Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

5.0 vs GTR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-12-2011, 12:48 PM
  #161  
Launching!
 
MauriSSio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Camaro_94
Doesnt work. Tried. Anything but the new 5.0 is slow and a waste of money according to Ohioborn. My statements were things he said about 5th gens. I'm sure others who witnessed his trolling realized that.
so youre responding in this thread, to something that he said in a different thread?????why??
Old 12-12-2011, 01:03 PM
  #162  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Camaro_94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MauriSSio
so youre responding in this thread, to something that he said in a different thread?????why??
He goes into every 5th gen thread and ruins it.. It's not just 1 thread... It's every 5th gen thread here. I think those who are familiar with me knew I was making fun of him and realized I pretty much took his posts he stated about 5th gens and turned them around on him and replaced it with the 5.0
Old 12-12-2011, 01:05 PM
  #163  
Teching In
 
LightningTeg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Indianapolis Area
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Killemall
I dont know. just somthing seems un natural about everyone running e85 and race gas on AMERICAN cars these days
uh. This is really dumb.
Old 12-12-2011, 01:14 PM
  #164  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
oddwraith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yeah whatever, that's only becaue you're driving the Teg . Lol jk
Old 12-12-2011, 01:59 PM
  #165  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
1_MEANZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Camaro_94
He goes into every 5th gen thread and ruins it.. It's not just 1 thread... It's every 5th gen thread here. I think those who are familiar with me knew I was making fun of him and realized I pretty much took his posts he stated about 5th gens and turned them around on him and replaced it with the 5.0
i know like i told him gtfo...go to the mustang forums ..
Old 12-12-2011, 02:02 PM
  #166  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
ohioborn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 214
Received 252 Likes on 164 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Killemall
sae
actual
standard

(makes a big differance)

also is it normal for the torque to be a hundred below?

If thats 653 SAE then thats pretty sick. Please clarify.
yes it is normal since its a centrifugal supercharger. and these are SAE numbers.

Also I was not on E85 with just bolt ons. Here is dyno sheet from just bolt ons. This was on 93. My car is not the only one to make these numbers with full bolt ons.

Old 12-12-2011, 02:13 PM
  #167  
Teching In
 
dsmfan95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Killemall
I dont know. just somthing seems un natural about everyone running e85 and race gas on AMERICAN cars these days
I agree. **** running American made e85 in American made cars. American made cars deserve the good gasoline from the middle east.
Old 12-12-2011, 02:56 PM
  #168  
Launching!
 
MauriSSio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ohioborn80
yes it is normal since its a centrifugal supercharger. and these are SAE numbers.

Also I was not on E85 with just bolt ons. Here is dyno sheet from just bolt ons. This was on 93. My car is not the only one to make these numbers with full bolt ons.

wow, well the numbers and sheet is up. I wonder if this will satisfy killemall and make a believer out of him finally.
Old 12-12-2011, 02:56 PM
  #169  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
willizm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Joliet,IL and Las Vegas 50/50
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ohioborn80
yes it is normal since its a centrifugal supercharger. and these are SAE numbers.

Also I was not on E85 with just bolt ons. Here is dyno sheet from just bolt ons. This was on 93. My car is not the only one to make these numbers with full bolt ons.

What type of dyno wa that on?
Old 12-12-2011, 02:58 PM
  #170  
TECH Enthusiast
 
ZFreie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MauriSSio
wow, well the numbers and sheet is up. I wonder if this will satisfy killemall and make a believer out of him finally.
Nope, its not a viper
Old 12-12-2011, 03:04 PM
  #171  
Launching!
 
MauriSSio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZFreie
Nope, its not a viper
i agree though that 464rwhp seems a lil high to me, almost as if it were a "Texas Dyno" (optimistic) or something but i dont know what they should really dyno at with full bolt-ons since i havent been in car forums or around car related stuff these last few months. Last i checked they were at closer to 430rwhp but i think that was before the boss intake and maybe a couple other things have become more available. If they do indeed produce 450+rwhp with full boltons thats incredible!! lets just make old engines like mine even MORE obsolete goddamit!!!!
Old 12-12-2011, 03:15 PM
  #172  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
ohioborn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 214
Received 252 Likes on 164 Posts

Default

MM&FF made 468whp with there manual car with same things I have. Only thing different they had was a tb. Which gained 1hp. Few others have made mid 439s on mustang dyno's. And some made 450+ on dyno jets. A lot the ones making 430 don't have a boss intake or font have full exhaust. Or are on email tunes.
Old 12-12-2011, 03:23 PM
  #173  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Z28Z06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Columbia, Md
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dsmfan95
I agree. **** running American made e85 in American made cars. American made cars deserve the good gasoline from the middle east.
Good one dsm.
Old 12-12-2011, 03:34 PM
  #174  
TECH Enthusiast
 
88blackgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Z28Z06
Good one dsm.
His car was built in the United States. Where was yours built?
Old 12-12-2011, 03:49 PM
  #175  
Launching!
 
MauriSSio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ohioborn80
MM&FF made 468whp with there manual car with same things I have. Only thing different they had was a tb. Which gained 1hp. Few others have made mid 439s on mustang dyno's. And some made 450+ on dyno jets. A lot the ones making 430 don't have a boss intake or font have full exhaust. Or are on email tunes.
i see. props then!!!
Old 12-12-2011, 04:05 PM
  #176  
Banned
 
F-Body_4_Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Big Easy
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

2011 SRT8 Challenger 11.96 Pass
stock factory tuning & a few light mods
12/10/2011 TnT test N tune
Dallas Raceway Crandall Texas

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AnrAf...e_gdata_player

Stirring the pot
Old 12-12-2011, 04:12 PM
  #177  
Launching!
 
MauriSSio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by F-Body_4_Life
2011 SRT8 Challenger 11.96 Pass
stock factory tuning & a few light mods
12/10/2011 TnT test N tune
Dallas Raceway Crandall Texas

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AnrAf...e_gdata_player

Stirring the pot
at only 114mph? that run was all tire! I always thought the new ones were supposed to be faster than that!
Old 12-12-2011, 04:25 PM
  #178  
Launching!
 
MauriSSio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LT/LS Guy
These things are getting into the 11's without a stall or any kind of tuning...at 4200+ pounds that's rockin!

All while looking 10x better than the new POS Mustang that's out. Boy did I make the right decision.
the challengers are beautiful cars, but when you put a normal sized car next to it, they look incredibly bloated. I remember riding in a car behind my brothers termi and we were checking out this nice challenger but as it drove by next to us and next to my brothers car that thing looked closer in size to a minivan or small crossover!!!
Old 12-12-2011, 04:25 PM
  #179  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Camaro_94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1_MEANZ28
i know like i told him gtfo...go to the mustang forums ..
Don't get me wrong, I'm all for having diversity here, but him talking **** about every 5th gen with his car and mods is just annoying. Sure, it prob moves out well, but there's always someone faster, and it's not something that a built 5th gen wouldn't be able to handle either. Plenty would put train lengths on his. He acts like his and every other 5.0 out there are factory 8 secnod 1/4 mile cars stock. I post more on SVTP than I do here too...
Old 12-12-2011, 04:30 PM
  #180  
Teching In
 
LightningTeg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Indianapolis Area
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by dsmfan95
I agree. **** running American made e85 in American made cars. American made cars deserve the good gasoline from the middle east.
lmao



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:15 PM.