Finally got my shot...2001 WS6 vs. 2011 5.0 *Vids*
06-27-2012, 06:33 PM
#42
On The Tree
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Chattanooga, tn
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
06-27-2012, 06:52 PM
#43
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DIETlxquzY
^^ you sure this is'nt you?
^^ you sure this is'nt you?
yea.........
06-27-2012, 06:55 PM
#44
yea its 420hp to the crank for the 2013, 2011-2012 goes 411 to the crank. the hp difference comes from a surprising source. its a phosphorus coating on the pistons that the boss models use. besides that the only difference internal wise is the 2013 doesnt have the number 8 cylinder decompression problem a handful of the 2011's had. something to do with the oil squirters.
06-27-2012, 07:00 PM
#45
i disagree with only this from your post. maybe its because i only have to pay 200 bucks for a dyno tune for my 2013. ( i know the guy) i dont know many mods that drop you 2 tenths in the quarter for 200 bucks. besides, i dont track that often. the tune on the street is like a whole new animal, was out one night and a fellow 5.0 owner raced his stock against a modded mach1, digs got him by 1 1/2 to 2 lengths and after a tune and x pipe, got him by 3 1/2 to 4 lengths consistently
06-27-2012, 07:06 PM
#46
On The Tree
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Chattanooga, tn
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i disagree with only this from your post. maybe its because i only have to pay 200 bucks for a dyno tune for my 2013. ( i know the guy) i dont know many mods that drop you 2 tenths in the quarter for 200 bucks. besides, i dont track that often. the tune on the street is like a whole new animal, was out one night and a fellow 5.0 owner raced his stock against a modded mach1, digs got him by 1 1/2 to 2 lengths and after a tune and x pipe, got him by 3 1/2 to 4 lengths consistently
06-27-2012, 07:21 PM
#48
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why alot of you guys think a Stock 5.0 should beat a Full bolt on LS1 is beyond me. Most Stock 5.0's are 109-112 cars and thats a dead heat for a full bolt on LS1. My A4 WS6 went 12.5@112 with full bolt ons, street tires, 3.23's and a predator tune. My M6 WS6 went 12.7@109 with a Lid, Catback and a cutout. I have ran alot of Stock 5.0's in my SRT8 and have never been pulled on and a full bolt on, Tuned M6 LS1 is faster then me by a little. I know because I have ran these races in the same night. A properly driven full bolt on M6 LS1 should be able to pull a Stock 5.0 by about a car. Not saying it should happen every time.
My old M6 Lid, Catback, Cutout WS6 vs Stock 3.31 5.0
I know most of you remember this video it has almost 200,000 views lol
My old M6 Lid, Catback, Cutout WS6 vs Stock 3.31 5.0
I know most of you remember this video it has almost 200,000 views lol
06-27-2012, 07:32 PM
#49
[QUOTE=NiteRiderWS6;16462305]Why alot of you guys think a Stock 5.0 should beat a Full bolt on LS1 is beyond me. Most Stock 5.0's are 109-112 cars and thats a dead heat for a full bolt on LS1. My A4 WS6 went 12.5@112 with full bolt ons, street tires, 3.23's and a predator tune. My M6 WS6 went 12.7@109 with a Lid, Catback and a cutout. I have ran alot of Stock 5.0's in my SRT8 and have never been pulled on and a full bolt on, Tuned M6 LS1 is faster then me by a little. I know because I have ran these races in the same night. A properly driven full bolt on M6 LS1 should be able to pull a Stock 5.0 by about a car. Not saying it should happen every time.
My old M6 Lid, Catback, Cutout WS6 vs Stock 3.31 5.0
I know most of you remember this video it has almost 200,000 views lol
wtf with your sig?
My old M6 Lid, Catback, Cutout WS6 vs Stock 3.31 5.0
I know most of you remember this video it has almost 200,000 views lol
wtf with your sig?
06-27-2012, 08:01 PM
#50
11 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hilliard fl.
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The white stock 5.0 was heating the tires??? why would he heat up stock street tires? it doesnt help, clean them off sure but to heat them up makes no sence.
12.7to 12.5 on a tune??? waste of Cash.. imo
Don't get me wrong, also IMO this is the BEST mustang produced so far, even slightly better then the Termi's I have only rode in one not driven it, but i would admit i would buy one over the new SS unless GM trims the PIG
12.7to 12.5 on a tune??? waste of Cash.. imo
Don't get me wrong, also IMO this is the BEST mustang produced so far, even slightly better then the Termi's I have only rode in one not driven it, but i would admit i would buy one over the new SS unless GM trims the PIG
Last edited by sabersaw30; 06-27-2012 at 08:46 PM.
