2valve, Mach, TA, Bird and 5gen
#61
#64
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Pittsburg, Kansas
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How? No excuses. The ls1 has been around forever.2.73's and a stock auto car isn't a real outstanding car. But put a stall and good gears and with 100hp less it'll do plenty fine vs a 5.0. I like the 5.0 its an impressive engine. But i have no reason or motivation to become a nuthugger for one. Im a tight ***, bang-for-the-buck kind of guy and ford cannot touch my needs/wants like an ls motor can.
#65
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes
on
15 Posts
How? No excuses. The ls1 has been around forever.2.73's and a stock auto car isn't a real outstanding car. But put a stall and good gears and with 100hp less it'll do plenty fine vs a 5.0. I like the 5.0 its an impressive engine. But i have no reason or motivation to become a nuthugger for one. Im a tight ***, bang-for-the-buck kind of guy and ford cannot touch my needs/wants like an ls motor can.
#66
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: DSM
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How? No excuses. The ls1 has been around forever.2.73's and a stock auto car isn't a real outstanding car. But put a stall and good gears and with 100hp less it'll do plenty fine vs a 5.0. I like the 5.0 its an impressive engine. But i have no reason or motivation to become a nuthugger for one. Im a tight ***, bang-for-the-buck kind of guy and ford cannot touch my needs/wants like an ls motor can.
#73
It's not down 100 hp to the 5.0. Everybody knows the f bodies had the same engine as the Vette did.
#78
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: DSM
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I guarantee they were M6s