keep it civil/grown up.
Don't be so sensitive, you ford fairy
320-340 rwhp in a 3500 lbs (typical bolt-ons LS1 car) vs. 350-370rwhp in a 3700 lbs (typical stock GT car) = a close race. Yes the 5.0 is definitely a step up from 2V and 3V's but I still think they're are hyped up. I guess I'm just partial to Termis and older foxbodys.

Last edited by CyberGrey Z28; 12-28-2010 at 04:00 PM. Reason: ...
Old 12-28-2010, 04:00 PM
  #80  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CyberGrey Z28
Don't be so sensitive, you ford fairy
330rwhp in a 3500 lbs LS1 car vs. 360rwhp in a 3700 lbs GT car = a close race. Yes the 5.0 is definitely a step up from 2V and 3V's but I still think they're are hyped up. I guess I'm just partial to Termis and older foxbodys.
There is alittle more to the performance of a car other than hp ratings and weight of the car.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Ran up against another '11 5.0



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:55 PM.