06-27-2012, 09:10 PM
#52
Staging Lane
Why alot of you guys think a Stock 5.0 should beat a Full bolt on LS1 is beyond me. Most Stock 5.0's are 109-112 cars and thats a dead heat for a full bolt on LS1. My A4 WS6 went 12.5@112 with full bolt ons, street tires, 3.23's and a predator tune. My M6 WS6 went 12.7@109 with a Lid, Catback and a cutout. I have ran alot of Stock 5.0's in my SRT8 and have never been pulled on and a full bolt on, Tuned M6 LS1 is faster then me by a little. I know because I have ran these races in the same night. A properly driven full bolt on M6 LS1 should be able to pull a Stock 5.0 by about a car. Not saying it should happen every time.
My old M6 Lid, Catback, Cutout WS6 vs Stock 3.31 5.0
I know most of you remember this video it has almost 200,000 views lol
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odJQAq7l-hI
My old M6 Lid, Catback, Cutout WS6 vs Stock 3.31 5.0
I know most of you remember this video it has almost 200,000 views lol
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odJQAq7l-hI
Was wondering if you would chime in. As most of you know, I was the guy who set these runs up and was there in person. 5.0 driver bracket races his dads 9 second 4spd chevelle? and is by all accounts a great driver. Did a crap load of runs to get that video, it was not a fluke. Also, that same rental 5.0 had already beaten down two rental 2010 SS auto camaro's a few days earlier. The dig rapeage was due to Niterider's insistence on putting bling bling rims on all his cars, hence no traction.
06-27-2012, 09:49 PM
#53
I disagree with it was a waste of money.Look at his mph went from 111 to 116 mph 5mph is alot.Also listen how bad he was spinning that is a 11 second car all day on some good tires.Spinning that bad with that kind of mph.I bet that car would be close to 119mph coming out hard on some good tires.
06-27-2012, 09:49 PM
#54
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Was wondering if you would chime in. As most of you know, I was the guy who set these runs up and was there in person. 5.0 driver bracket races his dads 9 second 4spd chevelle? and is by all accounts a great driver. Did a crap load of runs to get that video, it was not a fluke. Also, that same rental 5.0 had already beaten down two rental 2010 SS auto camaro's a few days earlier. The dig rapeage was due to Niterider's insistence on putting bling bling rims on all his cars, hence no traction.
06-27-2012, 10:04 PM
#55
but seriously are you that stupid i have to actually sit down here and explain a reply to you? wow.
06-27-2012, 10:14 PM
#56
not going to argue too much with this, one thing ive noticed racing my 2013 is these new mustangs do not like to roll race. especially since the one in the video is an auto. they are great dig cars though but unless its tuned its going to be rather unimpressive in stock form. again not trying to stir **** up worse than its getting but the race in both videos prob would have gone differently ( not drastically) if the 5.0 was tuned and very least got rid of those dam restrictive tail and midpipe mufflers.
06-27-2012, 10:52 PM
#57
Staging Lane
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
that was kinda my point bud, since you quoted i kinda figured the obvious that you directed it to me in some lame attempt to "burn" me. besides whats your deal anyway? have i said anything to you besides my words in this post to offend you? no, unless you are sensitive. have we met before? no. so whats your problem? sounds to me like you got a problem with ford stepping up their game for once and ur mad. mad that your pos camaro isnt the fastest thing in the apartment complex anymore. only explanation i can come up with. well anyway have fun with your hate and discontent. and since you apparently need help understanding a simple reply, if you need any help with reading any of the 3 syllable words in this post just shoot me a pm.
but seriously are you that stupid i have to actually sit down here and explain a reply to you? wow.
but seriously are you that stupid i have to actually sit down here and explain a reply to you? wow.
06-28-2012, 01:00 AM
#60
Teching In
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Brush prairie,wa
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My buddy bought a 02 z28 bone stock and all we did to it was throw my lid on off my camaro and cut out the rear muffler and i got the car to run 12.70 at 111 with no tune or headers on some cheap *** 245 street tires from discount tire. The new 5.0's are honestly over rated. I have never seen one at the local race track get any lower than a 12.9 bone stock and they are trapping 108 to 110.