ZYBORG C5Z vs SHAKN'04 mach1
#162
stopsign's argument is based off being a hater, jus because his car hasnt done what this one has,he feels like he needs to call bs on somone who has posted vids dyno graphs,timeslips and has given all the info on his build on other forums that stopsign is on and whining about this mach, Stopsign has always hated on this car, jus a hater,
2: I know what cars do and don't do at the track.
3: Any full weight 94+ Mustang isn't going to trap 120mph with only 360rwhp.
4: I've posted up plenty of points to compare.
5: If you (whoever you are) and Shakn is so damn worried about what I think, do like I suggested and go to another track.
I'm not jealous in any way, believe me. I'm not trying to go super fast in my Mach 1, just out to hurt some feelings.
#167
1: I've run much faster at the track.
2: I know what cars do and don't do at the track.
3: Any full weight 94+ Mustang isn't going to trap 120mph with only 360rwhp.
4: I've posted up plenty of points to compare.
5: If you (whoever you are) and Shakn is so damn worried about what I think, do like I suggested and go to another track.
I'm not jealous in any way, believe me. I'm not trying to go super fast in my Mach 1, just out to hurt some feelings.
2: I know what cars do and don't do at the track.
3: Any full weight 94+ Mustang isn't going to trap 120mph with only 360rwhp.
4: I've posted up plenty of points to compare.
5: If you (whoever you are) and Shakn is so damn worried about what I think, do like I suggested and go to another track.
I'm not jealous in any way, believe me. I'm not trying to go super fast in my Mach 1, just out to hurt some feelings.
2.not sure you do!
3.first of all shakin car made 368 rwhp, and it did trap 119.90 in 42deg weather twice in the same night!
4.points dont mean ****, post up ur runs,(if its not on vid it dont count)
5.i have personally raced at another track and run dam near the same there as i have at san antoino, as for shakin his car is not just cammed anymore,he has done more stuff to it. Honestly we really dont give a dam what you think,but when your talking trash about shakin's car and calling him a moron and a clown,that's where the problem begins,he has posted up more vids and info about his car and runs than most people do,and for you to act like you know something and start saying our track has broken mph sensors is just retarded.
Last edited by Prime281; 04-06-2012 at 02:06 AM.
#168
Vettes have slick. 28-.32 coeficient drags.
I recently watched a 418 rwhp c6 start pulling on a 460 rwhp viper.
Viper was ahead by two cars from 50-120 and the vette pulled back to nearly even from 120-160.
Zyborgs car at 390 rwhp and slich areodynamics can hang with 123 mph cars despite probally only trapping 120-121 mph in the quarter.
This mach is hitting 119 mph because of launch and tire. 370 rwhp without a killer launch will show its face on a roll and thats what happenned.
I know for a fact some macks hit 105 mph with just 270 rwhp. Adding another 100 rwhp plus increased redline and agressive gearing and a 119 in a good da in very feasable.
#169
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Sure man
Actually the "record" holder for the fastest bolt-on c5z06 is 10.86 or .89 @ 125. He has had a best trap of 126. With that said my bolt-on ls6 consistently trapps over 126 with a best trapp of 130.4.
Actually the "record" holder for the fastest bolt-on c5z06 is 10.86 or .89 @ 125. He has had a best trap of 126. With that said my bolt-on ls6 consistently trapps over 126 with a best trapp of 130.4.
#170
11 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Holy ****! Well that explains it. I'm sure the DA was in the negatives. No wonder the car trapped that. Mineshaft air does wonders for n/a cars. If 368 was SAE that actual that night was probably over 380 being that cold. I'm starting to believe it did go 119. Not the norm due to the weather conditions but.
#171
11 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#173
Banned
iTrader: (3)
There is a differance between quartermile and roll raceing. A z06 thats trapps 120 can eadily roll race with 123 mph cars.
Vettes have slick. 28-.32 coeficient drags.
I recently watched a 418 rwhp c6 start pulling on a 460 rwhp viper.
Viper was ahead by two cars from 50-120 and the vette pulled back to nearly even from 120-160.
Zyborgs car at 390 rwhp and slich areodynamics can hang with 123 mph cars despite probally only trapping 120-121 mph in the quarter.
This mach is hitting 119 mph because of launch and tire. 370 rwhp without a killer launch will show its face on a roll and thats what happenned.
I know for a fact some macks hit 105 mph with just 270 rwhp. Adding another 100 rwhp plus increased redline and agressive gearing and a 119 in a good da in very feasable.
Vettes have slick. 28-.32 coeficient drags.
I recently watched a 418 rwhp c6 start pulling on a 460 rwhp viper.
Viper was ahead by two cars from 50-120 and the vette pulled back to nearly even from 120-160.
Zyborgs car at 390 rwhp and slich areodynamics can hang with 123 mph cars despite probally only trapping 120-121 mph in the quarter.
This mach is hitting 119 mph because of launch and tire. 370 rwhp without a killer launch will show its face on a roll and thats what happenned.
I know for a fact some macks hit 105 mph with just 270 rwhp. Adding another 100 rwhp plus increased redline and agressive gearing and a 119 in a good da in very feasable.
Ah i see thanks for pointing that all, im fairly new to these cars.
Strong this.
#174
Holy ****! Well that explains it. I'm sure the DA was in the negatives. No wonder the car trapped that. Mineshaft air does wonders for n/a cars. If 368 was SAE that actual that night was probably over 380 being that cold. I'm starting to believe it did go 119. Not the norm due to the weather conditions but.
#175
i agree i have had the same experience as well. But i guess when a car starts leaving the line so hard like dead hookin i could see the mph drop and the et too lol.