5.0 vs GTR
12-12-2011, 04:37 PM
#181
Launching!
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
exactly! the challenger looks bloated even when compared to a full sized car! The doors are like 4 feet high themselves!(not including the top half with the windows)
like i said the challys are beautiful cars but look like they were built on a 5/4 scale! kinda reminds me of when i was a kid playing with Hot Wheels and whe i would mix them with the off-brands (Matchbox?) the off brands would have some cars that obviously werent built to scale, usually too big. didnt look bad until you put them next to the Hot Wheels and compared them to the size of the other cars.
like i said the challys are beautiful cars but look like they were built on a 5/4 scale! kinda reminds me of when i was a kid playing with Hot Wheels and whe i would mix them with the off-brands (Matchbox?) the off brands would have some cars that obviously werent built to scale, usually too big. didnt look bad until you put them next to the Hot Wheels and compared them to the size of the other cars.
12-12-2011, 04:40 PM
#182
11 Second Club
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: E-town raceway
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
exactly! the challenger looks bloated even when compared to a full sized car! The doors are like 4 feet high themselves!(not including the top half with the windows)
like i said the challys are beautiful cars but look like they were built on a 5/4 scale! kinda reminds me of when i was a kid playing with Hot Wheels and whe i would mix them with the off-brands (Matchbox?) the off brands would have some cars that obviously werent built to scale, usually too big. didnt look bad until you put them next to the Hot Wheels and compared them to the size of the other cars.
like i said the challys are beautiful cars but look like they were built on a 5/4 scale! kinda reminds me of when i was a kid playing with Hot Wheels and whe i would mix them with the off-brands (Matchbox?) the off brands would have some cars that obviously werent built to scale, usually too big. didnt look bad until you put them next to the Hot Wheels and compared them to the size of the other cars.
12-12-2011, 05:25 PM
#183
2011 SRT8 Challenger 11.96 Pass
stock factory tuning & a few light mods
12/10/2011 TnT test N tune
Dallas Raceway Crandall Texas
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AnrAf...e_gdata_player
Stirring the pot
stock factory tuning & a few light mods
12/10/2011 TnT test N tune
Dallas Raceway Crandall Texas
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AnrAf...e_gdata_player
Stirring the pot
12-12-2011, 06:42 PM
#186
12-12-2011, 07:50 PM
#189
Staging Lane
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Malibu, CA
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This just in from Challenger Talk:The Challenger above mods are intake & cat-back.
Now let's see a 5.0 poopstang go 11.9 with those mods on a factory tune. Won't happen! When tuning software becomes available you Mustang boys better find a good hiding spot.
Now let's see a 5.0 poopstang go 11.9 with those mods on a factory tune. Won't happen! When tuning software becomes available you Mustang boys better find a good hiding spot.
12-12-2011, 08:27 PM
#193
Staging Lane
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Malibu, CA
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Same thing I was thinking. Which means it might go a tenth quicker and trap a mph or so higher with the stock airbox.
12-12-2011, 09:28 PM
#195
It's trapping the same speed bone-stock cars are putting out. I think the only engine mod if any is a cai and im not 100% on that.
12-12-2011, 09:33 PM
#196
Radials /. cai and possibly a catback but don't hold me to it. Tires helped for sure. You can launch the car all out without the t/c.
12-12-2011, 09:34 PM
#197
Yea, but those cylinders are dropping like flys.. just saying.
12-12-2011, 10:14 PM
#199
Launching!
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The dyno graph you posted looks strange to me and dosent say sae anywhere. Never seen a dyno like that before.
Still not convinced.
Just tell me what you trapped quartermile wise. A 464 rwhp 3500 pound car in an average DA of plus 1000 should trap 120-124 mph.
So what did your 464 rwhp car trap?
Btw congrats on the 650 rwhp.
Still not convinced.
Just tell me what you trapped quartermile wise. A 464 rwhp 3500 pound car in an average DA of plus 1000 should trap 120-124 mph.
So what did your 464 rwhp car trap?
Btw congrats on the 650 rwhp.
