Cammed LS2 GTO vs. 11 5.0
#63
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Glendale
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Good Kill on the 5.0, i guess the mustang is getting a ton of hype as to how fast and well it performs that some people start blowing them up too much. Its a great car no doubt but im suprised as well he thought he was going to pull on a cammed GTO with just exhaust. Either way it was a nice vid, wish my speakers would work so i can hear it, lol.
#64
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Apparently you misinterpreted my post.
The 30-40hp that gto has over the 5.0 is not enough to compensate for the 200lb more the gto weighs.
Also you gain around 0.1 in the 1/4 for every 100 lbs lost.
I am aware each car is different.....
The 30-40hp that gto has over the 5.0 is not enough to compensate for the 200lb more the gto weighs.
Also you gain around 0.1 in the 1/4 for every 100 lbs lost.
I am aware each car is different.....
#68
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Glendale
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
C&D says about 3751 LBS but sometimes i know those arent accurate.
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...take_road_test
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...take_road_test
#70
Staging Lane
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
fixed it, that was what I meant. ![Grin](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_grin.gif)
Excuse me? Wait, let me get this straight, YOU are acting like you're superior to ME? LMAO One typo on my part doesn't negate all the stupid intentionally written crap that you have generated over the years. But if it makes your wood get hard, then go right ahead and pat yourself on the back.
![Grin](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_grin.gif)
Excuse me? Wait, let me get this straight, YOU are acting like you're superior to ME? LMAO One typo on my part doesn't negate all the stupid intentionally written crap that you have generated over the years. But if it makes your wood get hard, then go right ahead and pat yourself on the back.
#71
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
C&D says about 3751 LBS but sometimes i know those arent accurate.
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...take_road_test
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...take_road_test
#72
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Coupe Convertible
Manual transmission 3,875 (est.) 4,000 (est.)
Automatic transmission 4,000 (est.) 4,000 (est.)
Weight distribution (f/r) 54/46 (est.) 54/46 (est.)
loaded weights.
Read more: http://www.mustang50magazine.com/fea...#ixzz1QgrcUXHF
Gear ratios
1st 3.66
2nd 2.43
3rd 1.69
4th 1.32
5th 1.00
6th 0.65
Final drive 3.31:1
Optional 6-speed automatic
Gear ratios
1st 4.17
2nd 2.34
3rd 1.52
4th 1.14
5th 0.87
6th 0.69
Final drive 3.15:1
Read more: http://www.mustang50magazine.com/fea...#ixzz1QgrpmfkM
Manual transmission 3,875 (est.) 4,000 (est.)
Automatic transmission 4,000 (est.) 4,000 (est.)
Weight distribution (f/r) 54/46 (est.) 54/46 (est.)
loaded weights.
Read more: http://www.mustang50magazine.com/fea...#ixzz1QgrcUXHF
Gear ratios
1st 3.66
2nd 2.43
3rd 1.69
4th 1.32
5th 1.00
6th 0.65
Final drive 3.31:1
Optional 6-speed automatic
Gear ratios
1st 4.17
2nd 2.34
3rd 1.52
4th 1.14
5th 0.87
6th 0.69
Final drive 3.15:1
Read more: http://www.mustang50magazine.com/fea...#ixzz1QgrpmfkM
#73
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
BASE CURB WEIGHT (POUNDS)
Manual transmission 3,605 (est.) 3,720 (est.)
Automatic transmission 3,653 (est.) 3,770 (est.)
Weight distribution (f/r) 54/46 (est.) 53/47 (est.)
http://media.ford.com/images/10031/2...g_GT_Specs.pdf
Manual transmission 3,605 (est.) 3,720 (est.)
Automatic transmission 3,653 (est.) 3,770 (est.)
Weight distribution (f/r) 54/46 (est.) 53/47 (est.)
http://media.ford.com/images/10031/2...g_GT_Specs.pdf
#74
12 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NH
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Yes full exhaust means headers also. I do not know the DA but it was in the Fall and our track is at sea level.
2011 5.0 Mustang 6 speed 3.73
JLT intake
Stainless works full exhaust
Tune
12.0 at 118mph with a 1.8 60' on drag radials.
I'm just sharing my experience, not bashing or anything.
#75
![Question](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon5.gif)
Excuse me? Wait, let me get this straight, YOU are acting like you're superior to ME? LMAO One typo on my part doesn't negate all the stupid intentionally written crap that you have generated over the years. But if it makes your wood get hard, then go right ahead and pat yourself on the back.
No one knows who the **** you are. I'm known all over the WORLD and atleast 3 people right now on this forum are admitting to wanting to **** me if they were drunk (one said sober lol). Bitch in 13 years you will be lucky to equal me now..
#76
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Yes full exhaust means headers also. I do not know the DA but it was in the Fall and our track is at sea level.
2011 5.0 Mustang 6 speed 3.73
JLT intake
Stainless works full exhaust
Tune
12.0 at 118mph with a 1.8 60' on drag radials.
I'm just sharing my experience, not bashing or anything.
2011 5.0 Mustang 6 speed 3.73
JLT intake
Stainless works full exhaust
Tune
12.0 at 118mph with a 1.8 60' on drag radials.
I'm just sharing my experience, not bashing or anything.
Why only a 1.8 60ft? On stock suspension should be able to get least 1.6-1.7 if launching hard on DR's.
#77
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: MD
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Gear ratios
1st 3.66
2nd 2.43
3rd 1.69
4th 1.32
5th 1.00
6th 0.65
Final drive 3.31:1
Optional 6-speed automatic
Gear ratios
1st 4.17
2nd 2.34
3rd 1.52
4th 1.14
5th 0.87
6th 0.69
Final drive 3.15:1
Read more: http://www.mustang50magazine.com/fea...#ixzz1QgrpmfkM
1st 3.66
2nd 2.43
3rd 1.69
4th 1.32
5th 1.00
6th 0.65
Final drive 3.31:1
Optional 6-speed automatic
Gear ratios
1st 4.17
2nd 2.34
3rd 1.52
4th 1.14
5th 0.87
6th 0.69
Final drive 3.15:1
Read more: http://www.mustang50magazine.com/fea...#ixzz1QgrpmfkM
#79
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Case and point why the 5.0 isnt **** from a roll. 4.17 first gear is insane. I said this when these things first came out. If it wasnt for the transmission aggressive transmission the 1/4 times wouldn't be close to what people claim. But the problems have been abundant with them so with the good comes the bad
![Nod](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_nod.gif)
#80
Staging Lane
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Grin](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_grin.gif)
For some reason certain individuals prefer the same sex for there relationships, but I'm not one to judge so I'll let you carry that cross all you want. lol